Maybe maga pols, pundits and opp gun nuts should think about this (Page 2): Where most people go wrong with polls is how the question is asked. Any sweeping gun control law is not the...

Weswill

Rinaldi wrote:

Of course thes usual gun toting and bible thumpers will say polls don't matter and are r****d

Of course they are all mental giants in dealing with reality

https://www.newsmax.com/us/gallup-poll-gun-laws/2022/11/21/id/1097359/

Where most people go wrong with polls is how the question is asked. Any sweeping gun control law is not the answer. What we need is the sharing of information about people who are mentally unstable to be allowed to purchase a gun as well as past offenders and anyone who has a past of violence. We lack this now. This or any solution will not completely end gun violence but it would at least keep guns away from more people that do not need to have guns. Most proposed gun laws seem to want to limit the types of guns or the capacity of magazines and do little or nothing about the people who acquire these guns when they should not. We should concentrate more on the people than on the guns.

manning5 Loc: Richmond, VA

Weswill wrote:

Where most people go wrong with polls is how the q... (show quote)

==============================

The sticking point seems to be sharing medical information that would limit anyone's access to guns. Doctors do not want to cooperate here because they fear massive lawsuits if they do. I applaud your emphasis on people!

microphor Loc: Home is TN

Weswill wrote:

Where most people go wrong with polls is how the q... (show quote)

Agree.

microphor Loc: Home is TN

manning5 wrote:

==============================

The sticking point seems to be sharing medical information that would limit anyone's access to guns. Doctors do not want to cooperate here because they fear massive lawsuits if they do. I applaud your emphasis on people!

There has to be a point when protecting the greater whole, the innocent, supercedes the individual. And it wouldn't have to be sharing the dx, it could just be sharing info that person is not eligible for gun ownership. We do that with drivers licenses to some degree, rather a person loss the driving privilege due to excessive speeding, DUI, recklessness.

manning5 Loc: Richmond, VA

microphor wrote:

There has to be a point when protecting the greater whole, the innocent, supercedes the individual. And it wouldn't have to be sharing the dx, it could just be sharing info that person is not eligible for gun ownership. We do that with drivers licenses to some degree, rather a person loss the driving privilege due to excessive speeding, DUI, recklessness.

====================

Still a touchy point. Lawyers would investigate, and if there was even a verbal opinion expfressed, a lawsuit would be forthcoming.

microphor Loc: Home is TN

manning5 wrote:

====================

Still a touchy point. Lawyers would investigate, and if there was even a verbal opinion expfressed, a lawsuit would be forthcoming.

I hear ya but epileptic and people who have sezures are banned from driving, don't know why we can't have a national registry that doesn't list specifics but can be access by gun stores

Justice101

microphor wrote:

I hear ya but epileptic and people who have sezures are banned from driving, don't know why we can't have a national registry that doesn't list specifics but can be access by gun stores

They can't ask you if you take certain legal medications for gun purchases. That would be against HIPAA privacy. I'm sure if they could, they would ask for a pee test to see if a person is lying about the illegal drugs.

manning5 Loc: Richmond, VA

Justice101 wrote:

They can't ask you if you take certain legal medications for gun purchases. That would be against HIPAA privacy. I'm sure if they could, they would ask for a pee test to see if a person is lying about the illegal drugs.

=========================

The problem is damned serious, but if it could have been done that way, don't you think it would have by now? Well, they want to blame the guns, you know, those automatics that roam the streets burrrrroping and k*****g? Those small, black weapons that just can't resist putting holes in people? Hard to catch, too, on a dark night. They slither away in the alleys.

Justice101

manning5 wrote:

=========================

The problem is damned serious, but if it could have been done that way, don't you think it would have by now? Well, they want to blame the guns, you know, those automatics that roam the streets burrrrroping and k*****g? Those small, black weapons that just can't resist putting holes in people? Hard to catch, too, on a dark night. They slither away in the alleys.

What about the creepy families that won't accept responsibility for the actions of their mentally deranged children? Take for example the 22-year-old Highland Park, IL mass shooter, Robert Crimo III. He had a record of domestic violence, and it was ignored by the police and brushed aside by his dysfunctional family. His father helped him buy one of the guns that k**led the people on the 4th of July parade after he had a history of threatening his family with knives. We haven't heard any charges against the i***t father, have we? The mother was supposedly neglectful as well pertaining to Robert's well-being.

Big Kahuna

liberalh****r wrote:

Why..... we have new shooting ranges, some call them gay bars.... tomato..tomato

No club Q....shame, now you need a new hobby for Saturday nights.

Giggles

Club Q and all such bars should be shut down. There are too many social and communicable diseases being spread around and Monkey Pox is one of the primary sexually t***smitted diseases. If the gay crowd wants to talk about how they are being murdered, look no further than the toxic W***n clot shots that about 100% of them have taken with it causing thousands of their fellow gays deaths. Look no further than Slo joe's/ovommit's W***n toxic jab as the primary cause of gay peoples deaths. Maybe these 2 yokels need rounded up and charged with murder.

Big Kahuna

microphor wrote:

Oh no Winky, you want them to hold the criminals responsible for their acts instead of an inanimate object or a victim. What is the world coming to, the dems will s**t themselves if you expect them to penalize "liberal criminals"!!

Big Kahuna

Salvatore wrote:

What exactly are stricter gun laws? Across the Uni... (show quote)

As Jessie Jackson once said, "I would rather come across a group of men at night coming out of a prayer and Bible studying meeting than come across 5 gang members leaving one of their gang meetings". I'm sure even a heathen like Rinaldi would prefer the same as Jackson.

Big Kahuna

Justice101 wrote:

They can't ask you if you take certain legal medications for gun purchases. That would be against HIPAA privacy. I'm sure if they could, they would ask for a pee test to see if a person is lying about the illegal drugs.

Why not? Our country discriminated against those who did not want to take the W***n toxic clot shot and were not allowed entry into bars, restaurants, sporting events and concerts. Did this violate HIPAA laws? It surely did. Asking people for their private medical info is illegal, but our city, state and federal elites broke those laws at their whim. C***d Passports were illegal and broke all HIPAA laws.

Dan the man

Wickedestoldwolf wrote:

What part of "Criminals don't give a f!?$# ab... (show quote)

Totally true ....I'm with you on this!

son of witless

Rinaldi wrote:

Of course thes usual gun toting and bible thumpers will say polls don't matter and are r****d

Of course they are all mental giants in dealing with reality

https://www.newsmax.com/us/gallup-poll-gun-laws/2022/11/21/id/1097359/

When 331 million Americans care what 1,000 surveyed think, call me back.