Here’s one for Pegw and all those who act like “fact checkers” are “subject-matter experts” when in actual, real-life “fact” they are nothing more than propagandists!
~~~~
This is from Brucha Weisberger…
https://t***h613.substack.com/p/finally-the-t***h-fact-checkers-exposed?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2So many have been deceived by “fact checkers,”about topics of the most critical importance to their lives.
These criminal enablers have played a large role in the deadly c***d fraud. For many people, when they hear something they wonder about, their reflexive reaction - instead of doing real research and using critical thinking - is to simply google the info and see what the “fact checkers” say. What made anyone assume the fact checkers are trustworthy?
If only I could be a fact checker, I would have a megaphone for the t***h. The world would finally believe me! 😂 But Bill Gates and Pharma would never hire me for the job.
I am very grateful to Texas Lindsay for showcasing for the public exactly how (un)reliable the fact checkers are, and to Mark Crispin Miller for republishing her thread, which is where I found it. Go through the whole thing, it’s worth it.
~~~~
This is from TexasLindsay…
https://twitter.com/TexasLindsay_/status/1609663499549941763?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=emailTexasLindsay_
1. Meet Jeff. For what it’s worth, Jeff looks like a nice guy. I’m even willing to bet that Jeff wakes up everyday and tries his best to do his job, despite his shortcomings and lack of credentials to do so.
2. You see, Jeff is a “Fact-Checker” for Politifact and gets paid to discredit C***d misinformation. So one might ask what are Jeff’s qualification?
Is Jeff a Doctor? No.
Is Jeff a Scientist? No.
Does he have a PhD? No.
Does he have medical experience? No.
3. Jeff is for all intents and purposes a wordsmith. Alongside a profile picture of him as a dog, is a list of his journalistic contributions and associations.
4. Like I said before, Jeff is probably a nice guy, but Jeff is just one of many in an epidemic of ‘False Fact-Checking Prophets’ who are plaguing society right now. Each of whom are paid to discredit inconvenient t***hs and mislead the public.
5. For instance, take a look this fact-check by Jeff as a recent example of his work. Jeff rated this tweet as “FALSE”: The Tweet vs. The Fact Check
6. So how did Jeff arrive at the “False” conclusion? Well, weirdly it’s unclear since the evidence he presented to supposedly support a “False” claim, directly contradicts his conclusion and actually verifies the original
7. Now one might ask: —Are ‘False Fact-Checking Prophets’ just totally inept? Or —Are ‘False Fact-Checking Prophets’ relying on the ineptitude of the public? Some could likely make a case for either, or both for that matter.
8. There’s also another recent fact-check that was also concluded as “False” by Jeff. This claim was regarding a social media post insinuating that clots/strokes in athletes was likely a side effect of the v*****es.
9. One of the athletes mentioned had a stroke due to a blood clot. So did Jeff find evidence proving it wasn’t caused by a C•19 v*****e? No. Doctors said they weren’t able to determine a cause. So how can the v*****e be ruled out? It can’t. Therefore Jeff lied by omission.
10. And another of the athletes aforementioned, doesn’t support his false label either—and further validates he should have labeled it as inconclusive/unknown since Jeff was unable to explicitly rule out if the blood clots in her lungs were caused by the C•19 shot or not.
11. If Jeff was a pathologist, vaccinologist or treated any of the athletes, then we might view it as his medical opinion, but he’s not.
Sadly, Jeff acts as a propagandist, discrediting inconvenient t***hs at the expense of misleading the public. #DefundFactCheckers
12. This thread in a Substack:
https://texaslindsay.substack.com/p/meet-jeff/comments?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2