One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
US ranks last in e******n integrity. Why??
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Nov 12, 2022 10:36:54   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/articles/2020-10-07/us-e******ns-compare-poorly-to-other-democracies-research-shows

Reply
Nov 12, 2022 11:07:40   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/articles/2020-10-07/us-e******ns-compare-poorly-to-other-democracies-research-shows


Unfortunately not a shock.

Reply
Nov 12, 2022 11:17:46   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
JFlorio wrote:
Unfortunately not a shock.


I know. It is very sad and is leading to our destruction. It certainly is eating away at our way of life.

Reply
 
 
Nov 12, 2022 11:22:58   #
pegw
 
US News and World report leans slightly left and has a high degree of reliability. Just remember that the Democrats had a bill in Congress to insure more reliable v****g, and the Republicans blocked it.

Reply
Nov 12, 2022 11:26:31   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
pegw wrote:
US News and World report leans slightly left and has a high degree of reliability. Just remember that the Democrats had a bill in Congress to insure more reliable v****g, and the Republicans blocked it.


Such a dimwit. They want to federalize e******ns. The stupidity you show is amazing.

Reply
Nov 12, 2022 11:32:16   #
American Vet
 
pegw wrote:
US News and World report leans slightly left and has a high degree of reliability. Just remember that the Democrats had a bill in Congress to insure more reliable v****g, and the Republicans blocked it.


Weak-minded ELWNJ response - attack the source.

A democrat bill to 'insure more reliable v****g'? Couldn't find it - need something more substantial than you.

Reply
Nov 12, 2022 11:33:53   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
American Vet wrote:
Weak-minded ELWNJ response - attack the source.

A democrat bill to 'insure more reliable v****g'? Couldn't find it - need something more substantial than you.


I wonder if these stupid progressives have ever had an original thought?

Reply
 
 
Nov 12, 2022 12:03:35   #
okie don
 
Hillary Good- sell uranium to Russia.
Orange man Bad -Friends with Russia want no wars..

Biden - Good Sell.reserve oil to China.
Biden - Good. Want nuclear war with Russia.

Democrats have screws loose somewhere and unable to add 2+2.
Maybe 3 rd grade educations?

Reply
Nov 12, 2022 12:37:00   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
American Vet wrote:
Weak-minded ELWNJ response - attack the source.

A democrat bill to 'insure more reliable v****g'? Couldn't find it - need something more substantial than you.


It was their v****g reform bill that would insure that only democrats ever got elected from then on.

Reply
Nov 12, 2022 12:38:02   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
okie don wrote:
Hillary Good- sell uranium to Russia.
Orange man Bad -Friends with Russia want no wars..

Biden - Good Sell.reserve oil to China.
Biden - Good. Want nuclear war with Russia.

Democrats have screws loose somewhere and unable to add 2+2.
Maybe 3 rd grade educations?


The left (dems) - 2+2=4 is r****t!!

Reply
Nov 12, 2022 13:11:54   #
Weswill
 
pegw wrote:
US News and World report leans slightly left and has a high degree of reliability. Just remember that the Democrats had a bill in Congress to insure more reliable v****g, and the Republicans blocked it.


E******n laws and how to run an e******n goes through the states' legislatures. Not Congress. So anything that Congress passes on e******n laws and procedures will be unconstitutional.

Reply
 
 
Nov 12, 2022 15:52:58   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
pegw wrote:
US News and World report leans slightly left and has a high degree of reliability. Just remember that the Democrats had a bill in Congress to insure more reliable v****g, and the Republicans blocked it.


The respondents clearly did not read the article, which called for more centralized control of e******ns (instead of 50 different e******n administrations), and less litigation (in other words, the losers conceding when they lost), among other reforms. I don't know if newsweek is l*****t or not, but the authors were writing pre 2020, and that e******n certainly proved their points. Slates of 'alternate e*****rs' do not lead to e******n integrity.

E******n integrity is not high on the list of issues for Trump supporters, unless 'integrity' is redefined as Republicans winning all races all the time. They are interested in establishing a one party state, that is all.Then e******ns will have integrity, according to them.

Reply
Nov 12, 2022 15:55:56   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Wrong. You’re so indoctrinated you’d trust the bureaucrats in D.C. to run f**r e******ns. Brilliant. In a Democratic Republic we have the right, and obligation to challenge e******ns when there are irregularities.

working class stiff wrote:
The respondents clearly did not read the article, which called for more centralized control of e******ns (instead of 50 different e******n administrations), and less litigation (in other words, the losers conceding when they lost), among other reforms. I don't know if newsweek is l*****t or not, but the authors were writing pre 2020, and that e******n certainly proved their points. Slates of 'alternate e*****rs' do not lead to e******n integrity.

E******n integrity is not high on the list of issues for Trump supporters, unless 'integrity' is redefined as Republicans winning all races all the time. They are interested in establishing a one party state, that is all.Then e******ns will have integrity, according to them.
The respondents clearly did not read the article, ... (show quote)

Reply
Nov 12, 2022 16:16:44   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
working class stiff wrote:
The respondents clearly did not read the article, which called for more centralized control of e******ns (instead of 50 different e******n administrations), and less litigation (in other words, the losers conceding when they lost), among other reforms. I don't know if newsweek is l*****t or not, but the authors were writing pre 2020, and that e******n certainly proved their points. Slates of 'alternate e*****rs' do not lead to e******n integrity.

E******n integrity is not high on the list of issues for Trump supporters, unless 'integrity' is redefined as Republicans winning all races all the time. They are interested in establishing a one party state, that is all.Then e******ns will have integrity, according to them.
The respondents clearly did not read the article, ... (show quote)


"E******n integrity is not high on the list of issues for Trump supporters," Wut? What is that statement based on??

Reply
Nov 12, 2022 16:28:57   #
American Vet
 
working class stiff wrote:
The respondents clearly did not read the article, which called for more centralized control of e******ns (instead of 50 different e******n administrations), and less litigation (in other words, the losers conceding when they lost), among other reforms. I don't know if newsweek is l*****t or not, but the authors were writing pre 2020, and that e******n certainly proved their points. Slates of 'alternate e*****rs' do not lead to e******n integrity.

E******n integrity is not high on the list of issues for Trump supporters, unless 'integrity' is redefined as Republicans winning all races all the time. They are interested in establishing a one party state, that is all.Then e******ns will have integrity, according to them.
The respondents clearly did not read the article, ... (show quote)


ELWNJ rant and plainly opposed to the Constitution.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.