One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
What if Paul Pelosi had armed himself with a Gun?
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
Oct 30, 2022 10:00:42   #
Gatsby
 
Who do you think would have needed a hospital?

Reply
Oct 30, 2022 10:57:05   #
pegw
 
The take I see this is what if the nut job had a gun? I am sure Me Pelosi was asleep when his house was broken in to. What would have happened if the nut job had a gun. Also, why didn't they have burgeler alarms?

Reply
Oct 30, 2022 10:57:52   #
pegw
 
The take I see this is what if the nut job had a gun? I am sure Me Pelosi was asleep when his house was broken in to. What would have happened if the nut job had a gun. Also, why didn't they have burgelar alarms?

Reply
 
 
Oct 30, 2022 11:32:05   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Gatsby wrote:
Who do you think would have needed a hospital?


His gay lover???

Reply
Oct 30, 2022 11:32:50   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
pegw wrote:
The take I see this is what if the nut job had a gun? I am sure Me Pelosi was asleep when his house was broken in to. What would have happened if the nut job had a gun. Also, why didn't they have burgelar alarms?


They had burglar alarms...

Those don't go off when you invite your gay lover into your house...

Reply
Oct 30, 2022 12:01:33   #
Tiptop789 Loc: State of Denial
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
His gay lover???


Your pathetic, trying to change the course of the assault? How do you know the assailant was a male, maybe a woman dressed as a man? He was still assaulted, right?

Reply
Oct 30, 2022 12:01:56   #
Tiptop789 Loc: State of Denial
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
They had burglar alarms...

Those don't go off when you invite your gay lover into your house...


And you know this how?

Reply
 
 
Oct 30, 2022 12:14:18   #
vernon
 
Tiptop789 wrote:
And you know this how?


they are telling just so much, you have to read between the lines.It came out yesterday that they knew each other.
I'd bet a dollar they had a fling and the old man didn't want to pay for the services.

Reply
Oct 30, 2022 14:02:23   #
AmericanEagle Loc: Indiana
 
vernon wrote:
they are telling just so much, you have to read between the lines.It came out yesterday that they knew each other.
I'd bet a dollar they had a fling and the old man didn't want to pay for the services.


Yup and married to Nancy I’m sure causes him to look elsewhere to get his jollies!
You know there’s more to the story than they are telling us or would ever admit to.
I mean we know the Pelosi’s are corrupt crooks that I’m sure have protection but where were they? Guessing Paul was doing something he shouldn’t have.
They get to reap what they sew. Their democratic policies are responsible for all the high crime and apparently they got a dose of reality it puts America at risk and now them!
Guessing they probably won’t let that guy out the next day like they do all the other criminals. And of course naturally like we thought they try to tie him to Trump and bring up the J****** 6 i**********n because of who they are🤮👎🏻
What if Republicans tried to prop him up like the stupid Democrats did with G****e F***d and make him out to be a choir boy? Can you imagine the outrage! G****e F***d was a six time loser and hopefully he is roasting on the spit in hell

Reply
Oct 30, 2022 15:09:44   #
youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart
 
Gatsby wrote:
Who do you think would have needed a hospital?


Pelosi's gay lover!

Reply
Oct 30, 2022 15:10:51   #
son of witless
 
pegw wrote:
The take I see this is what if the nut job had a gun? I am sure Me Pelosi was asleep when his house was broken in to. What would have happened if the nut job had a gun. Also, why didn't they have burgeler alarms?


They couldn't afford it. Nancy is barely getting by on a speaker's salary.

Reply
 
 
Oct 30, 2022 23:46:33   #
Tiptop789 Loc: State of Denial
 
vernon wrote:
they are telling just so much, you have to read between the lines.It came out yesterday that they knew each other.
I'd bet a dollar they had a fling and the old man didn't want to pay for the services.


Glad you let us know

Reply
Oct 31, 2022 00:22:34   #
robertv3
 
Gatsby wrote:
Who do you think would have needed a hospital?


If Paul Pelosi had armed himself with a gun then there would be a greater likelihood that somebody would die, either in this incident or at other times.

If both Paul Pelosi and his attacker had armed themselves with guns, then this incident would almost surely have ended worse than it did.

Reply
Oct 31, 2022 00:42:02   #
robertv3
 
_Any_ fool can pull a trigger really fast. That's why I call the guns an "equalizer" -- a difference in intelligence matters less, when both sides have guns. In an armed conflict, there's a lot of power in the gun, such that power of mind has relatively less effect than it would in an unarmed encounter.

The stupider a person is, the more likely he or she is to shoot quickly without regard for whether it's unnecessary or a wrong thing to do. So it may even be true that in mutually armed situations the less ethical or less intelligent person actually gains a slight advantage over the more ethical (and therefore more intelligent) person.

But, in a lesser-armed situation (as with an unarmed Paul Pelosi and an assailant with only a hammer), intelligence still counts for something. Mr. Pelosi was able to outwit his attacker (with the phone call) and also buy a little time with physical resistance.

If they had both had guns then I think one of them would be dead and it would probably be Mr. Pelosi (who, after all, had less chance to prepare for the encounter than his attacker had).

Reply
Oct 31, 2022 03:31:24   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
robertv3 wrote:
_Any_ fool can pull a trigger really fast. That's why I call the guns an "equalizer" -- a difference in intelligence matters less, when both sides have guns. In an armed conflict, there's a lot of power in the gun, such that power of mind has relatively less effect than it would in an unarmed encounter.

The stupider a person is, the more likely he or she is to shoot quickly without regard for whether it's unnecessary or a wrong thing to do. So it may even be true that in mutually armed situations the less ethical or less intelligent person actually gains a slight advantage over the more ethical (and therefore more intelligent) person.

But, in a lesser-armed situation (as with an unarmed Paul Pelosi and an assailant with only a hammer), intelligence still counts for something. Mr. Pelosi was able to outwit his attacker (with the phone call) and also buy a little time with physical resistance.

If they had both had guns then I think one of them would be dead and it would probably be Mr. Pelosi (who, after all, had less chance to prepare for the encounter than his attacker had).
_Any_ fool can pull a trigger really fast. That's... (show quote)
How much experience do you have with firearms?
Are you a well-regulated shooter?
Have you successfully completed any kind of firearm self defense course?
Reason I ask is because it appears you don't know WTF you are talking about.

Reply
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.