TommyRadd wrote:
“ On the eve of the 2020 p**********l e******n, 51 individuals formerly associated with the U.S. intelligence community falsely claimed that H****r B***n’s laptop was a Russian disinformation operation. We now know that America’s frontline counterintelligence agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigations, not only knew the t***h, but conspired to conceal it.
“And the t***h is that the “hard drive from Hell” was actually proof that Joe Biden – who was, at the time, the Democratic nominee for President – and his family had knowingly taken money from former leaders of the intelligence services of our mortal enemy: the Chinese C*******t Party”
https://presentdangerchina.org/an-experienced-spys-assessment-joe-biden-is-a-controlled-asset-of-the-ccp/And this is why none of you l*****ts who support this regime can be trusted by those of us who love America and it’s founding values which are the foundation of American exceptionalism. You not only don’t have enough discernment to see what is going on, but you continue to defend and support the Democrat Party as if they were your saviors, when in fact their agenda is to t***sform this country into just another controllable third world banana republic.
You have been shown this many times on this board, and still you refuse to open your eyes to see.
“ On the eve of the 2020 p**********l e******n, 51... (
show quote)
More quotes from the above…
“ Frank Gaffney: [00:08:25] The point that you’ve made, Sam, as an intelligence professional, is there a distinction between having approached, or even recruited a targeted individual, as part of an influence operation or, well, outright espionage, and controlling them. Using that distinction, would you conclude – based on what we know – that [00:09:00] Joe Biden was not only targeted, was not only approached, was not only presumably the beneficiary of at least some of this largesse from the Chinese C*******t Party, laundered through his son, laundered perhaps through his brother or others, but that he is controlled by the Chinese C*******t Party, as well?
Sam Faddis: [00:09:22] Yes, that is my professional opinion. He was targeted and he is controlled. Now, two points. One is, I mean, the average lay person doesn’t think in these terms, and there’s no reason they should. But this is the objective of all human intelligence operations. It’s not about, maybe I’ll blackmail this dude later, which quite frankly, is rarely done, not a particularly effective method and so forth. It’s not about, maybe he’ll do me a favor later. That’s not an intel operation. That’s what State Department does, give somebody a grant and hope [00:10:00] that they steer in our direction.
Now, this is about, a guy gets money and wh**ever else he gets. And he dances to the tune that is played….How that actually works face-to-face, that depends on the personalities involved. But, it doesn’t change the fact that the asset, who in this case would be Joe Biden, ultimately does what he is told to do on behalf of the people who [00:10:30] have purchased him.
Now, that is how espionage works. Maybe that is not the way it’s portrayed in the movies, but that is what espionage is all about. At CIA,
if your asset doesn’t satisfy the criteria for being controlled, he is not an asset. He is not recognized as an asset. So…
Frank Gaffney: [00:10:52] And in fact could prove to be a liability to you in the end. No?
Sam Faddis: [00:10:57]
No professional, serious intelligence organization wants to maintain contact with an asset who will not accept being controlled because he may be a liability because you don’t know which direction he’s going. You don’t really know what side he’s playing for….
Access to all the information we’re talking about in terms of H****r B***n’s laptop has been in the possession of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for three years now, long before the e******n. [00:11:30] The only thing that we know that they have attempted to do for sure is stop the American people from knowing anything about it…
Frank Gaffney: [00:11:40] And prosecuting people who had brought it to the public attention.
Sam Faddis: [00:11:44] Yes, exactly. So, they’ve done their best to crush anybody who wants to pursue this. Now, even if you want to say, okay, Sam, look, I get your assessment, I respect your assessment, wh**ever, but I disagree. [00:12:00] How could any reasonable intelligence or counterintelligence professional look at this information and not recognize immediately the screaming threat and possibility that the Chinese c*******ts are about to install a guy in the highest office of the land? And we got to know one way or the other for sure, folks: Which side is he playing for?
So,
the one thing you could not possibly justify [00:12:30] would be throwing this in a drawer and forgetting about it. You got to run this to ground. You have to know what the answer is.”/end quote