One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Documents Documents Everywhere there are Documents
Page <prev 2 of 2
Feb 2, 2023 12:03:17   #
Justice101
 
microphor wrote:
"The person who orinally classified it". no where does it say a Senator can remove classified docs from the SCIF or declassify them. Bidens been stealing from others as far back as we can trace him, stealing other people's quotes, plagerizing,


EO#13256 Classification does not give Senators the power to classify. It doesn't identify any elected government officials in the following.


Sec. 1.3.

Classification Authority. (a) The authority to classify information originally may be exercised only by:

(1) the President and the Vice President;

(2) agency heads and officials designated by the President; and

(3) United States Government officials delegated this authority pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section.

(b) Officials authorized to classify information at a specified level are also authorized to classify information at a lower level.

(c) Delegation of original classification authority.

(1) Delegations of original classification authority shall be limited to the minimum required to administer this order. Agency heads are responsible for ensuring that designated subordinate officials have a demonstrable and continuing need to exercise this authority.

(2) “Top Secret” original classification authority may be delegated only by the President, the Vice President, or an agency head or official designated pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of this section.

(3) “Secret” or “Confidential” original classification authority may be delegated only by the President, the Vice President, an agency head or official designated pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of this section, or the senior agency official designated under section 5.4(d) of this order, provided that official has been delegated “Top Secret” original classification authority by the agency head.

(4) Each delegation of original classification authority shall be in writing and the authority shall not be redelegated except as provided in this order. Each delegation shall identify the official by name or position.

(5) Delegations of original classification authority shall be reported or made available by name or position to the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office.

(d) All original classification authorities must receive training in proper classification (including the avoidance of over-classification) and declassification as provided in this order and its implementing directives at least once a calendar year. Such training must include instruction on the proper safeguarding of classified information and on the sanctions in section 5.5 of this order that may be brought against an individual who fails to classify information properly or protect classified information from unauthorized disclosure. Original classification authorities who do not receive such mandatory training at least once within a calendar year shall have their classification authority suspended by the agency head or the senior agency official designated under section 5.4(d) of this order until such training has taken place. A waiver may be granted by the agency head, the deputy agency head, or the senior agency official if an individual is unable to receive such training due to unavoidable circumstances. Whenever a waiver is granted, the individual shall receive such training as soon as practicable.

(e) Exceptional cases. When an employee, government contractor, licensee, certificate holder, or grantee of an agency who does not have original classification authority originates information believed by that person to require classification, the information shall be protected in a manner consistent with this order and its implementing directives. The information shall be t***smitted promptly as provided under this order or its implementing directives to the agency that has appropriate subject matter interest and classification authority with respect to this information. That agency shall decide within 30 days whether to classify this information.

Reply
Feb 2, 2023 12:40:29   #
elledee
 
American Vet wrote:
BS

I guess that's why President Trump invited the FBI to his home 2 months before the raid - so he could "hide" documents.


After Trump and his staff conducted the move “on a condensed timeframe,” employees at the National Archives inquired with concerns that the former president may have inadvertently t***sferred classified documents with him. In January, Trump then contacted the Archives, asking movers from the agency to pick up 15 boxes of documents.

The former president later determined a search of his estate may be necessary to find additional documents and chose to invite DOJ Security Division Chief Jay Bratt into his home to retrieve the documents. Accompanying Bratt were three FBI agents.

“Wh**ever you need, just let us know,” former President Trump told the agents prior to the search, the motion said.
Do you think Trump will run for president in 2024?
Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

After Trump handed over some documents Bratt had requested, the DOJ official asked for and was given permission to search a storage room.

It was then that one of the FBI agents made an odd statement.

“Thank you. You did not need to show us the storage room, but we appreciate it. Now it all makes sense,” the agent said.

Bratt later asked Trump to secure the storage room, prompting Trump to direct his staff to do so.

Two months later, on Aug. 8, FBI agents arrived at Mar-a-Lago to conduct their unannounced raid.


https://www.westernjournal.com/fbi-visited-mar-lago-2-months-raid-said-now-makes-sense-looking-around-storeroom-lawsuit/
BS br br I guess that's why President Trump invit... (show quote)


Thank you for providing the facts AKA a liberals worst nightmare

Reply
Feb 2, 2023 13:27:34   #
Fred day
 
What both sides of this inane argument are missing is that there are hundreds of documents classified that need not have been classified in the first place. That's bureaucracy at its worst.

Reply
 
 
Feb 2, 2023 13:41:01   #
American Vet
 
Fred day wrote:
What both sides of this inane argument are missing is that there are hundreds of documents classified that need not have been classified in the first place. That's bureaucracy at its worst.


Agree with that except I believe you are wrong in saying 'hundreds'; I would wager it is more like 'thousand'.

No need for something to be 'classified' unless it has a direct bearing on national security. And that needs to be carefully scrutinized.

Reply
Feb 2, 2023 17:16:49   #
elledee
 
microphor wrote:
"The person who orinally classified it". no where does it say a Senator can remove classified docs from the SCIF or declassify them. Bidens been stealing from others as far back as we can trace him, stealing other people's quotes, plagerizing,


He has survived almost fifty years of politics by lying and stealing

Reply
Feb 2, 2023 19:53:19   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
elledee wrote:
He has survived almost fifty years of politics by lying and stealing


T***h

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.