BBZ wrote:
You are complaining that Democrats thought that violence would follow the midterm e******ns? A precedent was set on J****** 6th. Acting responsibly and not resorting to violence is not a huge accomplishment, it is the way politics is supposed to work.
No, precedent was set long before J** 6, remember the r**ts after T***p w*n?
""From November 9–12, 2016, protests occurred in Oakland, California, against the e******n of Donald Trump. While originally peaceful, these protests became violent, with protesters lighting trash cans and cars and a building on fire and smashing store windows and throwing bottles at police.
In Oakland alone, the Police Department said, the crowd grew from about 3,000 people at 7 p.m. to 6,000 an hour later. The situation grew tense late Wednesday, with SFGate.com reporting that a group of protesters had started small fires in the street and broken windows. Police officers in r**t gear were called in, and at least one officer was injured, according to other local news reports.
Some protesters sprayed graffiti on cars and buildings and destroyed shop windows, local media in Portland reported.
As thousands of people marched, some vandalised shop windows, lit firec*****rs and set waste bins on fire.
Dozens in Minneapolis marched on to Interstate 94, blocking traffic in both directions for at least an hour as police stood by.""""
There's more, if you want to revisit that time, just look it up