Don G. Dinsdale Loc: El Cajon, CA (San Diego County)

The crying shame is she and the other educated B****s understand what Liberal Socialism has done to their people and the Country... To coin a phrase, Welfare is Uncle Sugars S***e Plantation... The problem is they have no idea how to get off the Plantation, maybe the very system that ens***ed them could get them off with forced education and drug testing with absence (in essence we would be paying them to get educated & off drugs), then the Check... Now there would be a formula to gradually reduce the amount of Welfare as their income increased over a given period... This would end up coast less than the years upon years of continued dependence on Uncle Sugar... Don D.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

TOWNHALL MAGAZINE

Here are three Gifted Columnist who happen to be Black, writing about the modern Black experience in America...


B****s Must Embrace Freedom, Learn, and Progress

By: Star Parker / Nov 08, 2014

I am a conservative. I believe in the t***h of traditional values, of limited government, and free markets.

And I believe in personal freedom and that it is not possible without all the above.

Our country has been going in the opposite direction and things, predictably, have not been going well.

The American people spoke last Tuesday, and I am happy with what they had to say.

But I am also happy that we have, once again, proof that America is still a free country. That when the American people are not happy, they can v**e for change.

This is a great thing.

But best is when we use this precious gift of freedom to learn and to grow.

Freedom means making inevitable mistakes, learning from them, changing and improving.

This points to two watershed events of this e******n. E******n of the first black Republican woman to the US House of Representatives, Mia Love of Utah, and the first black Senator from the South elected since reconstruction, Tim Scott of South Carolina.

Why should I raise the issue of race when both these newly elected members of congress have made it a point to reject race as an issue in their campaigns?

In a post-e******n interview on CNN, when the issue of race was raised, Congresswoman-elect Love said, “This has nothing to do with race…I wasn’t elected because of the color of my skin, I wasn’t elected because of my g****r. I was elected because of the solutions that I put on the table….”

In a post-e******n interview with Glenn Beck, Senator Scott deplored the “race-baiting” of the Democratic Party during the e******n and said he is proud that “people in South Carolina v**e their issues, v**e their values, and not their complexion.”

So why do I even bother to bring up the news about two new black Republican members of congress?

I do in hope that b***k A******ns across our nation will look at these two individuals, listen to what they have to say, and more will choose to embrace their message about the importance and beauty of freedom.

As noted above, freedom is about learning from mistakes and growing.

B***k A******ns have suffered greatly living under the thumb of government and believing it is a good thing. But if it truly is a good thing then, today, a half-century after the passage of the Civil Rights Act in 1964, huge differences would not persist in average income, wealth, employment, and education between b***k A******ns and the rest of the nation.

B***k A******ns, like all Americans, are free. But b****s must step up and use this freedom to learn. It is time to take a different path. Embrace the freedom, and the personal responsibility that goes with it, that was achieved 50 years ago.

Again in the words of Senator Scott, in response to being told that he was graded “F” by the NAACP. “….I believe progress has to be made and the government is not the answer for progress. I was a kid growing up in poverty. I had a mentor who was a Chick-fil-A operator named John Moniz who taught me that the brilliance of the American economy happens through business ownership and entrepreneurial spirit…success is possible if you, a/have a good education and b/ have a strong work ethic.”

Or Mia Love at the 2012 Republican convention: “My parents immigrated to the U.S. with ten dollars in their pocket, believing that the America they heard about really did exist….When the going got tough, they didn’t look to Washington, they looked within.”

This is not a time for pointing fingers, for blame.

This is a time to rejoice in the blessings of freedom that Americans have and to pray that more Americans, and particularly B***k A******ns, embrace it.

Obama: Irrelevant, Incompetent, or Intentional?

Ken Blackwell / Nov 08, 2014

“Remember,” said Ronald Reagan, “we have opponents; we don’t have enemies.”

That’s why President Reagan was so successful in gaining the respect and affection of the American people. Even people who did not like his policies liked him.

President Obama’s troubles in office stem in no small part from is willingness to treat American opponents as enemies. (He treats America’s true enemies as friends, but that’s another matter.)

The readout from E******n Day is that Mr. Obama’s Democrats suffered “a massacre.”

That word from Britain’s prestigious Economist is being used even as Christians and Muslims in Syria and Iraq are suffering genuine massacres at the hands of ISIS.

Still, we can soberly describe the Mid-term E******ns as a rout, as a massive rejection of President Obama’s policies, if not the president himself. He had told v**ers that his policies—“every one of them”—would be on the b****t this November. He also told v**ers that the endangered Democratic incumbents “v**e with me.” As a result of Tuesday’s massive rejection, those folks will v**e with him no longer.

The popular analysis of all this is not that President Obama is “irrelevant.” Alaska’s Mark Begich tried to save his seat by that absurd description of the Chief Executive. It didn’t work. But there is a growing consensus—especially among conservatives-- that Mr. Obama is “incompetent.”

But what if President Obama is, instead, intentional? He has said it again and again. He told interviewers he would rather be “a consequential one termer” than an inconsequential two-term president. He was echoing his previous remarks during the 2008 campaign when he paid a left-handed compliment to Ronald Reagan. He said then that the 40th president had “changed the trajectory of the country” in ways that Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton had not.

We should take Barack Obama at his word. He Said He Wanted To “Fundamentally T***sform This Nation.” He pledged in his 2009 Inaugural Address “To Remake America.”

Let’s remember the bitter joke of C*******t playwright Bertolt Brecht. When it appeared clear the workers of East Germany were rejecting their Marxist proletarian paradise, Brecht said the party bosses would simply have to “elect a new people.”

This is what, in all seriousness, Barack Obama is doing. He is planning to go ahead with an Executive Order to make millions of new Americans of the i*****l a***ns currently residing here. He will probably stiff-arm Congress and act in defiance of the Constitution and the laws. He will probably nominate a new Attorney General—and press a lame-duck Senate to ram through the confirmation v**e.

Socialism is inherently undemocratic. Its adherents believe they are “on the right side of history” and thus they feel entitled, empowered even, to bend and break the rules in order to achieve an ever-greater central control over Americans’ lives.

Now that the celebratory champagne has lost its fizz, we need to soberly assess where we stand with this administration. President Obama can veto any repeal of Obamacare. He still maintains control over college student loans. Common Core (fairly dubbed “Obamacore”) is still advancing despite fierce grassroots opposition. He is still converting a severely weakened military into a laboratory for radical social experimentation. He is packing the federal judiciary with radicals. He will rely on these black-robed rogue judges to force the changes he wants but cannot achieve through legislation. He is staffing the federal bureaucracy with his dev**ees—and creating new “Czars” not subject to Senate confirmation. He will use Executive Orders to limit or even frustrate the intent of Congress on major issues.

In foreign policy, he is presiding over the recessional of American power and influence in the world. In order to achieve socialism at home, America must only“lead from behind” abroad. He has said we are only “exceptional” in the same sense that Britain, Greece and every other nation regards itself as exceptional. With this exception: He has publicly apologized to the world for America’s perceived t***sgressions.

It is good that the v**ers came out in their millions to try to pull the country back from the brink. But President Barack Obama is a most serious adversary. He knows what he wants and he knows how to get it.

There’s another reason to reject the “incompetence” label. President Obama is telling B***k A******ns that he is the victim of r****m, that opposition to his policies is the result of opposition to his historic status. The more conservatives cry “incompetent,” the more we feed into that liberal narrative. And the stronger support he gets in the Black community, the better able he will be to pursue policies we sincerely believe are injurious to the Black community itself as well as to the majority of all Americans.

V***r F***d and V**er I.D.

Thomas Sowell / Nov 04, 2014

One of the biggest v***r f***ds may be the idea promoted by Attorney General Eric Holder and others that there is no v***r f***d, that laws requiring v**ers to have a photo identification are just attempts to suppress black v****g.

Reporter John Fund has written three books on v***r f***d and a recent survey by Old D******n University indicates that there are more than a million registered v**ers who are not citizens, and who therefore are not legally entitled to v**e.

The most devastating account of v***r f***d may be in the book "Injustice" by J. Christian Adams. He was a Justice Department attorney, who detailed with inside knowledge the v***r f***ds known to the Justice Department, and ignored by Attorney General Holder and Company.

One of these frauds involved sending out absentee b****ts to people who had never asked for them. Then a political operator would show up -- uninvited -- the day the b****ts arrived and "help" the v**er to fill them out. Sometimes the intruders simply took the b****ts, filled them out and forged the signatures of the v**ers.

These were illegal v**es for Democrats, which may well be why Eric Holder sees no evil, hears no evil and speaks no evil.

As for race-based "v**er suppression," amid all the political hysteria, how many hard facts have you heard? Probably none that supports that claim. Widely available free photo identification cards mean that poverty is no barrier to v****g.

Since b****s and w****s both have to show photo I.D. for everything from cashing checks to getting on a plane, why has requiring a photo I.D. for v****g caused such shrill outcries?

Unfortunately, this is part of the cynical politics of promoting as much racial polarization and paranoia as possible, in hopes of getting more black v**ers to turn out to v**e for the Democrats.

Nothing is too gross when promoting racial hysteria in an e******n year. Veteran Democrat Congressman Charlie Rangel from Harlem declared that Republicans "don't disagree -- they h**e!" According to Rangel, "Some of them believe that s***ery isn't over and that they won the Civil War!"

Republicans did win the Civil War. That's why there is no more s***ery. It was a Republican president who issued the Emancipation Proclamation. It was a Republican-controlled Congress that v**ed for the 13th Amendment, outlawing s***ery.

In the 1960s, a higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats v**ed for the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the V****g Rights Act of 1965. If we are going to talk about history, let's at least get the facts right.

Only an utter ignorance of history, in this era of dumbed-down education, could allow demagogues like Rangel to get away with the absurdities that abound in e******n year politics.

Images of lynching and Jim Crow laws that made b****s sit in the back of buses are used against Republicans, even though the "solid South" was solidly controlled by Democrats during that era.

Bull Connor, who turned police dogs and fire hoses on civil rights demonstrators, was a Democrat. So were other Southern segregationists. In those days, you could go hundreds of miles through the Jim Crow South without seeing a single Republican official. That is why political observers called it "the solid South."

Perhaps the biggest v***r f***d of all is the fraud against black v**ers, by telling them bogeyman stories, in order to try to get them to come out on e******n day to v**e for Democrats.

The most cynical of these bogeyman ploys is Attorney General Holder's threats of legal action against schools that discipline a "disproportionate" number of black boys. Unless you believe that black boys cannot possibly be misbehaving more often than Asian American girls, what does this political numbers game accomplish?

It creates another racial grievance, allowing Democrats like Holder to pose as rescuers of b****s from r****t dangers. The real danger is allowing disruptive students in ghetto schools to destroy the education of other black students -- in a world where education is the only hope that most ghetto youngsters have for a better life.

Sacrificing these young people's futures, in hopes of gaining some additional black v**es today, is as cynical and fraudulent as it gets.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This Speech Is Dr. Ben Carson Talking About Something He Know's a Lot About, Obamacare...


Ben Carson CPAC: 'Of Course' S***ery And Obamacare Are Not The Same Thing

The Huffington Post / Mar 8, 2014

Conservative activist Dr. Ben Carson didn't back down Saturday on any of his previous controversial remarks, announcing to the Conservative Political Action Conference that he "will continue to defy the PC police" in the media who have twisted his words on same-sex marriage and Obamacare.

Carson had a long list of claims to explain, including the time he said Obamacare was the worst thing since S***ery!

"Of course they said, "Dr. Carson says that s***ery and Obamacare are the same thing,'" he said of the media. "Of course they are not the same thing. S***ery is much worse, but bear in mind what happens with Obamacare. We, the American people, have with that program shifted the power that was given to us by the Constitution and by the founders to the government. It's the most massive shift of power in America that has ever occurred."

He also said that liberals had misconstrued his opposition to same-sex marriage into a claim that it was like bestiality. Dr. Carson said last year that marriage is “a well-established, fundamental pillar of society and no group, be they gays, be they NAMBLA, be they people who believe in bestiality -- it doesn't matter what they are, they don't get to change the definition." He quickly claimed that his comments were taken out of context, and did so again at CPAC.

"You know, because I happen to mention that nobody gets to change the definition of marriage and mention some other categories, they said, 'Dr. Carson said that gay marriage and bestiality are the same thing,'" he said. "Well that's preposterous. Of course they are not the same thing. Anybody who believes that is a dummy, but anybody who believes somebody who says that somebody said that is a dummy. That's the problem, OK?"

"Of course gay people should have the same rights as everyone else, but they don't get extra rights," he continued. "They do not get to redefine marriage."

Carson also took issue with the interpretation of his comments on progressives and N**i Germany. Earlier this year in a speech criticizing progressives, Dr. Carson talked about the need to stand up against people trying to change the country.

"There comes a time when people with values simply have to stand up. Think about N**i Germany," he said in that speech. "Most of those people did not believe in what Hitler was doing. But did they speak up? Did they stand up for what they believe in? They did not, and you saw what happened."

At CPAC, Dr. Carson said the left had wrongly claimed that he said "progressives are N**is and that they are changing America into N**i Germany."

"Of course that is not the case, but that is what they do," he said. "They repeat these lies over and over again because they cannot argue the actual facts."

Hemiman Loc: Communist California

All this while we wait on more r**ts in Fergerson.I wonder what the children think when they see their parents burning and l**ting their own community.

Ricktloml

Unfortunately, if they have been propagandized for decades, they think it is what you do

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

It is sad that these parents do not see that their children are using the parents' actions as training grounds. This is the way they learn to deal with problems, or laws that may be unfair or unjust. Burn some buildings, threaten the w****s, and white people will fold. White people will become afraid and give into each and every demand. And when white children see their parents folding rather than standing firm, they learn to wimp out to become door mats. And all other countries, well they shake their heads and say that our laws are unfair and b****s are mistreated. But, they are not getting the entire story, because our governments muzzles the press. What a circle we have found ourselves.

If I were the end of my blood line, without children and grandchildren, I would find this amusing. But, I worry over our future.

Tasine Loc: Southwest US

Thanks, Don, for this collage of some really great articles by some of the most truly talented and sincere writers in the country. It is too bad that so many minorities of all sorts cannot understand that while America no longer has actual plantations with s***es, those plantations still DO EXIST. Those plantations are in the form of the Democrat Party, major news media, welfare programs, etc. All of us who allow others to define our lives for us are in fact s***es, no matter how tough we talk, no matter what gangs we belong to, no matter where we live in America. Many b****s outside major urban areas are no longer s***es to government, specifically democrat government, but who lead perfectly normal and mainstream lives without being harassed by r****ts. They have jobs, they raise families, many don't use drugs or aren't drunks. Many get through life without ever being arrested.

All it takes to escape victimhood is to refuse to accept victimhood. Choose to not live like a victim. Do not dress as a victim with a chip on your shoulder. Do not assume everyone looks down upon you - unless you wear those baggy drawers with the waistband beneath your butt - that does have a tendency to make people look down on you because you look so ridiculous and silly. Victimhood, just like happiness, is a CHOICE YOU MAKE EVERY DAY.

no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

Don's post was superb and I like your comments to augment it.

Tasine Loc: Southwest US

Thanks, friend.

Don G. Dinsdale Loc: El Cajon, CA (San Diego County)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I appreciate the positive comments about the four articles...

You all seem to get the true picture of what 'they' are doing to themselves and their children as well...

There has been from the time of the first African s***es a real feeling of White superiority over people of color...

B****s, Browns and Yellow people(s) have all been stereotyped as shiftless and lazy and conniving, in print and movies...

Up till WWII Black weren't allowed to serve in the same groups as W****s, I was borning during this time of inlightment (bull-s**t), my early years were in Oakland, CA...

The Neighborhood I lived in was mostly White, the funny thing was the nicest homes with thebest yards and home repairs where owned by B****s...

In the grade school I attended the Black kids dressed better than we W****s, when invited to their homes after school they where nicer than my own home, so I didn't grow up thinking down on B****s, my parents however did use the "N" word when talking about the Black people, and as more B****s moved into our area they decided to sell and move to the Country, they allowed their prejudices to force them to sell and move because the property values would fall because of Black people... So as with the B****s teaching their children how to h**e my parents did the same thing if a little more subtlety... What we reap we sow... Don D.

Tasine Loc: Southwest US

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Seems you and I were raised a lot alike. My parents talked with and treated b****s the exact same way as with other w****s. When my mother was in the hospital for surgery, my dad asked the black family down the road if my sister and I could eat at their home as daddy would be away during the daytime. It was just the natural thing of neighbors helping neighbors, nothing more, nothing less. We all just lived as humans.