It's not enough to beat Trumpism, 2 espionage charges ought to do the trick, Prison bus Orange Man.
Nov 13, 2022 09:22:32 #
336Robin
Loc: North Carolina
He's been asking for everything he's getting and its getting very near the end of the road.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/doj-now-looking-at-two-espionage-cases-as-they-ponder-possible-trump-indictments-legal-analyst/ar-AA142ahB?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=d766a0bd2a7f4c88aee5832f41663619#comments
DOJ now looking at two espionage cases as they ponder possible Trump indictments: legal analyst
Tom Boggioni - Yesterday 9:07 AM
594 Comments
During an appearance on MSNBC's "The Katie Phang Show," former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade explained why a report on how the Department of Justice is working diligently on how to prosecute Donald Trump for espionage indicates that investigators have the goods on the former president.
On Friday an MSNBC report stated a case in Hawaii and one in Kansas City that led to espionage charges are both being scrutinized for tips on how to pursue a Trump indictment, explaining it is "a major part of the calculus for Justice Department officials as they decide whether to move forward with charges against the former president over the classified documents found in his Florida home."
According to McQuade, that means things have grown more serious for the former president.
"There are two questions that prosecutors ask themselves when deciding whether to bring charges," the former prosecutor began. "The first is: can we charge? That is, is there sufficient evidence to prove the case? That's the first question, but then there's that second question: should we bring a case? That's when the government looks to whether or not there's a federal -- substantial evidence to bring a case."
"We want to have uniformity in the kind of cases you prosecute," she elaborated. "In cases involving the mishandling of classified documents, typically prosecutors look for some aggravating factor beyond just mishandling. If you innocently bring home a document in your briefcase, typically that is not prosecuted. you might be disciplined. you might lose your clearance you might lose your job, but probably not be criminally prosecuted."
"It's some of those factors that she mentioned in the Hawaii case and others, whether the person acted willfully, that is they knew they were violating the law," she told the host, "Whether they were disloyal to the United States, sold them to a foreign government for example, or whether they obstructed justice."
"That's probably the factor that is most salient in the Trump investigation," she concluded.
Watch below or at the link:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/doj-now-looking-at-two-espionage-cases-as-they-ponder-possible-trump-indictments-legal-analyst/ar-AA142ahB?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=d766a0bd2a7f4c88aee5832f41663619#comments
DOJ now looking at two espionage cases as they ponder possible Trump indictments: legal analyst
Tom Boggioni - Yesterday 9:07 AM
594 Comments
During an appearance on MSNBC's "The Katie Phang Show," former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade explained why a report on how the Department of Justice is working diligently on how to prosecute Donald Trump for espionage indicates that investigators have the goods on the former president.
On Friday an MSNBC report stated a case in Hawaii and one in Kansas City that led to espionage charges are both being scrutinized for tips on how to pursue a Trump indictment, explaining it is "a major part of the calculus for Justice Department officials as they decide whether to move forward with charges against the former president over the classified documents found in his Florida home."
According to McQuade, that means things have grown more serious for the former president.
"There are two questions that prosecutors ask themselves when deciding whether to bring charges," the former prosecutor began. "The first is: can we charge? That is, is there sufficient evidence to prove the case? That's the first question, but then there's that second question: should we bring a case? That's when the government looks to whether or not there's a federal -- substantial evidence to bring a case."
"We want to have uniformity in the kind of cases you prosecute," she elaborated. "In cases involving the mishandling of classified documents, typically prosecutors look for some aggravating factor beyond just mishandling. If you innocently bring home a document in your briefcase, typically that is not prosecuted. you might be disciplined. you might lose your clearance you might lose your job, but probably not be criminally prosecuted."
"It's some of those factors that she mentioned in the Hawaii case and others, whether the person acted willfully, that is they knew they were violating the law," she told the host, "Whether they were disloyal to the United States, sold them to a foreign government for example, or whether they obstructed justice."
"That's probably the factor that is most salient in the Trump investigation," she concluded.
Watch below or at the link:
Nov 13, 2022 11:15:56 #
Nov 13, 2022 11:21:46 #
336Robin wrote:
He's been asking for everything he's getting and i... (show quote)
As usual, you present an op/ed by another brainless Liberal and call it evidence. I present actual court decisions and you don't even bother to read them. I know, you couldn't find anyone to explain the big words.
Nov 13, 2022 14:37:33 #
336Robin wrote:
He's been asking for everything he's getting and i... (show quote)
Dead horse.
We've moved on.
Nov 13, 2022 18:13:36 #
Strycker
Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
336Robin wrote:
He's been asking for everything he's getting and i... (show quote)
But, but, if you take Trump out before 2024 how will you win the 2024 e******n? You have nothing to run on except beat Trump. Democrats need Trump to run.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.