nwtk2007 wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/judge-dismisses-trump-lawsuit-against-clinton-dnc-officials-involved-in-russia-probe
If that's not a conflict of interest then I don't know what is! The judge should have recused himself and a new judge appointed. Trump has major grounds for appeal.
He was a Democrat so it was ok.
nwtk2007 wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/judge-dismisses-trump-lawsuit-against-clinton-dnc-officials-involved-in-russia-probe
If that's not a conflict of interest then I don't know what is! The judge should have recused himself and a new judge appointed. Trump has major grounds for appeal.
The grounds for Fat Donny's appeal is no where near as strong as the threat of appeal is turning out to be against Judge Aileen Cannon, the wannabe judge who put out the childish ruling on Fat Donny's Special Master request. From the looks of the decision dismissing the claims against Clinton, the judge buried the Fat Donny complaint as being voluminous, disjointed and ill prepared and made complaints that have already been dismissed in previous cases and by the Supreme Court. In other words, it was a typical whimper by the Fat Boy. Poor Little Donny!!
Liberty Tree wrote:
He was a Democrat so it was ok.
There is no conflict. The judge was appointed by Clinton 20 years ago and hasn't spoken to Clinton since. There is no requirement that a person with a right wing bend be entitled to pick their own judge appointed by a right wing loser. You get what you're assigned and you live with it. If you do not like the outcome you can always appeal. In this case and after an analysis of the actual suit by actual competent attorneys, it appears that a disbarment of Fat Donny's attorney for incompetence is a more reasonable outcome than granting an appeal.
Fat Donny is finally feeling the down side animosity that was building in the legal community for years due to his refusal to pay legal bills. Attorneys do not feel that the joy of working with a babbling, uninformed, legally naive lightweight deserves a free ride. Do you work for free? Neither do they.
billlingle wrote:
The grounds for Fat Donny's appeal is no where near as strong as the threat of appeal is turning out to be against Judge Aileen Cannon, the wannabe judge who put out the childish ruling on Fat Donny's Special Master request. From the looks of the decision dismissing the claims against Clinton, the judge buried the Fat Donny complaint as being voluminous, disjointed and ill prepared and made complaints that have already been dismissed in previous cases and by the Supreme Court. In other words, it was a typical whimper by the Fat Boy. Poor Little Donny!!
The grounds for Fat Donny's appeal is no where nea... (
show quote)
It really doesn't matter what he said was the reason. The fact that there is a conflict of interest makes his words as credible as the FBI's are from now on.
nwtk2007 wrote:
It really doesn't matter what he said was the reason. The fact that there is a conflict of interest makes his words as credible as the FBI's are from now on.
A credible conflict of interest must be shown to exist prior to claiming that there is one. This has not been done. With this part missing, the complaint amounts to little more than whining. I can hear that pathetic tone of a Fat Donny whine in my ears right now and just threw up a little bit into my mouth.
Well , if your name is Clinton or Biden , then you are above the law
billlingle wrote:
A credible conflict of interest must be shown to exist prior to claiming that there is one. This has not been done. With this part missing, the complaint amounts to little more than whining. I can hear that pathetic tone of a Fat Donny whine in my ears right now and just threw up a little bit into my mouth.
Appointed by Bill Clinton and the dismissing a case against Bill's wife Hillary is about as credible a conflict as there is.
Bevvy wrote:
Well , if your name is Clinton or Biden , then you are above the law
Right now the name Fat Donny the Loser is managing to avoid being indicted but it does not look good for him. You can be as sure as the sun rises in the east that Clinton, Biden, Obama, Pelosi and any other of the Democrats that enjoy making life difficult for right wingers would be arrested and tried if any of the right wingers could come up with anything to charge them with that had a snowball's chance of even getting a court to agree to hear the case let alone try it. What makes those individuals immune from prosecution is that they don't do anything for which they could be prosecuted. If you are jumping around nearly wetting your pants over that statement then write your favorite right winger and ask why the "offense" that has you incontinent hasn't been prosecuted. Let me know what he says.
Liberty Tree wrote:
He was a Democrat so it was ok.
Here comes the good part, all the barking moon bat libtards on OPP explaining how unbiased it was.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.