Peaver Bogart Loc: Montana

https://futureworld.org/mindbullets/oil-is-not-a-fossil-fuel/

Oil comprises 85% carbon, 13% hydrogen and 0.5% oxygen with traces of sulphur and nitrogen. Most chemists used to believe it originated from the decomposition of organic matter – layers formed from the remains of dead animals. Hence the name ‘f****l f**l’. By definition its source was limited.
That theory was plausible when oil wells were drilled into the fossil layers of the Earth’s crust; but if oil comes from ‘basement rock’, a mile underground, it is well below the fossil layer.
Despite conventional wisdom around f****l f**ls, the argument for non-biologically produced oil was not a new one. In 1951, the Russian scientist N.A Kudryavtsev, announced the theory that deep petroleum was produced abiotically. His theories were consolidated with the exploration of the oil fields of Dneiper-Donets in the early 1990s.
World-renowned geologist, C Warren Hunt’s ‘Anhydride’ theory of 1996, asserted the idea of biogenesis from living microbial forms, as opposed to fossilized forms.
If oil is constantly replenishing, why should it run out?

American Vet

Interesting - thanks.

Peaver Bogart Loc: Montana

You're welcome. Here's another article about "F****l F**l".

F****l F**ls: So called "f****l f**ls" are not from fossils. Is oil, coal, natural gas and all carbon based fuels really the product of plant and other fossils that have over millions of years, t***sformed into these substances? The t***h is that it is hardly likely that so called "f****l f**ls" were ever created from plant life. Many of the oil reserves are literally oceans of hydrocarbon, far beneath the surface of the planet. When one considers that some reserves are tens of miles wide, deep and long, one begins to grasp the impossibility that these reserves are the product of fossils. Further, the depth of the oil and gas reserves underscores the impossibility that somehow fossilized plant life was the source. Another example are diamonds. Diamonds are 100% pure carbon, that according to the current theory, are formed deep below the surface of the planet, so deep in fact that it would be virtually impossible that decaying plants could possibly have ended up so deep, even if their were massive earthquakes or other dramatic, surface shifting actions.

I propose that the carbon based "f****l f**ls" are actually from gasses trapped by our gravity force, perhaps over the course of millions of years and that this methane is the real starting point of our "f****l f**ls". It is also possible that the earth was formed with substantial carbon in the mix, along with other minerals. Further, certain "f****l f**ls", such as coal may in fact form much quicker than generally realized. For example, there are cases where human tools have been founded embedded in coal deposits. There is also a curious case of an early turn of the century spark plug that was found embedded inside a coal deposit.

It is possible that there are far greater "f****l f**l" deposits than is generally accepted and perhaps "f****l f**ls" are more renewable than believed. Much of the science that we accept should be questioned and retested. -- Frank Didik, April 26, 2022

https://www.didik.com/fossil_fuels.htm

Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon

It makes more sense than piles of dead dinosaurs turning into billions of barrels of oil.

Peaver Bogart Loc: Montana

I've been saying that for years.

Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon

currahee506

"Big lizards" will not turn into fuel. Methane gas is what bloats up all dead animals in the past and the present. This substance comes from outside from somewhere else. Animal and human carcasses dry up and turn to dust. Dust is not oil.

nonalien1 Loc: Mojave Desert

I think it was John D. Rockafeller who paid a geologist to label oil as a f****l f**l to give the impression it was a limited resource. It seems once things are labeled they are seldom reexamined. People just blindly run with the narrative

Big dog

Earth creates oil out of elements deep under ground. Some of us have known that for years. The same thing is true about water!

Peaver Bogart Loc: Montana

You're right, I read that somewhere years ago.

elledee

Bribem is almost f****l f**l and just this side of compost mostly from the neck up

JRM

For a more complete exposure of the myth, the following:

Oil from the Earth Naturally and Forever
Attached file:
(Download)

Attached file:
(Download)

Peaver Bogart Loc: Montana

Very good, I just skimmed through it, I'll read it thoroughly when I have more time. At any rate, we should get rid of this 'f****l f**l' agenda.

JRM

And, furthermore, carbon isn’t the bad guy that political powers are saying it is. The contribution of CO2 in the atmosphere to the greenhouse effect is negligible … under 2%. Much more effect is from water vapor, which is elevated due to warming, so a vicious circle, but not caused by anything people do. Solar activity has much more to do with climate swings, which has been discovered over the centuries using data from ice cores and other indicators. We may be in for some serious g****l c*****g not too far down the road, which would be much more dangerous to life as we know it than a little warming. I’ll try to find the scientific article I saved a few years ago about that.