older and wiser

Is your house under water? If not maybe you should think again about spouting crap you know nothing about like Al Gore!

American Vet

Of course c*****e c****e might be a real problem. The issue is ‘man made’ c*****e c****e and the presumption that Americans can significantly impact it.

But predictions have been going on for 100 years that ‘we are going to die/freeze/starve’. And they have all been wrong.
1895 - Geologists Think theWorld May Be Frozen Up Again – New York Times, February 1895
1902 - “Disappearing Glaciers…deteriorating slowly, with a persistency that means their final annihilation…scientific fact…surely disappearing.” – Los Angeles Times
1912 - Prof. Schmidt Warns Us of an Encroaching Ice Age – New York Times, October 1912
1923 - “Scientist says Arctic ice will wipe out Canada” – Professor Gregory of Yale University, American representative to the Pan-Pacific Science Congress, – Chicago Tribune
1923 - “The discoveries of changes in the sun’s heat and the southward advance of glaciers in recent years have given rise to conjectures of the possible advent of a new ice age” – Washington Post
1924 - MacMillan Reports Signs of New Ice Age – New York Times, Sept 18, 1924
1929 - “Most geologists think the world is growing warmer, and that it will continue to get warmer” – Los Angeles Times, in Is another ice age coming?
1932 - “If these things be true, it is evident, therefore that we must be just teetering on an ice age” – The Atlantic magazine, This Cold, Cold World
1933 - America in Longest Warm Spell Since 1776; Temperature Line Records a 25-Year Rise – New York Times, March 27th, 1933
1933 – “…wide-spread and persistent tendency toward warmer weather…Is our climate changing?” – Federal Weather Bureau “Monthly Weather Review.”
1938 - G****l w*****g, caused by man heating the planet with carbon dioxide, “is likely to prove beneficial to mankind in several ways, besides the provision of heat and power.”– Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
1938 - “Experts puzzle over 20 year mercury rise…Chicago is in the front rank of thousands of cities thuout the world which have been affected by a mysterious trend toward warmer climate in the last two decades” – Chicago Tribune
1939 - “Gaffers who claim that winters were harder when they were boys are quite right… weather men have no doubt that the world at least for the time being is growing warmer” – Washington Post
1952 - “…we have learned that the world has been getting warmer in the last half century” – New York Times, August 10th, 1962
1954 - “…winters are getting milder, summers drier. Glaciers are receding, deserts growing” – U.S. News and World Report
1954 - Climate – the Heat May Be Off – Fortune Magazine
1959 - “Arctic Findings in Particular Support Theory of Rising Global Temperatures” – New York Times
1969 - “…the Arctic pack ice is thinning and that the ocean at the North Pole may become an open sea within a decade or two” – New York Times, February 20th, 1969
1969 – “If I were a gambler, I would take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000″ — Paul Ehrlich (while he now predicts doom from g****l w*****g, this quote only gets honorable mention, as he was talking about his crazy fear of overpopulation)
1970 - “…get a good grip on your long johns, cold weather h**ers – the worst may be yet to come…there’s no relief in sight” – Washington Post
1974 - G****l c*****g for the past forty years – Time Magazine
1974 - “Climatological Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age” –Washington Post
1974 - “As for the present cooling trend a number of leading climatologists have concluded that it is very bad news indeed” – Fortune magazine, who won a Science Writing Award from the American Institute of Physics for its analysis of the danger
1974 - “…the facts of the present c*****e c****e are such that the most optimistic experts would assign near certainty to major crop failure…mass deaths by starvation, and probably anarchy and violence” – New York Times

https://710wor.iheart.com/featured/mark-simone/content/2019-10-08-the-list-of-120-years-of-climate-scares-by-scientists/

Bevvy

Biden is proselytizing his religion trying to get as many as he can believing in his cult

WEBCO

Educated and intelligent people know that anthropomorphic c*****e c****e is a h**x, nothing more than a power grab.

We look at the science and follow it. Why do climate alarmists believe in anthropomorphic c*****e c****e when it's been disproven many times over the years.

saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina

Proud, The reason why Democrats always point to Trump is because he still owns the GOP with around 70% of the Republicans. Those Republicans really believe that Trump had the e******n s****n from him, and he has announced that he is running again. De Santos is really more dangerous than Trump. He is advocating social policies that Trump would never even dream of.
Right now, The economy is doing nothing but growing. The number of jobs created is noting less than amazing. Inflation is still going up, but much more slowly. The Fed will probably have to raise interest rates again to further control it. The stock market is recovering nicely.
The Republic Party is doing nothing but revenge attacks against Democrats that had the audacity to fight Trump. They have no policies that I can see, except trying to do away with every one of the New Deal projects like social security.

American Vet

You don't see it because you choose to ignore things that don't fit your narrative. Intellectual dishonesty on your part; but not unexpected since you have been proven to be a liar.

Here’s What Republicans Plan To Do As They Retake The House

Key Facts

The rules package establishes multiple select subcommittees, including an updated committee on the c****av***s p******c, which will now investigate the origins of C****-** and government spending during the p******c.

There could also be a committee on “the Weaponization of the Federal Government” to investigate purported abuses by the Biden Administration’s Justice Department and FBI.

There are proposed changes to the Office of Congressional Ethics that would remove Democrats from the office’s board and make it harder to staff, which governmental ethics experts condemned Monday and suggested could make it harder for incoming Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) to face repercussions for lying about much of his background.

The House would be allowed to take up a series of controversial bills outside of its normal processes, which could make them easier to pass, including legislation prohibiting taxpayer funds from being used on a******ns, authorizing Homeland Security to suspend the entry of migrants into the country, increasing oil and gas production and adding additional healthcare restrictions regarding fetuses who survive attempted a******ns.

The GOP plans to eliminate a resolution that established labor unions for House staffers, after workers unionized last term amid a broader controversy over low pay and poor working conditions for Capitol Hill employees.

The proposed rules reestablish a “cut-as-you-go” policy that requires any increases in mandatory government spending to be offset by decreases in spending elsewhere, which outgoing House Rules Committee chair Rep. James McGovern (D-Mass.) criticized as an effort to “more easily cut taxes on billionaire corporations while slashing the social safety net.”

The House J****** 6 C*******e, which dissolved at the end of 2022, will be required to turn over all of its underlying documents to the Committee on House Administration, rather than the National Archives, which the Los Angeles Times suggests could mean Republicans will launch their own counter-investigation to “rebut” the committee’s high-profile probe.

Other proposed measures include requiring the House to consider resolutions that oppose defunding law enforcement and attacks on anti-a******n rights facilities and organizations; making it easier for lawmakers to oust the Speaker of the House and reimposing the “Holman Rule,” which allows lawmakers to cut federal employees’ salaries or terminate them and get rid of government programs.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2023/01/02/heres-what-republicans-plan-to-do-as-they-retake-the-house---including-investigating-the-doj-and-gutting-the-ethics-office/?sh=40a8304f4a5a

nonalien1 Loc: Mojave Desert

Man has affected c*****e c****e. But not from automobiles so much as from destroying the rainforests. So much of the rainforests are being torn down every day that the decomposing debris is making more CO2 then Oxygen for the first time in known history. If governments were serious about c*****e c****e they would stop this distruction as this is a big supplier of Oxygen for our planet and is something that is doable. As is cleaning up our oceans. Another big supplier of Oxygen. But not good for revenue so it likely won't happen.
Also if they were serious about global c*****e c****e they would ban all nuclear weapons.

older and wiser

That’s why democrats push c*****e c****e h**x, they are as dumb as they sound when the spout off things they have zero intelligence of knowing anything about! That’s being a democrat, pretending to be an expert while actually an i***t!

SeaLass Loc: Western Soviet Socialist Republics

I would take Joe's comments to mean that he thinks a nuclear war would not alter the climate much. Mmmmm, what was that discussion awhile back, something about a nuclear winter or some such?

SeaLass Loc: Western Soviet Socialist Republics

Under Obama, Russia invaded Ukraine and North Korea conducted nuclear and ballistic missile tests on an almost weekly basis and China built a military air facility on an artificially created island.

Under Trump, nearly all of these activities stopped.

Under Biden, Russia again invaded Ukraine, North Korea restarted missile tests and talks about restarting nuclear testing and China sends military aircraft into Taiwanese air space and "weather balloons" over countries in the western hemisphere.

But of course Trump was the major threat to world peace.

pegw

See this, because of the concept of mutually assured destruction, it is unlikely we will have a nuclear war. C*****e c****e is real, and happening now. Therefore c*****e c****e is a real problem and needs to be adressed.

wilpharm

he is controlled by Soros & obama

older and wiser

Only an i***t thinks he, she or it is God!

American Vet

C*****e c****e has been happening since the beginning of the planet.

The real problem is the ‘man made c*****e c****e’ h**x.

older and wiser

And it’s a fools h**x!