Shockingly, the T***s Cult Keeps Finding Ways to Get Weirder (Page 4): Yes I do...... And I saw you up front holding that f**g.

Gothredneck Loc: Cousin loving Bama

permafrost wrote:

why?? Do you pay attention to gay parades?

Yes I do...... And I saw you up front holding that f**g.

Big Kahuna

Gothredneck wrote:

Yes I do...... And I saw you up front holding that f**g.

Perm likes holding f**gs. Unfortunately none of those f**gs are the American f**g. Perm is nothing but a false f**g.

EmilyD

permafrost wrote:

why?? Do you pay attention to gay parades?

How could anyone NOT pay attention to gay parades when they see this going on at them....

....

BIRDMAN

pegw wrote:

I would like to know how do you feel about George Santos career as the d**g q***n Kitera in Brazil? Reuters, a very reiable news source reported it. There are pictures. Do you think George, alias Anthony DeVolder was g***ming childern?

I think you h**e d**g q***ns

Ricktloml

Parky60 wrote:

The escalation in t***s (-g****r and -vestite) news in recent years has been truly mind-boggling. A fringe (don’t believe the new numbers) segment of the American public has been dominating the l*****t news organizations. While it’s true that the MSM is just making it up as they go along, I would have guessed they’d go for something more l*****t mainstream, like paying for everything that i*****l a***ns do once they arrive here.

Instead, they have decided that the woke agenda was best forced on American society via the “T” portion of the L***Q alphabet soup community.

The woke t***s agenda is everywhere now. We’re even seeing corporations get in on the messaging.

Here’s the thing, though: the more that the Democrats try to convince us that this is all normal and well, the more outlandish the t***s crowd becomes.

Now there are t***s men who are freezing tomato juice to help them mimic period symptoms. I won’t go into detail about exactly what the boys are doing with the juice, but I would refer to them as “poopsicles”. There are even online forums discussing how best for a b********l m**e who wants to pretend that he’s a woman to f**e a period.

I guess it’s a rite of passage that the t***s guys go through before they can “get pregnant.”

There was also a recent story about men and m*******tion, but with a slightly different angle:

In a stunning victory over the patriarchy, women now have yet another t*********r icon who was born with a penis to represent them and their feminine hygiene needs. A second t*********r (self-identified “girl”/adult human male Dylan Mulvaney being the first) named Jeffrey Marsh just scored an endorsement deal with Tampax.

Nothing says, “This should all be normalized,” like big bucks being paid to males to help actual women with the stigma of menses. We’re apparently living in 1870, except for the whole men pretending they can get knocked up part.

We’ve been told over and over again that we’re supposed to have more sympathy for marginalized people in our society. That’s difficult to do when said people are going out of their way to be deliberately provocative and — dare I say it — triggering. Of course, if we mention that sticking frozen tomato juice in a rectum for a bit of make believe is disturbing or that guys doing tampon commercials is nonsensical and absurd, we’re called “t***sphobic.”

Nah, we’re just realists who know weird when we see it.

And it’s OK that we’re not OK with it.

The escalation in t***s (-g****r and -vestite) new... (show quote)

Of course the "t***s" Cult keeps getting weirder. When you feed evil...it grows

pegw

microphor wrote:

People's opinion isn't "proof". Show me a current " actual" cut in SSI due to " Republican policy".

The last time this came up in a Republican congress, Social Security age of full benefits was uped from 65 to 67.

Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois

pegw wrote:

The last time this came up in a Republican congress, Social Security age of full benefits was uped from 65 to 67.

You do realize that up until the "safe and effective" vax that people were living longer didn't you?

microphor Loc: Home is TN

pegw wrote:

The last time this came up in a Republican congress, Social Security age of full benefits was uped from 65 to 67.

Show me a policy where they cut social security, people are living longer, working longer, paying into system longer, Show me a policy where Republicans cut or "got rid of" social security! Reliable sources, opinions don't count-POLICY only!

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

microphor wrote:

Show me a policy where they cut social security, people are living longer, working longer, paying into system longer, Show me a policy where Republicans cut or "got rid of" social security! Reliable sources, opinions don't count-POLICY only!

Micro, we keep telling you about Reagan, when his trickle down economics did not work, he had to modify SS, tax it and us the SS money to keep his economy going.. Follow the link to read the story of how he robbed the SS for wars and covering of taxation shortfalls after reducing what the rich paid in fed taxes.

https://www.fedsmith.com/2013/10/11/ronald-reagan-and-the-great-social-security-heist/

Reagan is still revered by a lot of Americans. This reverence for Ronald Reagan helps to explain how he was able to fool most of the American people to a degree unparalleled by any other modern president.

With the help of Alan Greenspan, Reagan pulled off one of the greatest frauds ever perpetrated against the American people.

It is so ironic that many people, today, still believe that Ronald Reagan came galloping up on a great white horse to sound the alarm that Social Security was in deep financial trouble. He then allegedly figured out a solution to the problem and rammed his legislative proposal through Congress in a three-month period.

On April 20, 1983, the signing ceremony for the new legislation took place with great fanfare. Below are some of Reagan’s remarks at the signing ceremony.

This bill demonstrates for all time our nation’s ironclad commitment to social security. It assures the elderly that America will always keep the promises made in troubled times a half a century ago. It assures those who are still working that they, too, have a pact with the future. From this day forward, they have our pledge that they will get their fair share of benefits when they retire…

Today, all of us can look each other square in the eye and say, “We kept our promises.” We promised that we would protect the financial integrity of social security. We have. We promised that we would protect beneficiaries against any loss in current benefits. We have. And we promised to attend to the needs of those still working, not only those Americans nearing retirement but young people just entering the labor force. And we’ve done that, too…

A Day of Shame
Instead of being a proud day for America, April 20, 1983, has become a day of shame. The Social Security Amendments of 1983 laid the foundation for 30-years of federal embezzlement of Social Security money in order to use the money to pay for wars, tax cuts and other government programs.

The payroll tax hike of 1983 generated a total of $2.7 trillion in surplus Social Security revenue. This surplus revenue was supposed to be saved and invested in marketable U.S. Treasury bonds that would be held in the trust fund until the baby boomers began to retire in about 2010. But not one dime of that money went to Social Security.

The 1983 legislation was sold to the public, and to the Congress, as a long-term fix for Social Security. The payroll tax hike was designed to generate large Social Security surpluses for 30 years, which would be set aside to cover the increased cost of paying benefits when the boomers retired.

microphor Loc: Home is TN

permafrost wrote:

Micro, we keep telling you about Reagan, when his trickle down economics did not work, he had to modify SS, tax it and us the SS money to keep his economy going.. Follow the link to read the story of how he robbed the SS for wars and covering of taxation shortfalls after reducing what the rich paid in fed taxes.

https://www.fedsmith.com/2013/10/11/ronald-reagan-and-the-great-social-security-heist/

Reagan is still revered by a lot of Americans. This reverence for Ronald Reagan helps to explain how he was able to fool most of the American people to a degree unparalleled by any other modern president.

With the help of Alan Greenspan, Reagan pulled off one of the greatest frauds ever perpetrated against the American people.

It is so ironic that many people, today, still believe that Ronald Reagan came galloping up on a great white horse to sound the alarm that Social Security was in deep financial trouble. He then allegedly figured out a solution to the problem and rammed his legislative proposal through Congress in a three-month period.

On April 20, 1983, the signing ceremony for the new legislation took place with great fanfare. Below are some of Reagan’s remarks at the signing ceremony.

This bill demonstrates for all time our nation’s ironclad commitment to social security. It assures the elderly that America will always keep the promises made in troubled times a half a century ago. It assures those who are still working that they, too, have a pact with the future. From this day forward, they have our pledge that they will get their fair share of benefits when they retire…

Today, all of us can look each other square in the eye and say, “We kept our promises.” We promised that we would protect the financial integrity of social security. We have. We promised that we would protect beneficiaries against any loss in current benefits. We have. And we promised to attend to the needs of those still working, not only those Americans nearing retirement but young people just entering the labor force. And we’ve done that, too…

A Day of Shame
Instead of being a proud day for America, April 20, 1983, has become a day of shame. The Social Security Amendments of 1983 laid the foundation for 30-years of federal embezzlement of Social Security money in order to use the money to pay for wars, tax cuts and other government programs.

The payroll tax hike of 1983 generated a total of $2.7 trillion in surplus Social Security revenue. This surplus revenue was supposed to be saved and invested in marketable U.S. Treasury bonds that would be held in the trust fund until the baby boomers began to retire in about 2010. But not one dime of that money went to Social Security.

The 1983 legislation was sold to the public, and to the Congress, as a long-term fix for Social Security. The payroll tax hike was designed to generate large Social Security surpluses for 30 years, which would be set aside to cover the increased cost of paying benefits when the boomers retired.

Micro, we keep telling you about Reagan, when his ... (show quote)

Like I said, a Republican policy that directly cuts or ends social security

Big Kahuna

pegw wrote:

The last time this came up in a Republican congress, Social Security age of full benefits was uped from 65 to 67.

If it wasn't, you would not be getting any SS at all but the i******s would. It's called bankruptcy.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

microphor wrote:

Like I said, a Republican policy that directly cuts or ends social security

So removing some or taxing what we get or taking the SS money for other purposes does not count?

Justice101

permafrost wrote:

Micro, we keep telling you about Reagan, when his trickle down economics did not work, he had to modify SS, tax it and us the SS money to keep his economy going.. Follow the link to read the story of how he robbed the SS for wars and covering of taxation shortfalls after reducing what the rich paid in fed taxes.

https://www.fedsmith.com/2013/10/11/ronald-reagan-and-the-great-social-security-heist/

Reagan is still revered by a lot of Americans. This reverence for Ronald Reagan helps to explain how he was able to fool most of the American people to a degree unparalleled by any other modern president.

With the help of Alan Greenspan, Reagan pulled off one of the greatest frauds ever perpetrated against the American people.

It is so ironic that many people, today, still believe that Ronald Reagan came galloping up on a great white horse to sound the alarm that Social Security was in deep financial trouble. He then allegedly figured out a solution to the problem and rammed his legislative proposal through Congress in a three-month period.

On April 20, 1983, the signing ceremony for the new legislation took place with great fanfare. Below are some of Reagan’s remarks at the signing ceremony.

This bill demonstrates for all time our nation’s ironclad commitment to social security. It assures the elderly that America will always keep the promises made in troubled times a half a century ago. It assures those who are still working that they, too, have a pact with the future. From this day forward, they have our pledge that they will get their fair share of benefits when they retire…

Today, all of us can look each other square in the eye and say, “We kept our promises.” We promised that we would protect the financial integrity of social security. We have. We promised that we would protect beneficiaries against any loss in current benefits. We have. And we promised to attend to the needs of those still working, not only those Americans nearing retirement but young people just entering the labor force. And we’ve done that, too…

A Day of Shame
Instead of being a proud day for America, April 20, 1983, has become a day of shame. The Social Security Amendments of 1983 laid the foundation for 30-years of federal embezzlement of Social Security money in order to use the money to pay for wars, tax cuts and other government programs.

The payroll tax hike of 1983 generated a total of $2.7 trillion in surplus Social Security revenue. This surplus revenue was supposed to be saved and invested in marketable U.S. Treasury bonds that would be held in the trust fund until the baby boomers began to retire in about 2010. But not one dime of that money went to Social Security.

The 1983 legislation was sold to the public, and to the Congress, as a long-term fix for Social Security. The payroll tax hike was designed to generate large Social Security surpluses for 30 years, which would be set aside to cover the increased cost of paying benefits when the boomers retired.

Micro, we keep telling you about Reagan, when his ... (show quote)

Has Congress really borrowed trillions from Social Security for government spending?

The Seniors Center President Dan Perrin answered “Has the U.S. Congress really borrowed trillions from Social Security to use for government spending?” on Quora:

Yes. In 1983, The Greenspan Commission came up with a plan to save money to provide for the retirement of the Baby Boom Generation. President Reagan and the Democrat-controlled Congress agreed with the plan and raised Social Security withholding which immediately resulted in a large surplus in the Social Security Trust Fund.

Unfortunately, Congress saw that surplus and decided to borrow and spend it. It was all very legal. In fact, the United States Treasury even created special bonds to to show how much money they owed to Social Security.

Over the next thirty years, that surplus grew to almost $3 Trillion. And Congress continued borrowing it.

Now, the Social Security Trust Fund sits empty — there isn’t enough money to pay the benefits that are owed this year. But there is a file cabinet in Parkersburg, West Virginia filled with those special bonds the Treasury issued to replace the money in the Social Security Trust Fund.

In Washington, the Democrats often accuse the Republicans of “raiding” the Social Security Trust Fund. And the Republicans accuse the Democrats of “raiding” the Social Security Trust Fund. Both are right. Neither party has been able to resist the urge to spend the money that doesn’t belong to them.

The Seniors Center President Dan Perrin regularly answers questions from the public on Quora. Over half a million people have read his answers and he is one of Quora’s top-ranked experts on Social Security, Government, and several other issues.
https://theseniors.center/2018/06/02/has-the-u-s-congress-really-borrowed-trillions-from-social-security-to-use-for-government-spending/

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Justice101 wrote:

Has Congress really borrowed trillions from Social... (show quote)

darn good post Justice,, thank you...

Justice101

permafrost wrote:

darn good post Justice,, thank you...

Glad to pass good info your way.