woodguru

Okay, let
s get rid of the obviously stupid response by MAGA Morons...

Not that he didn't lose, the reality is he did.

I think he lost it because his response to C***d was so bad that even many people on the right could see it...it was bad in multiple ways from the start when he tried to pass it off as a cold and sniffles...

and went into it will be gone by the summer

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

And then on to drinking bleach And then onto epizootic pharmacology,
And then he was carried out on a stretcher
In the middle of the night.
And then he got serious.

Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois

Doesn't matter now woodglue. Here's what your side has already started implementing for 2022-24.

Start with one d******e p**********l speech accusing 74 million v**ers of being enemies of the state. Add two Marine guards against a blood-red background for flavor. Whip up both bases. Stir in a large pool of us vs. them mentality and bring to a boil. Sprinkle in a large contingent of FBI operatives to mix with low-intellect radical right-wing and left-wing fanactics. Bake for a few weeks and allow resentment to rise. The FBI will supply the necessary heat and pr********n to foment I**********n 2.0. Frost the cake and have the state-controlled news and social media reacting in horror and disgust at the alleged evil and violent actions of MAGA Republicans.

This is the recipe for a Democrat October Surprise.

The corrupt media are already working overtime to set the stage by playing up the "civil war" potential and predicting violence from "w***e s*********ts and far-right extremists."

The president and Dems in Congress will have no choice but to react decisively to save democracy and protect the American people from this horrible MAGA threat. The critical decision will need to be made: will they have time for more televised show trials before the e******n, or should they just move on to declaring martial law and postponing the e******n indefinitely?

A year ago, I would have thought this scenario impossibly absurd. I also never thought an ex–U.S. president's home could be raided by the FBI, or a current president could make such a h**eful, incendiary, and shall I say "semi-f*****t" speech.

Perhaps they will not need to make that decision at all if the media do their "job" and manufacture enough h**e and resentment toward Republicans. Highly edited video clips and overheated commentator vitriol can be very effective in influencing “the useful i***ts” who want nothing more that want defend Trump or “get him,” all while almost all MAGA Republicans just want to live their lives without all the drama and politics.

A provoked violent reaction by FBI-organized radical left-wing and right-wing dupes could sway the e******n and allow the Dems to continue to control Congress for at least another two years. All they need is a few coordinated attacks at a******n facilities or Dem campaign headquarters. A large group of r****rs calling for civil war would be perfect.

Provocation of violence was the obvious intention behind Biden's insane speech last Thursday night.

Do not fall into their trap. It's a recipe for disaster.

okie don

Maga morons?
I'd put Conservatives up against Liberals anytime!
How smart is it for a Democrat to call everyone not liberal a deplorable?
Pretty damn stupid. IMHO

saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina

wood, I believe that Trump lost the e******n because:
!. Every court he brought suite in threw the case out of court for lack of evidence,
2. Republican state e******n officials said that the e******n was the fairest and most secure in history.
3. Trump tried to bribe or threaten state e******n officials to find him enough v**ed to turn the states that v**ed
Democratic to Republican.
4. Trump tried to get state legislatures to appoint e*******l college members to ignore Biden's victory in their state
and give him the e*******l v**es..
5. Everyone in his P**********l Campaign staff but Bannon, Rudy and Eastman told him he lost.
6. He tried what was in effect a c**p through a s*******s invasion of the Capitol to force Congress to declare him
President.

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

Duh, everything you wrote is after fact. The question put forth is why he lost, not what happened after November 6. As a former teacher, your reading comprehension should be better.

Kevyn

60 % of Americans were bright enough to understand he is a half bright crooked carnival barker

2bltap Loc: Move to the Mainland

Sorry saltwind 78, but you are so wrong on your talking points. None of the so called judges would even LOOK at the evidence or would state that the litigants had no standing which was a major crock of BS, so the rest of your opinion which is yours and yours alone along with the rest of the progressives are actually incorrect. History will prove you and those that espouse your opinions on this matter will be shown that in fact you all are and have been on the wrong side of history. Whatcha going to do then? It's all coming out now as we speak/write here on OPP. There has been so much intentional damage that happened to the United States of America under this Faux administration that it will go down in history as the largest Trojan Horse our country has ever experienced.

BIRDMAN

Yes he’s a horrible person he k**led so many people less than Joe Biden

manning55 Loc: Richmond, Va

========================

For sure he lost because the official count of v**es was against him! Is it possible that he was c***ted? Of course, it is. Have I personally seen any clear evidence that would hold up in court? No. The question is moot.

Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.

Don't know why you don't believe what left wing activists and media titans have already publicly confessed to but here it is again. https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-e******n-campaign/

BIRDMAN

Da da da da

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

That’s funny right there.
There’s no such thing as a conservative.
It’s only an illusive moniker.
That comes out only at e******n time to rally the right.

robertv3

The reason he actually lost the 2020 e******n was probably that he was insensitive to what a great many v**ers cared about. Two of my Republican in-laws were outraged by things Trump did. For one of them it was how children were separated from their parents at our southern border. For the other, it was Trump's behaviors on J*** 6, 2021. This in-law was so Republican that I didn't think she'd ever change, but after J*** 6, 2021 she quit the Republican party, and I was very surprised to hear it (because _I_ had thought she was so "Republican" that she didn't have even that much sense to quit the party, no matter what). Trump _did_ succeed in the _2016_ e******n, even when people could see he was a callous person who didn't care enough about people or didn't respect people enough, _but_ when he kept offending so many times in so many ways, during the following 4 years, eventually enough people got fed up or outraged about some things he did, such that they chose not to v**e for him in 2020.

There's another question one might ask, which is why _should_ such a candidate have lost an e******n, that is, what are the really good reasons why people should v**e against him.

(Separations at border & J*** 6 were both good reasons, also.)

The item you brought up, "his response to C***d was so bad", is one good reason he should have lost. Very early in the p******c, Trump learned about C***d from a visit to China, and soon after that he was interviewed by Bob Woodward, and he told Woodward that C***d is "more deadly than even your strenuous flus". (page xix of _Rage_, by Bob Woodward). This is enough different from what he told the U.S. public that I think he "lied" to the U.S. public about C***d, and that lie did have deadly consequences for thousands of U.S. people, consequences which were foreseeable. I think a good leader would have been more t***hful and less two-faced about such a matter. So in my view this was a good reason why people should v**e him out of office.

Trump said he didn't "want to create a panic". (page xviii, Ibid.). But what good is that -- it's a poor excuse for the situation. Should he assume the U.S. public is so flighty or immature that it should be told a falsehood rather than a t***h about a "deadly" (his word) contagious disease, to keep it from "panicking"? I say no, it's better to tell the U.S. public the t***h about the deadly disease so that the mature and stable people within the U.S. public would be better informed so as to take care of themselves, their families, and so on.

I think Trump was probably more concerned about the stock market than about the health of the people. And his major donors probably felt the same way, and he would have known that. To keep the stock market up, particularly in the short term, one would want to keep the "economy" going along the same way it had been going along, without much interruption. Precautions about C***d would disrupt the normal way of business. So the poor and middle class people got sold down the river (healthwise) so that the wealthy people could continue to maintain big wealth.

JR-57 Loc: South Carolina

And all the while we go on about Trump this and Trump that the Biden administration continues with their intentionally destructive agenda to alter our country into the NWO format.