nwtk2007 wrote:
Don't have one but had I had one, I would have.
Did you get the gist of my post?
No, not at first. In the beginning, I only read the title. But now I'm reading this followup that you wrote here (and after that I went back and read your Original Post).
It looks like you didn't get the gist of mine either. (There was humor in it.) (But you still wouldn't like it, anyway.)
nwtk2007 wrote:
We believe in our country. It ain't Trump. It ain't any one person. It is our country, something the left should be claiming, but I think they don't like themselves and are probably not able to even see the value of the British loss of their queen and what she represents. They are without sense; without vision or purpose.
Not true. The left does have sense, vision, and purpose; but they're just different from yours.
Now I'm going back and reading your original post, to see what sense, vision, and/or purpose you're presenting.
You mention "illegal v****g". There's not enough of it to be significant. There'd have to be at least hundreds of illegal v**es (and even then they'd probably have to be concentrated in one state to make a difference) to make a difference in the outcome of a p**********l e******n, but there are much fewer than that. A clue is how few the Republicans have been able to identify and prosecute or convict. Another clue is this:
"Rutgers Professor Lorraine Minnite, the nation's top v**e f***d expert, found just six verified cases of v**er impersonation over 12 years of our nation's e******ns. The E******n Law Journal reported that 'the proportion of the population reporting v**er impersonation is indistinguishable from that reporting abduction by extraterrestrials.'"
(Page 28, _How Trump Stole 2020_, by Greg Palast)
She (Lorraine Minnite) is referring to "v**er impersonation" which I suppose might be the main form of illegal v****g.
"E******n f***d" (or trickery by e******n officials) would be a different story. That's where the v**er suppression happens, and it's a significant problem, plenty big enough to change the outcomes of e******ns, and usually this form of wrongdoing favors Republicans.
(Reference: the above-mentioned book by Palast, and other works by him.)
Along with that, there's a lot of gerrymandering and various other trickery going on, usually by Republicans.
A couple of examples of trickery by an e******n official, which might interest you more, was done by a Democrat official in California where I live. It did not affect Republicans directly though. It was in a California primary leading up to a p**********l e******n. The Democrat secretary of state of California left the p**********l primary candidates off of a lot of the b****ts. I got one of those b****ts. I also read about that trick in the same above-mentioned book by Palast. He gives enough information to indicate that it was not just an accident, but rather deliberate and with targeting of groups of v**ers. Another tricky thing in the same state had to do with "crossover" b****ts and local e******n workers being instructed not to tell v**ers about them. (Ibid.)
So there's entertainment for all, but most of it's tricks done by Republican officials in other states.
"woke idiocy": Don't confuse irritants with idiocy. I would say some "woke" stuff is irritating. But usually there's still some sense, behind it, or earlier in the process, before some of the people weren't smart enough about it. (Incidentally, I'm irritated by the very word "woke"; I'm suspicious of the grammar of how it's used in sentences.)
Also in your Original Post you say, "We won't threaten you with violence". I'm not convinced. A lot of MAGA Republicans threatened to hang Mike Pence and were violent on J*** 6, for example.
Finally, I refer back to the beginning of your Original Post where you repeatedly emphasize "No matter what". That's a foolish and dangerous vow. Did you ever think you might be mistaken about something important? It happens, occasionally, to just about everybody, including well-meaning people.
nwtk2007 wrote:
"Us" you ask. It should be all people who would resist ghestapo tactics, threats, under handed acts, propaganda lies, gas lighting, etc.
Trump was (to put it mildly) not sufficiently t***hful to you about C***d (ref.: _Rage_, by Bob Woodward, pp xviii-xix), and also lied to you about the 2020 e******n. So what you're saying here about "propaganda lies" and "gas lighting" is misplaced.