Shall not be infringed? (Page 8): That’s a great answer and a true answer you have no idea what you’re talking about...

BIRDMAN

Jacquie wrote:

Terrible answer. Birdman, deeply rooted and springing from the days of s***ery. It smacks of bigotry.

That’s a great answer and a true answer you have no idea what you’re talking about

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Farnorth wrote:

I used a stoner 63 in the late 60s. I have never seen a more lethal handheld. The ar 15 was from 58 or 59 and was an battle assault rifle built to that spec.
No one uses them for home defense, except in the movies. They aren’t even good for hunting, too much damage . Same with the 50 cal elk rifles.

Not remotely true. The AR-15 ammo is much the same as the round for a .22 rifle.

BIRDMAN

JFlorio wrote:

Not remotely true. The AR-15 ammo is much the same as the round for a .22 rifle.

It’s close to the same diameter as a 22 but it travels a lot faster I think about 3000 ft./s

archie bunker Loc: Texas

JFlorio wrote:

Not remotely true. The AR-15 ammo is much the same as the round for a .22 rifle.

It moves faster than a .22lr, but, same diameter bullet. I guess this guy never heard of the .22-.250. It's a screamer.

okie don

Jacquie wrote:

9 br JR, my brain is fried as I spent the entire a... (show quote)

Jacquie,
wwwusavsus.info

Lots of info here that will make one scratch their heads!

Jacquie Loc: New York

okie don wrote:

Jacquie,
wwwusavsus.info

Lots of info here that will make one scratch their heads!

Thank you, okie don. That was the article I was referencing.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Birdmam wrote:

It’s close to the same diameter as a 22 but it travels a lot faster I think about 3000 ft./s

Yea it’s much faster. Why I’d rather hunt with an AR THAN A .22.

Big Bass

Kevyn wrote:

Do you think the second amendment gives Americans the right to keep and bear arms such as grenade launchers and shoulder fired anti aircraft missiles?

I suggest you call dfn obumbum, n**i peeloosely, upchuck schleumy, the i***t biden, et al., and tell them not to organize and pay those murderous thugs to k**l anyone else. Haven’t you noticed these gun-toting i***ts do this every time the c****es in power, aka democrats, need a deflection from issues very troubling to your i***t party, in this case, the Monterey Park slaughter, biden’s monumental f***-up over his stash of documents unlawfully in his possession?? They all believe this will sway the American public against the Right, thereby winning themselves v**es, enabling you lefty i***ts to be able to remove the 2nd Amendment.

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

JFlorio wrote:

They are not assault rifles. any gun can be a home defense weapon. I have AR-15's and an AK-47. My 12 gauge shotgun is my preferred weapon for home defense. Attack other citizens? Stupid comment.

Naah !

Rowdy Yates

Bach wrote:

Probably not. There was no forethought about such weapons in 1787

Why do you think they called it arms instead of guns.

Rowdy Yates

Kevyn wrote:

Do you think the second amendment gives Americans the right to keep and bear arms such as grenade launchers and shoulder fired anti aircraft missiles?

Of course it does! If I can build it in my garage I should be allowed to own it. How else does the entreprenure develop the next new improved EMP weapon? When I can set off the explosives in ejection seats and the incoming missiles remotely I'll be able to defend myself. Why piddle around with grenades and missiles if they can't even touch me or anyone that buys an EMP weapon from me.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Farnorth wrote:

I used a stoner 63 in the late 60s. I have never seen a more lethal handheld. The ar 15 was from 58 or 59 and was an battle assault rifle built to that spec.
No one uses them for home defense, except in the movies. They aren’t even good for hunting, too much damage . Same with the 50 cal elk rifles.

You trying to tell us the 223 rem/5.56mm is the most lethal cartridge in existence? You're full of s**t.

Why is it when this particular cartridge is loaded into an AR 15, it suddenly gains enormous k*****g power?
You'd think it was a designated WMD.

There is a wide variety of firearms, pistols and rifles, bolt action, single shot, and semi-auto (including the AR 15) chambered for the 223rem/5.56mm. They are used for hunting - predators, feral hogs, varmints, and even game animals, and for target shooting and competition.

AR15s were never issued to troops. Ask a soldier or marine if he would take an AR15 into combat and he'd tell you to shove it up your ass.

An assault rifle is a select fire weapon capable of full automatic fire like a machine gun. AR15s are solely semi-auto.

Farnorth wrote:

You can pretend you know the definition of assault rifles, but I am quoting the manufacturer.

Name the manufacturer who designated the AR15 as an assault rifle.
You can't. Fact is the democrats under Clinton politically defined what is an assault rifle. The AR15 is on their s**t list.

JR-57 Loc: South Carolina

Blade_Runner wrote:

Name the manufacturer who designated the AR15 as an assault rifle.
You can't. Fact is the democrats under Clinton politically defined what is an assault rifle. The AR15 is on their s**t list.

Lefties love to h**e what they have no knowledge of and don’t understand. The Constitution and ARs are prime examples.

DASHY

Rowdy Yates wrote:

Of course it does! If I can build it in my garage I should be allowed to own it. How else does the entreprenure develop the next new improved EMP weapon? When I can set off the explosives in ejection seats and the incoming missiles remotely I'll be able to defend myself. Why piddle around with grenades and missiles if they can't even touch me or anyone that buys an EMP weapon from me.

Do you live in a war zone? Who in your neighborhood has the ability to fire "incoming missiles" at your home?

American Vet

DASHY wrote:

Do you live in a war zone? Who in your neighborhood has the ability to fire "incoming missiles" at your home?

As with most ELWNJs, you aren't quite smart enough to recognize satire.