My comments are referring to your one statement about U.S. C*****l P****e Officer Brian Sicknick.

“One police officer was k**led by being hit on the head with a fire extinguisher (and dying later, because of that, in a hospital),………”

That is a false statement.

Following are a couple links that debunk that statement. The links are from left leaning partisan sources.

https://www.politifact.com/article/2021/apr/20/update-capitol-police-officer-sicknick-died-natura/

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/brian-sicknick-fire-extinguisher/

I suggest you research the cause of death for the others. Ashli Babbitt was the only person murdered that day, by an incompetent overzealous c*****l p****e officer.

I understand your points.
However.
Without rehashing too much (I hope), you are choosing to believe things that are factually wrong, and then extrapolating 't***hs' based on those choices. The police officer did NOT die 'from a blow to the head', no matter what you choose to believe. As shown by the medical examiners legally binding sworn expert testimony. Stress, even extreme stress, does NOT motivate mentally healthy people to commit suicide. The law, and justice, IS about splitting hairs and looking at facts.....not analyzing patterns or trends. You say you are not interested in strict definitions of how people died, yet you have repeated several times that multiple people died as a result of the r**t, which is factually wrong.
Trump was ELECTED PRECISELY because he had not spent decades "serving" himself in public office. Every one of your "public servants" have made themselves rich on a fixed government salary. Look at Biden. Fifty plus years of "public service", and look at the pathetic job he is doing for America.
Robert, if you want to look for patterns and trends, that is fine, and is absolutely valid.
But no one should be judged, tried, and convicted based on 'trends' or unproven assumptions about what his 'intentions' were. THAT is what you are doing. Reread you post. It is well written, but in it's essence there is not much difference between it and what Rascal writes. Your conclusions are based on assumptions and deeply held beliefs that Trump is a criminal and that everything he does is intended to be selfserving and usually illegal.
Everything you write flows from that basic assumption, and you spend a lot of time and effort rationalizing your beliefs instead of seeking the t***h.
If evidence and objective examination of facts proves that Trump, beyond a reasonable doubt, committed one or more crimes, then I will be first in line to see him held accountable IN FULL! Including jail time.
If you want to look for trends and patterns of inciting violence and r**ts......what Trump has said and done is NOTHING compared to what the Democrats and the left have done and have been doing for decades. If you want to go there, I can list dozens of examples off the top of my head, most of them from Democrat leaders and MUCH worse than 'fight like hell.'

I understand your points.
However.
Without rehashing too much (I hope), you are choosing to believe things that are factually wrong, and then extrapolating 't***hs' based on those choices. The police officer did NOT die 'from a blow to the head', no matter what you choose to believe. As shown by the medical examiners legally binding sworn expert testimony. Stress, even extreme stress, does NOT motivate mentally healthy people to commit suicide. The law, and justice, IS about splitting hairs and looking at facts.....not analyzing patterns or trends. You say you are not interested in strict definitions of how people died, yet you have repeated several times that multiple people died as a result of the r**t, which is factually wrong.
Trump was ELECTED PRECISELY because he had not spent decades "serving" himself in public office. Every one of your "public servants" have made themselves rich on a fixed government salary. Look at Biden. Fifty plus years of "public service", and look at the pathetic job he is doing for America.
Robert, if you want to look for patterns and trends, that is fine, and is absolutely valid.
But no one should be judged, tried, and convicted based on 'trends' or unproven assumptions about what his 'intentions' were. THAT is what you are doing. Reread you post. It is well written, but in it's essence there is not much difference between it and what Rascal writes. Your conclusions are based on assumptions and deeply held beliefs that Trump is a criminal and that everything he does is intended to be selfserving and usually illegal.
Everything you write flows from that basic assumption, and you spend a lot of time and effort rationalizing your beliefs instead of seeking the t***h.
If evidence and objective examination of facts proves that Trump, beyond a reasonable doubt, committed one or more crimes, then I will be first in line to see him held accountable IN FULL! Including jail time.
If you want to look for trends and patterns of inciting violence and r**ts......what Trump has said and done is NOTHING compared to what the Democrats and the left have done and have been doing for decades. If you want to go there, I can list dozens of examples off the top of my head, most of them from Democrat leaders and MUCH worse than 'fight like hell.'

And made himself and his family rich doing it.
When he started in the Senate the pay was less than $43,000/year. When he last served as a Senator it was less than $170,000 per year. Since then he was paid 8 years as VP. took four years off, and has been paid 20 months as president.
Now he is a multi millionaire with a net worth estimated at $9,000,000 and two homes worth close to $5 million. And he did it while living in some of the most expensive cost of living areas in America.
He has been selling SOMETHING! What, oh what could it be??