Ukrainian Officials Blew $100 Billion in US Uniparty Dollars on Sports Cars, Mansions, Luxury Vacations, etc.
Ri-chard wrote:
The enforcement is to come from We the People not the English Rule of Law form followed by DOJ or the Supreme Court. Remember, the English told the Americans they had won the war. However, the English created their own 1783 Definitive Treaty of Peace aka Treaty of Paris that clearly shows who won..
Yep, the Americans never created a Doctrine of Conquest or an American Treaty claiming all the spoils of war they fought for. So here we are today stating all the things that are wrong with our government not knowing the cause. Therefore, not knowing the corrective actions needed to capture what is owed to us.
The enforcement is to come from We the People not ... (
show quote)
Having read the Articles of the Treaty of Paris I find Britain recognizing a sovereign USA. Article 8 is odd stating British subjects may forever freely navigate the Mississippi River.
Article 9 is a bit convoluted.
The treaty says keep your Negroes, your cannon, all records, legal archives, etc.
JR-57 wrote:
The Capital Building and the White House would be echo chambers if everyone who violated their oath of office left voluntarily.
Please consider, they all have plausible deniability for breaching their oath. Why, because they were only following their instructions to swear an oath to "the constitution of the United States". It was written in 1789 as a law they made just before General Washington was sworn into office as POTUS on a Masonic bible and given the verbal instructions by another Mason for what words to repeat they are to swear to... Remember, the Masons, English Esquires and illuminati folks had already taken their blood oaths and or given their allegiances to King George 3rd. you can only serve one master. See there is no such document to be found anywhere in law or at law with that title they all swear to.
They swear to what is OF them of the United States. Not stating what is for them in representing the will of the people ordained FOR the United States OF AMERICA. caps my emphasis.
Words mean everything especially when changing them and deleting others from the original contract. So says basic contract law.
WE THE PEOPLE Of The United States, In Order To Form A More Perfect Union, Establish Justice, Insure Domestic Tranquility, Provide For The Common Defense, Promote The General Welfare, And Secure The Blessings Of Liberty To Ourselves And Our Posterity, Do Ordain And Establish This Constitution For The United States Of America.
WE THE PEOPLE established and ordained the Constitution. WE are the ones who created the federal government with its three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. WE are the ones who gave the federal government permission to exist and told it exactly what it had permission to do, when WE assigned enumerated powers to each branch.
WE are the “creator” – the federal government is merely our “creature”. (Federalist No. 33 (6th para), A. Hamilton.)
There is no word magic, just simple English words.
Ri-chard wrote:
Please consider, they all have plausible deniability for breaching their oath. Why, because they were only following their instructions to swear an oath to "the constitution of the United States". It was written in 1789 as a law they made just before General Washington was sworn into office as POTUS on a Masonic bible and given the verbal instructions by another Mason for what words to repeat they are to swear to... Remember, the Masons, English Esquires and illuminati folks had already taken their blood oaths and or given their allegiances to King George 3rd. you can only serve one master. See there is no such document to be found anywhere in law or at law with that title they all swear to.
They swear to what is OF them of the United States. Not stating what is for them in representing the will of the people ordained FOR the United States OF AMERICA. caps my emphasis.
Words mean everything especially when changing them and deleting others from the original contract. So says basic contract law.
Please consider, they all have plausible deniabili... (
show quote)
Our original Constitution does read Constitution’for’ not of.
It is probably bogus but I have heard of the 1871 post Civil War “ corporate constitution.”
Wordsmiths can mess anything up. That’s why law is esoteric.
JuristBooks wrote:
Our original Constitution does read Constitution’for’ not of.
It is probably bogus but I have heard of the 1871 post Civil War “ corporate constitution.”
Wordsmiths can mess anything up. That’s why law is esoteric.
And also, to note, when King George 3rd stated in his Treaty claiming all the States are to be Free and Sovereign. (no mention of the status of the American people was mentioned)
What were his States?
What you think is a State is in reality a Corporation, in other words, a Person. State Governor
See "Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is Person." 9 F. Supp 272
"Word "person" does not include state. 12 Op Atty Gen 176.
https://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=1516The United States Corporation Manual - 1921.pdf - Google Drive
It seems there are no States, just CORPORATIONS. A Corporation is an artificial entity, a fiction at law. They only exist in your mind. They are images in your mind, that speak to you - BOO! We labor, pledge our property, and give our children to a fiction. Request a D&B report on your State government agencies for proof. You will receive a financial report on a corporation for profit. This includes judicial.
Ri-chard wrote:
And also, to note, when King George 3rd stated in his Treaty claiming all the States are to be Free and Sovereign. (no mention of the status of the American people was mentioned)
What were his States?
What you think is a State is in reality a Corporation, in other words, a Person. State Governor
See "Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is Person." 9 F. Supp 272
"Word "person" does not include state. 12 Op Atty Gen 176.
https://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=1516The United States Corporation Manual - 1921.pdf - Google Drive
It seems there are no States, just CORPORATIONS. A Corporation is an artificial entity, a fiction at law. They only exist in your mind. They are images in your mind, that speak to you - BOO! We labor, pledge our property, and give our children to a fiction. Request a D&B report on your State government agencies for proof. You will receive a financial report on a corporation for profit. This includes judicial.
And also, to note, when King George 3rd stated in ... (
show quote)
~~~~
Ri-chard,
You are exactly right on target .
I have been trying for years to open eyes here on OPP and have done so repeatedly to those interested in learning what's happened asking them to study:
www.usavsus.infoIt is truly an eye opener outlining how the original constitution and governance intended differs from the present CORPORATION that exists and explains the Organic Act of 1871 and how a corporation was created.
.yes, the change of 'of America' and
'for America' makes a difference.
Small changes plus capitalization of words change the meaning.
JuristBooks wrote:
Having read the Articles of the Treaty of Paris I find Britain recognizing a sovereign USA. Article 8 is odd stating British subjects may forever freely navigate the Mississippi River.
Article 9 is a bit convoluted.
The treaty says keep your Negroes, your cannon, all records, legal archives, etc.
Both Washington and Franklin were Mason's and we know 'Masonry' was in England as well! -- BIG TIME...
okie don wrote:
~~~~
Ri-chard,
You are exactly right on target .
I have been trying for years to open eyes here on OPP and have done so repeatedly to those interested in learning what's happened asking them to study:
www.usavsus.infoIt is truly an eye opener outlining how the original constitution and governance intended differs from the present CORPORATION that exists and explains the Organic Act of 1871 and how a corporation was created.
.yes, the change of 'of America' and
'for America' makes a difference.
Small changes plus capitalization of words change the meaning.
~~~~ br Ri-chard, br You are exactly right on targ... (
show quote)
Again, the oath = of the US vs for the USA as your posted link suggest. It all fraud and it started in the beginning. And don't forget in 1781 General Cornwallis told us what the foundations for deep State would be to snooker We the People by a false Jew religion.
Save as early American history references.
https://christianobserver.net/judaized-christianity-front-for-new-world-order-sen-mccarth/http://newensign.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Legions-of-Satan-Banning.pdf
okie don wrote:
~~~~
Ri-chard,
You are exactly right on target .
I have been trying for years to open eyes here on OPP and have done so repeatedly to those interested in learning what's happened asking them to study:
www.usavsus.infoIt is truly an eye opener outlining how the original constitution and governance intended differs from the present CORPORATION that exists and explains the Organic Act of 1871 and how a corporation was created.
.yes, the change of 'of America' and
'for America' makes a difference.
Small changes plus capitalization of words change the meaning.
~~~~ br Ri-chard, br You are exactly right on targ... (
show quote)
This is a good reference for knowing our phony government.
https://stopthecrime.net/Articles%20of%20Incorporation%20-%20timeline%20text.pdf
okie don wrote:
Both Washington and Franklin were Mason's and we know 'Masonry' was in England as well! -- BIG TIME...
And all that signed the 1783 Treaty were the King's English esquires. In 1826, William B****stone reiterated that, "the title Esquire should be limited to those only who bear an office of trust under the Crown and who are styled esquires by the king in their commissions and appointments; and all, I conceive, who are once honored by the king with the title of Esquire have a right to that distinction for life."
Important to know and understand, no American patriots had a voice in the King's Treaty. Therefore, they immediately lost the right to v**e on how the Federal and State government was to be for formed. They lost the right to own their lands with free and clear title - only the English were protected - Read the Treaty. The Americans lost the right to choose their Rule of Law form - God's law/Natural laws - they got Admiralty, Law of the Sea and the BAR's common law form. Later they lost the right to choose their form of Banking, commerce and currency forms - they got the King's banking system with all foreign stockholders. See the Treaty for the King's claim that he was the Arch-treasurer of the United States of America. Yes, it got worse as the people slept. Lincoln declared us as enemy of the State and Roosevelt declared us as enemies of the banks and stole our gold. Then we got more NGOs as the Federal Reserve and IRS to steal more money from us.
JR-57 wrote:
Too bad we don’t have them sign an actual binding legal contract in addition to the oath of office they all violate.
You are right. The oath they take is useless and most are outright breaking it with no consequences. They should definitely have to sign a "Contract with Americans" and be kicked out of office when violating their contract. A huge fine would also be in effect when that contract is broken with no pension either.
Big Kahuna wrote:
You are right. The oath they take is useless and most are outright breaking it with no consequences. They should definitely have to sign a "Contract with Americans" and be kicked out of office when violating their contract. A huge fine would also be in effect when that contract is broken with no pension either.
Death sentence sends a clear message.
JR-57
Loc: South Carolina
JuristBooks wrote:
Death sentence sends a clear message.
Eliminates any misunderstanding. The best part is no repeat offenders.
JuristBooks wrote:
Death sentence sends a clear message.
A death sentence could be pretty harsh but having a few body parts removed may send a type of "eunuchal" message, oops, I mean unique message.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.