336Robin Loc: North Carolina

If you haven't given the subject of f*****m any consideration you might ought to rethink it.

Senator Lindsay Graham and his cohorts in the Senate want to set nationwide policy and not even let the
states make up their own minds.

I'm unsure women are going to like this, but this move may embolden Democrats to maximize their presence
at the polls.



Senate Republicans to introduce nationwide a******n ban

AlterNet - Yesterday 10:35 PM
By David Badash,The New Civil Rights Movement


U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) will lead Senate Republicans in a push to pass a nationwide ban on a******n in a press conference Tuesday, less than two months before the November midterms, according to multiple reports.

Despite wording in an apparent press release calling it a “late-term” a******n ban, The Washington Post’s Caroline Kitchener says it is expected to call for a ban on all a******ns at or after 15 weeks.

“Tomorrow, Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America President Marjorie Dannenfelser, and pro-life women leaders will join Senator Lindsey Graham(R-SC) at a press conference at the U.S. Capitol for the introduction of the Protecting Pain-Capable Unborn Children from Late-Term A******ns Act,” the press release from Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America reads.

Related video: Louisiana Senator Insists State A******n Law Was Written To Ensure ‘No Confusion’


The move to impose a nationwide a******n ban barely into the second trimester comes less than three months after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Roe v. Wade, the nearly 50-year-old landmark decision that said there is a constitutional right to a******n. Justices and Republicans insisted it was a states’ rights issue, but with this push to ban a******n before some women even know they’re pregnant it’s clear the states’ rights claim was a smokescreen.

Politico’s Alice Miranda Ollstein also reported on the expected announcement by Sen. Graham.

The Supreme Court’s decision in the Dobbs case, rescinding the civil right to a******n, and the Democrats’ promise to make the right to a******n a federal law, along with President Biden’s historic legislative successes, have moved projected control of the Senate back to the Democrats.

The South Carolina Post and Courier’s Caitlin Byrd adds, “At a DNC fundraiser earlier tonight in Boston, Biden said: ‘I want to codify Roe v Wade.'”


529
Sponsored Content

WEBCO

The democrats have already tried to codify Roe, and it failed. Seems like even some democrats don't believe in a******n on demand up to birth.

Both sides are wrong...only one side is telling the people what they plan to do, and it's not the regressives.

Smedley_buzkill

You obviously have not given any thought to F*****m, since you have NO IDEA what it is, or what it means. Here is the original explanation of F*****m, given by the original F*****t himself, Benito Mussolini. (You probably don't know who that is,) Actually, it was ghost written by Giovanni Gentile, called "the Father of F*****m." Here is a link, since I'm fairly certain you aren't smart enough or educated enough to find it yourself.
http://www.worldfuturefund.org/wffmaster/reading/germany/mussolini.htm
You know, even though we disagree, for a very reasonable price I would be willing to research this stuff for you and save you any further gratuitous exposition of your ignorance. I'll even explain the big words using words small enough for you to understand.

You see, words, especially those dealing with concepts or ideals, have specific meanings and definitions. I h**e to pee on your cornflakes, (well, okay, actually, I kind of enjoy it) but words don't mean what you say they mean or think they mean, just because you think they should.

Liberty Tree

Why is saving the life of the innocent Facists? Hitler actually practiced selective reproduction to create a superior race. Democrats are the real Facists.

Liberty Tree

He is just a programmed troll to shout Facist when someone pulls his string.

Rose42

Take your own advice. A******n has nothing to do with f*****m no matter how many times you repeat that lie.

Ronald Hatt Loc: Lansing, Mich

Women that accept the practice of a******n, do not Know God! { I fear they don't even care, to know God!}

We all "Know", God does not accept this practice, & condemns it!

Some....think they know 'more" than God! [ Pity them, for they will live hell in eternity! ]

Watch an a******n video...[ if you dare}...How can you call yourself human & "ok" this?

Better go & re-think this human "TOTALLY"...ignorant, & EVIL position....it is unacceptable by decent God-fearing human beings!

"LEAVE THE BABIES ALONE....ALLOW THEM TO BE ADOPTED!"
, , ,

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

And the democrat baby k**lers want to install their a******n on demand laws. The SCOTUS already determined that it was a STATES RIGHTS ISSUE. Pay attention.

TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA

Hey, thanks for the link. I haven’t had time to read the whole thing, but I noticed this paragraph that sure sounds like the current views, and goals of Democrats…


“THE ABSOLUTE PRIMACY OF THE STATE

“The keystone of the F*****t doctrine is its conception of the State, of its essence, its functions, and its aims. For F*****m the State is absolute, individuals and groups relative. Individuals and groups are admissible in so far as they come within the State. Instead of directing the game and guiding the material and moral progress of the community, the liberal State restricts its activities to recording results. The F*****t State is wide awake and has a will of its own. For this reason it can be described as " ethical ".

“At the first quinquennial assembly of the regime, in 1929, I said “The F*****t State is not a night watchman, solicitous only of the personal safety of the citizens; not is it organized exclusively for the purpose of guarantying a certain degree of material prosperity and relatively peaceful conditions of life, a board of directors would do as much. Neither is it exclusively political, divorced from practical realities and holding itself aloof from the multifarious activities of the citizens and the nation. The State, as conceived and realized by F*****m, is a spiritual and ethical entity for securing the political, juridical, and economic organization of the nation, an organization which in its origin and growth is a manifestation of the spirit. The State guarantees the internal and external safety of the country, but it also safeguards and t***smits the spirit of the people, elaborated down the ages in its language, its customs, its faith. The State is not only the present; it is also the past and above all the future. Transcending the individual's brief spell of life, the State stands for the immanent conscience of the nation. The forms in which it finds expression change, but the need for it remains. The State educates the citizens to civism, makes them aware of their mission, urges them to unity; its justice harmonizes their divergent interests; it t***smits to future generations the conquests of the mind in the fields of science, art, law, human solidarity; it leads men up from primitive tribal life to that highest manifestation of human power, imperial rule.
The State hands down to future generations the memory of those who laid down their lives to ensure its safety or to obey its laws; it sets up as examples and records for future ages the names of the captains who enlarged its territory and of the men of genius who have made it famous. Whenever respect for the State declines and the disintegrating and centrifugal tendencies of individuals and groups prevail, nations are headed for decay". Since 1929 economic and political development have everywhere emphasized these t***hs. The importance of the State is rapidly growing. The so-called crisis can only be settled by State action and within the orbit of the State. Where are the shades of the Jules Simons who, in the early days of liberalism proclaimed that the "State should endeavor to render itself useless and prepare to hand in its resignation "? Or of the MacCullochs who, in the second half of last century, urged that the State should desist from governing too much? And what of the English Bentham who considered that all industry asked of government was to be left alone, and of the German Humbolt who expressed the opinion that the best government was a lazy " one? What would they say now to the unceasing, inevitable, and urgently requested interventions of government in business? It is true that the second generation of economists was less uncompromising in this respect than the first, and that even Adam Smith left the door ajar - however cautiously - for government intervention in business.

“If liberalism spells individualism, F*****m spells government…”

336Robin Loc: North Carolina

You can remain in your history book if you like. You can even deny that your party has become card carrying f*****ts but you can't deny progress and remain relevant. V***ses mutate, genes mutate, progress is automatic so the definition of f*****m has a base but that doesn't mean it also doesn't mutate and when it does, it will have striking similarities to the original form.

So research all you want if you want to know the base, but don't ignore that time marches on and everything goes
through changes. What we have now is the latest mutation and they refuse to take the v*****e!

It helps to be v******ted but that is only the beginning.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

T***h be told, this one issue, the Satanic premeditated murder of the most innocent of all humanity secure in the sanctity of a mother's womb, should have triggered a civil war or a revolution. War would be the lesser evil. 64 Million children, plus their progeny, are forever lost. Our American holocaust makes Hitler look like a rank amateur. In fact, to get a better perspective is to comprehend that the sum total of American a******ns since 1973 are equal to the total number of military & civilian deaths, in both the European & Pacific Theaters, during World War II. America, you make Sodom & Gomorrah blush.

martsiva

Helps to be 'v******ted' with an experimental drug?? Helps to do an ILLEGAL mandate that people take this experimental drug?? Did you want to discuss these things??

Radiance3

============================
How DUMB! A******n was never part of the Constitution. And now the SC moved it to the states closer for the people to make their own decisions. A******n was never banned. Just moved to the State. Since the Constitution does not cover it under the Federal law. All these 51 years a******n was never in the Constitution but massively violated by democrats k*****g 63 million babies, particularly the women. Now, it is the greatest issue presented by the LEFT CANDIDATES against the GOP's. GOP did not prevent the a******n. Proper protocol was created to make it legal, and to protect these women.

So, you dumb L*****TS, better discipline your body. If you don't want baby don't sell your body to make money out of it. Behave, and earn. You know how earn it? Something you sweat your arms working to produce something. Or something you use your brain, if you have one to produce something.

Don't be handouts, do something and use you dumb democrat brains!

DamnYANKEE

Your Parents Should've Aborted YOU and the Rest of your ILK , then the rest of us could live in Peace and Quiet

DamnYANKEE

How's bout Late term A******n , he Could just hang his self