One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
CRITICAL BLOW Dealt to J****** 6 C*******e
Page 1 of 10 next> last>>
Oct 11, 2022 12:37:57   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
https://newshourfirst.com/2022/10/10/critical-blow-dealt-to-january-6-committee/?utm_source=NHF%20M4BS2&utm_medium=email&utm_content=subscriber_id:113573150&utm_campaign=CRITICAL%20BLOW%20Dealt%20to%20January%206%20Committee

Has the tide finally turned on the J****** 6 c*******e?

If a ruling from the U.S. Circuit Court for Appeals or the District of Columbia is any sign, this committee is now in danger of being disbanded.


Not only did the appeals court rule against the committee, but it also questioned its legality.

Case Dismissed

The court reversed a lower court ruling regarding subpoenas issued against the RNC.

If I am reading this right, one of the reasons was that the court felt like the committee was throwing as much out there as possible in the hopes that something would stick.

The ruling stated, “The RNC claimed that disclosure of these documents would reveal sensitive information about its digital strategy, so it sued to prevent the disclosure.

“The RNC argued that the Committee was not lawfully constituted and that the subpoena violated the First Amendment.”

It continued, “Because the Committee caused the mootness and thereby deprived us of the ability to review the district court’s decision, and given the important and unsettled constitutional questions that the appeal would have presented, we vacate the district court’s judgment.”

The constant maneuvering by the committee seemed to upset the court, with the ruling stating, “The Committee has taken various positions on whether and when it needs the subpoenaed RNC documents.”

It may only be one case and one ruling, but that was as close to a judge smacking someone in the face as you are going to see.

Just a brutal loss for the committee.

Reply
Oct 11, 2022 12:44:25   #
pegw
 
The review by Nedia bias says that News hour first was given a low reliablity rating for the usual. Lack of t***sparency, far right wing propaganda and conspiracy theories. Do not believe everything that is published. It may not be true.

Reply
Oct 11, 2022 12:49:01   #
elledee
 
pegw wrote:
The review by Nedia bias says that News hour first was given a low reliablity rating for the usual. Lack of t***sparency, far right wing propaganda and conspiracy theories. Do not believe everything that is published. It may not be true.


As usual shoot the messenger

Reply
 
 
Oct 11, 2022 12:52:41   #
American Vet
 
pegw wrote:
The review by Nedia bias says that News hour first was given a low reliablity rating for the usual. Lack of t***sparency, far right wing propaganda and conspiracy theories. Do not believe everything that is published. It may not be true.


Then you should have no trouble refuting the information.

You have yet to do so.

Seems all you can do is bleat about supposed "bias".

Reply
Oct 11, 2022 12:57:42   #
Sonny Magoo Loc: Where pot pie is boiled in a kettle
 
Ginny_Dandy wrote:
https://newshourfirst.com/2022/10/10/critical-blow-dealt-to-january-6-committee/?utm_source=NHF%20M4BS2&utm_medium=email&utm_content=subscriber_id:113573150&utm_campaign=CRITICAL%20BLOW%20Dealt%20to%20January%206%20Committee

Has the tide finally turned on the J****** 6 c*******e?

If a ruling from the U.S. Circuit Court for Appeals or the District of Columbia is any sign, this committee is now in danger of being disbanded.


Not only did the appeals court rule against the committee, but it also questioned its legality.

Case Dismissed

The court reversed a lower court ruling regarding subpoenas issued against the RNC.

If I am reading this right, one of the reasons was that the court felt like the committee was throwing as much out there as possible in the hopes that something would stick.

The ruling stated, “The RNC claimed that disclosure of these documents would reveal sensitive information about its digital strategy, so it sued to prevent the disclosure.

“The RNC argued that the Committee was not lawfully constituted and that the subpoena violated the First Amendment.”

It continued, “Because the Committee caused the mootness and thereby deprived us of the ability to review the district court’s decision, and given the important and unsettled constitutional questions that the appeal would have presented, we vacate the district court’s judgment.”

The constant maneuvering by the committee seemed to upset the court, with the ruling stating, “The Committee has taken various positions on whether and when it needs the subpoenaed RNC documents.”

It may only be one case and one ruling, but that was as close to a judge smacking someone in the face as you are going to see.

Just a brutal loss for the committee.
https://newshourfirst.com/2022/10/10/critical-blow... (show quote)


It's on it's last leg. If/when the republicans take over the legislature, it will disappear.

Reply
Oct 11, 2022 13:00:46   #
GoldBone215
 
pegw wrote:
The review by Nedia bias says that News hour first was given a low reliablity rating for the usual. Lack of t***sparency, far right wing propaganda and conspiracy theories. Do not believe everything that is published. It may not be true.


So the l*****t lunatic billionaires who control the lame stream media isn’t biased 😂😂are you enjoying your censorship inflation rising utilities and now gas and grocery prices going up even more 😫😩🥴😂😂😂

Reply
Oct 11, 2022 13:08:58   #
Peaver Bogart Loc: Montana
 
Ginny_Dandy wrote:
https://newshourfirst.com/2022/10/10/critical-blow-dealt-to-january-6-committee/?utm_source=NHF%20M4BS2&utm_medium=email&utm_content=subscriber_id:113573150&utm_campaign=CRITICAL%20BLOW%20Dealt%20to%20January%206%20Committee

Has the tide finally turned on the J****** 6 c*******e?

If a ruling from the U.S. Circuit Court for Appeals or the District of Columbia is any sign, this committee is now in danger of being disbanded.


Not only did the appeals court rule against the committee, but it also questioned its legality.

Case Dismissed

The court reversed a lower court ruling regarding subpoenas issued against the RNC.

If I am reading this right, one of the reasons was that the court felt like the committee was throwing as much out there as possible in the hopes that something would stick.

The ruling stated, “The RNC claimed that disclosure of these documents would reveal sensitive information about its digital strategy, so it sued to prevent the disclosure.

“The RNC argued that the Committee was not lawfully constituted and that the subpoena violated the First Amendment.”

It continued, “Because the Committee caused the mootness and thereby deprived us of the ability to review the district court’s decision, and given the important and unsettled constitutional questions that the appeal would have presented, we vacate the district court’s judgment.”

The constant maneuvering by the committee seemed to upset the court, with the ruling stating, “The Committee has taken various positions on whether and when it needs the subpoenaed RNC documents.”

It may only be one case and one ruling, but that was as close to a judge smacking someone in the face as you are going to see.

Just a brutal loss for the committee.
https://newshourfirst.com/2022/10/10/critical-blow... (show quote)


The Supreme Court should come down hard on all the D-Rats for all the f**e charges they tried to pull on Trump since 2015.

Reply
 
 
Oct 11, 2022 13:17:14   #
77Reaganite Loc: Athens, GA, United States
 
Ginny_Dandy wrote:
https://newshourfirst.com/2022/10/10/critical-blow-dealt-to-january-6-committee/?utm_source=NHF%20M4BS2&utm_medium=email&utm_content=subscriber_id:113573150&utm_campaign=CRITICAL%20BLOW%20Dealt%20to%20January%206%20Committee

Has the tide finally turned on the J****** 6 c*******e?

If a ruling from the U.S. Circuit Court for Appeals or the District of Columbia is any sign, this committee is now in danger of being disbanded.


Not only did the appeals court rule against the committee, but it also questioned its legality.

Case Dismissed

The court reversed a lower court ruling regarding subpoenas issued against the RNC.

If I am reading this right, one of the reasons was that the court felt like the committee was throwing as much out there as possible in the hopes that something would stick.

The ruling stated, “The RNC claimed that disclosure of these documents would reveal sensitive information about its digital strategy, so it sued to prevent the disclosure.

“The RNC argued that the Committee was not lawfully constituted and that the subpoena violated the First Amendment.”

It continued, “Because the Committee caused the mootness and thereby deprived us of the ability to review the district court’s decision, and given the important and unsettled constitutional questions that the appeal would have presented, we vacate the district court’s judgment.”

The constant maneuvering by the committee seemed to upset the court, with the ruling stating, “The Committee has taken various positions on whether and when it needs the subpoenaed RNC documents.”

It may only be one case and one ruling, but that was as close to a judge smacking someone in the face as you are going to see.

Just a brutal loss for the committee.
https://newshourfirst.com/2022/10/10/critical-blow... (show quote)



Were they finally called out for their lies and bulls**t I hope!

Reply
Oct 11, 2022 13:22:04   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
elledee wrote:
As usual shoot the messenger


👍 👍 👍 👍 👍 👍 👍

That's all she knows how to do.

Reply
Oct 11, 2022 13:24:51   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
77Reaganite wrote:
Were they finally called out for their lies and bulls**t I hope!


They got a "smack" in the face so I guess you could say the court was upset with them.

Reply
Oct 11, 2022 13:25:33   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
Peaver Bogart wrote:
The Supreme Court should come down hard on all the D-Rats for all the f**e charges they tried to pull on Trump since 2015.


👍 Wouldn't that be lovely?!?!

Reply
 
 
Oct 11, 2022 13:31:28   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
GoldBone215 wrote:
So the l*****t lunatic billionaires who control the lame stream media isn’t biased 😂😂are you enjoying your censorship inflation rising utilities and now gas and grocery prices going up even more 😫😩🥴😂😂😂


👍 👍 👍 👍 👍 You mean like this:



Reply
Oct 11, 2022 13:32:45   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
Sonny Magoo wrote:
It's on it's last leg. If/when the republicans take over the legislature, it will disappear.


Keep your fingers & toes crossed! I know the D-rats are up to something.

Reply
Oct 11, 2022 13:48:42   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
pegw wrote:
The review by Nedia bias says that News hour first was given a low reliablity rating for the usual. Lack of t***sparency, far right wing propaganda and conspiracy theories. Do not believe everything that is published. It may not be true.


***Do not believe everything that is published. It may not be true.
>>>Do not believe everything that peg posts. It may not be true.

Reply
Oct 11, 2022 13:56:52   #
JuristBooks Loc: North Carolina
 
Ginny_Dandy wrote:
https://newshourfirst.com/2022/10/10/critical-blow-dealt-to-january-6-committee/?utm_source=NHF%20M4BS2&utm_medium=email&utm_content=subscriber_id:113573150&utm_campaign=CRITICAL%20BLOW%20Dealt%20to%20January%206%20Committee

Has the tide finally turned on the J****** 6 c*******e?

If a ruling from the U.S. Circuit Court for Appeals or the District of Columbia is any sign, this committee is now in danger of being disbanded.


Not only did the appeals court rule against the committee, but it also questioned its legality.

Case Dismissed

The court reversed a lower court ruling regarding subpoenas issued against the RNC.

If I am reading this right, one of the reasons was that the court felt like the committee was throwing as much out there as possible in the hopes that something would stick.

The ruling stated, “The RNC claimed that disclosure of these documents would reveal sensitive information about its digital strategy, so it sued to prevent the disclosure.

“The RNC argued that the Committee was not lawfully constituted and that the subpoena violated the First Amendment.”

It continued, “Because the Committee caused the mootness and thereby deprived us of the ability to review the district court’s decision, and given the important and unsettled constitutional questions that the appeal would have presented, we vacate the district court’s judgment.”

The constant maneuvering by the committee seemed to upset the court, with the ruling stating, “The Committee has taken various positions on whether and when it needs the subpoenaed RNC documents.”

It may only be one case and one ruling, but that was as close to a judge smacking someone in the face as you are going to see.

Just a brutal loss for the committee.
https://newshourfirst.com/2022/10/10/critical-blow... (show quote)





Reply
Page 1 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.