One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Just as we warned.
Sep 6, 2022 20:31:32   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
https://capitalhillnews.com/mass-shootings-erupt-across-left-wing-communities/

Reply
Sep 6, 2022 20:35:41   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
https://capitalhillnews.com/mass-shootings-erupt-across-left-wing-communities/


We know the race most affected by these policies. It’s like the left preaches tolerance but is secretly r****t.

Reply
Sep 6, 2022 20:36:33   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
https://capitalhillnews.com/mass-shootings-erupt-across-left-wing-communities/


In olden cattle days, it was the culling of the herd.

Reply
 
 
Sep 6, 2022 21:40:33   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
JFlorio wrote:
We know the race most affected by these policies. It’s like the left preaches tolerance but is secretly r****t.


No longer that well kept a secret, though. POC are waking up.

Reply
Sep 6, 2022 22:08:23   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
JFlorio wrote:
We know the race most affected by these policies. It’s like the left preaches tolerance but is secretly r****t.


Their r****m is no secret! LOL!

Reply
Sep 6, 2022 22:09:07   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
AuntiE wrote:
In olden cattle days, it was the culling of the herd.


Like a******n was to be used to thin the black herd.

Reply
Sep 6, 2022 22:14:40   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Like a******n was to be used to thin the black herd.


And, it still is. Look up where the majority of PP clinics are geographically located.

Reply
 
 
Sep 6, 2022 22:27:08   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
AuntiE wrote:
And, it still is. Look up where the majority of PP clinics are geographically located.


I hear ya!

Reply
Sep 7, 2022 05:42:25   #
iFrank Loc: San Antonio
 
AuntiE wrote:
And, it still is. Look up where the majority of PP clinics are geographically located.


Good point. 👍

Reply
Sep 7, 2022 06:05:48   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
JFlorio wrote:
We know the race most affected by these policies. It’s like the left preaches tolerance but is secretly r****t.
Enlightened Liberal: The Detailed R****t History (And Present) Of The Democrat Party
The Democratic Party’s History of R****m
Whitewashing the Democratic Party’s History

Democrats throughout the country show they truly h**e the United States
The Democrat Party is America’s Most Powerful H**e Group
Democrats Really Are the Worst People on the Planet

Biden and Democrats Go Full F*****t – 2021 is ‘The Era of the F**e Crisis’
JOE BIDEN’S F*****T FOLLIES CONTINUE
Joe Biden Is a F*****t by His Own Definition

Too Bad for Slow Joe: The Fallout Continues for Biden Following His Recent “Semi-F*****t” Remark
During a sorry attempt at a recent speech in which Biden made little sense and even fewer good points, our senile commander in chief decided to label those MAGA Republicans that v**ed for Donald Trump a gang of “semi-f*****ts”.

What does “semi-f*****t” mean? Who knows. His press secretary certainly had no idea what he meant and had no good answer when asked about the comment by CNN’s Don Lemon.

But Biden’s sticking to the comment, of course. Some PR person must have told him it was a winner of a remark. But even he, the one who made the remark, might not be able to explain it, as was shown during a recent comment to a reporter, who asked him “What do you mean by semi-f*****m, sir?”

Biden, like his dimwitted press secretary, had no good answer and just said “You know what I mean” in response to the reporter, leaving all of us scratching our heads and wondering if he even knows was he meant by “semi-f*****m.”

Well, as he scratches his head and tries to figure out what his speech meant, much of the GOP is furious about what they see as Biden’s rendition of Hillary’s infamous “basket of deplorables” comment.



Does The Definition Of ‘F*****m’ Apply To The Biden Administration?
By: Ben Carson

Here is a challenge: Define f*****m without reference to a historical event or proper noun.

It’s harder than it seems. Most people associate f*****m with European dictatorships of the 1920s and ’30s. That is with good reason: those were the first f*****t regimes.

The term itself originated in Italy to describe the political philosophy of Benito Mussolini, who borrowed from the Italian word fascio, literally meaning “bundle” (usually of rods or sticks). Mussolini used the term to mean a group of people who are stronger together than individually, such as how a bundle of sticks bound together is much more difficult to snap than any individual stick.

While most f*****t regimes had racial or nationalist elements, it was not r****m or nationalism that defined them; there have been plenty of r****t or nationalist governing structures that do not merit the label “f*****m.” Rather, the necessary ingredient for f*****m is the state’s total domination of all aspects of life, including economic life.

Mussolini defined “f*****m” as “Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State.” Consistent with this, the American Heritage Dictionary includes in its definition of f*****m “a capitalist economy subject to stringent governmental controls.” By hook or by crook, and many times using violence, a f*****t government will brook no dissent and will enlist all of the country’s institutions to further its ends.

During the Trump administration, the left took every opportunity to falsely claim that f*****m was descending upon the land. But anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear knew those claims were outlandish.

There was plenty “outside the State” and “against the State” during the Trump administration (he is still banned on all major social media platforms, for example) and plenty of dissent. There were plenty of institutions that explicitly declared themselves in opposition to the aims of the government.
Nothing Outside of or Against the Regime

Fully cognizant of George Orwell’s quip that “F*****m has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies ‘something not desirable,’” I am becoming concerned that what many claimed to be happening under the Trump administration is becoming reality under the Biden administration.

I do not make that statement lightly. But events over the past several weeks suggest that the Biden administration, in concert with powerful American institutions, is working to ensure that there is nothing outside of or against the official government line.

Last month White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki admitted the administration works closely with Facebook and other social media companies to identify posts it deems objectionable. While Psaki claimed the White House does not “take anything down” or “block anything,” there would be no reason for the White House to point out these statements if not in the hope of social media platforms taking action against posts contrary to the government’s preferred narrative.

Also, more news continues to come out about how the Biden administration is coordinating with private businesses to further its agenda. According to Politico, the White House is “back channeling” with various media organizations about C***D coverage, particularly arguing that the media’s focus on breakthrough infections of people who have already been v******ted undermines the administration’s efforts to get more people v******ted. Relatedly, the New York Times has reported the administration “continues to pressure private companies to introduce c****av***s v*****e mandates to help the U.S. raise its inoculation rates.”
Using Private Businesses to Implement Policy

Regardless of what anyone thinks of the wisdom of the administration’s policies, it should be concerning to all to have the White House directly involved in the operations of private companies. This is especially true when the White House’s focus is on heavily regulated companies, such as broadcast networks. Those are the companies least likely to be able to resist government requests, which always carry the implicit terms of, “Nice business you got there; it would be a shame if anything happened to it.”

It is all the more troubling that the White House is leaning on private companies to do that which the federal government cannot do itself, namely censoring individuals from expressing opinions contrary to the government’s preferred message, and mandating that everyone in America take a certain medicine. This should concern everyone because once you have endorsed the idea that the federal government can and should use private businesses as a tool to implement policy it cannot establish through legal means, there is no limiting principle. Should the government “pressure private companies” to not hire women who have had a******ns? Not hire anyone who supported Trump?

It is not enough to claim the administration is doing this only in response to the C***D emergency. Washington is full of programs that were instituted in response to an “emergency” that has well since passed. This fusion of government goals and private action will just find a new problem to solve. Today it is C***D. Tomorrow it will be c*****e c****e or s******c r****m.

You do not need to take my word for it: in just the past few days the administration announced “goals” for the adoption of electric vehicles in the United States (why it is the federal government’s business to set “goals” for consumer behavior was left unsaid). Standing there right behind the administration were the largest automakers in the country, cheering on the policy so long as there were sufficient government-funded “investments” and “consumer incentives” (read: subsidies). This hand-in-glove cooperation between big government and big business is exactly the kind of “corporatism” that was an essential feature of f*****t states of the past.

Erasing the line between government and private enterprise. Ensuring only government-approved messages are heard. Squashing dissent. Intruding government into every aspect of our lives. The Biden administration’s actions are nothing less than creeping f*****m.

I pray that the administration, and the American people, recognize this and change course before it is too late.
Ben Carson



Article IV, Section 4, US Constitution
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union
a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them
against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature,
or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened),
against Domestic violence.



Can I get an "Amen"?



Reply
Sep 7, 2022 08:29:10   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Enlightened Liberal: The Detailed R****t History (And Present) Of The Democrat Party
The Democratic Party’s History of R****m
Whitewashing the Democratic Party’s History

Democrats throughout the country show they truly h**e the United States
The Democrat Party is America’s Most Powerful H**e Group
Democrats Really Are the Worst People on the Planet

Biden and Democrats Go Full F*****t – 2021 is ‘The Era of the F**e Crisis’
JOE BIDEN’S F*****T FOLLIES CONTINUE
Joe Biden Is a F*****t by His Own Definition

Too Bad for Slow Joe: The Fallout Continues for Biden Following His Recent “Semi-F*****t” Remark
During a sorry attempt at a recent speech in which Biden made little sense and even fewer good points, our senile commander in chief decided to label those MAGA Republicans that v**ed for Donald Trump a gang of “semi-f*****ts”.

What does “semi-f*****t” mean? Who knows. His press secretary certainly had no idea what he meant and had no good answer when asked about the comment by CNN’s Don Lemon.

But Biden’s sticking to the comment, of course. Some PR person must have told him it was a winner of a remark. But even he, the one who made the remark, might not be able to explain it, as was shown during a recent comment to a reporter, who asked him “What do you mean by semi-f*****m, sir?”

Biden, like his dimwitted press secretary, had no good answer and just said “You know what I mean” in response to the reporter, leaving all of us scratching our heads and wondering if he even knows was he meant by “semi-f*****m.”

Well, as he scratches his head and tries to figure out what his speech meant, much of the GOP is furious about what they see as Biden’s rendition of Hillary’s infamous “basket of deplorables” comment.



Does The Definition Of ‘F*****m’ Apply To The Biden Administration?
By: Ben Carson

Here is a challenge: Define f*****m without reference to a historical event or proper noun.

It’s harder than it seems. Most people associate f*****m with European dictatorships of the 1920s and ’30s. That is with good reason: those were the first f*****t regimes.

The term itself originated in Italy to describe the political philosophy of Benito Mussolini, who borrowed from the Italian word fascio, literally meaning “bundle” (usually of rods or sticks). Mussolini used the term to mean a group of people who are stronger together than individually, such as how a bundle of sticks bound together is much more difficult to snap than any individual stick.

While most f*****t regimes had racial or nationalist elements, it was not r****m or nationalism that defined them; there have been plenty of r****t or nationalist governing structures that do not merit the label “f*****m.” Rather, the necessary ingredient for f*****m is the state’s total domination of all aspects of life, including economic life.

Mussolini defined “f*****m” as “Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State.” Consistent with this, the American Heritage Dictionary includes in its definition of f*****m “a capitalist economy subject to stringent governmental controls.” By hook or by crook, and many times using violence, a f*****t government will brook no dissent and will enlist all of the country’s institutions to further its ends.

During the Trump administration, the left took every opportunity to falsely claim that f*****m was descending upon the land. But anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear knew those claims were outlandish.

There was plenty “outside the State” and “against the State” during the Trump administration (he is still banned on all major social media platforms, for example) and plenty of dissent. There were plenty of institutions that explicitly declared themselves in opposition to the aims of the government.
Nothing Outside of or Against the Regime

Fully cognizant of George Orwell’s quip that “F*****m has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies ‘something not desirable,’” I am becoming concerned that what many claimed to be happening under the Trump administration is becoming reality under the Biden administration.

I do not make that statement lightly. But events over the past several weeks suggest that the Biden administration, in concert with powerful American institutions, is working to ensure that there is nothing outside of or against the official government line.

Last month White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki admitted the administration works closely with Facebook and other social media companies to identify posts it deems objectionable. While Psaki claimed the White House does not “take anything down” or “block anything,” there would be no reason for the White House to point out these statements if not in the hope of social media platforms taking action against posts contrary to the government’s preferred narrative.

Also, more news continues to come out about how the Biden administration is coordinating with private businesses to further its agenda. According to Politico, the White House is “back channeling” with various media organizations about C***D coverage, particularly arguing that the media’s focus on breakthrough infections of people who have already been v******ted undermines the administration’s efforts to get more people v******ted. Relatedly, the New York Times has reported the administration “continues to pressure private companies to introduce c****av***s v*****e mandates to help the U.S. raise its inoculation rates.”
Using Private Businesses to Implement Policy

Regardless of what anyone thinks of the wisdom of the administration’s policies, it should be concerning to all to have the White House directly involved in the operations of private companies. This is especially true when the White House’s focus is on heavily regulated companies, such as broadcast networks. Those are the companies least likely to be able to resist government requests, which always carry the implicit terms of, “Nice business you got there; it would be a shame if anything happened to it.”

It is all the more troubling that the White House is leaning on private companies to do that which the federal government cannot do itself, namely censoring individuals from expressing opinions contrary to the government’s preferred message, and mandating that everyone in America take a certain medicine. This should concern everyone because once you have endorsed the idea that the federal government can and should use private businesses as a tool to implement policy it cannot establish through legal means, there is no limiting principle. Should the government “pressure private companies” to not hire women who have had a******ns? Not hire anyone who supported Trump?

It is not enough to claim the administration is doing this only in response to the C***D emergency. Washington is full of programs that were instituted in response to an “emergency” that has well since passed. This fusion of government goals and private action will just find a new problem to solve. Today it is C***D. Tomorrow it will be c*****e c****e or s******c r****m.

You do not need to take my word for it: in just the past few days the administration announced “goals” for the adoption of electric vehicles in the United States (why it is the federal government’s business to set “goals” for consumer behavior was left unsaid). Standing there right behind the administration were the largest automakers in the country, cheering on the policy so long as there were sufficient government-funded “investments” and “consumer incentives” (read: subsidies). This hand-in-glove cooperation between big government and big business is exactly the kind of “corporatism” that was an essential feature of f*****t states of the past.

Erasing the line between government and private enterprise. Ensuring only government-approved messages are heard. Squashing dissent. Intruding government into every aspect of our lives. The Biden administration’s actions are nothing less than creeping f*****m.

I pray that the administration, and the American people, recognize this and change course before it is too late.
Ben Carson



Article IV, Section 4, US Constitution
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union
a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them
against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature,
or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened),
against Domestic violence.



Can I get an "Amen"?
url=http://enlightenedliberal.com/the-detailed-r*... (show quote)


AMEN! Once again you provide relevant and factual articles from a great intellect. Thank you.

Reply
 
 
Sep 7, 2022 08:32:51   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Excellent information.
Blade_Runner wrote:
Enlightened Liberal: The Detailed R****t History (And Present) Of The Democrat Party
The Democratic Party’s History of R****m
Whitewashing the Democratic Party’s History

Democrats throughout the country show they truly h**e the United States
The Democrat Party is America’s Most Powerful H**e Group
Democrats Really Are the Worst People on the Planet

Biden and Democrats Go Full F*****t – 2021 is ‘The Era of the F**e Crisis’
JOE BIDEN’S F*****T FOLLIES CONTINUE
Joe Biden Is a F*****t by His Own Definition

Too Bad for Slow Joe: The Fallout Continues for Biden Following His Recent “Semi-F*****t” Remark
During a sorry attempt at a recent speech in which Biden made little sense and even fewer good points, our senile commander in chief decided to label those MAGA Republicans that v**ed for Donald Trump a gang of “semi-f*****ts”.

What does “semi-f*****t” mean? Who knows. His press secretary certainly had no idea what he meant and had no good answer when asked about the comment by CNN’s Don Lemon.

But Biden’s sticking to the comment, of course. Some PR person must have told him it was a winner of a remark. But even he, the one who made the remark, might not be able to explain it, as was shown during a recent comment to a reporter, who asked him “What do you mean by semi-f*****m, sir?”

Biden, like his dimwitted press secretary, had no good answer and just said “You know what I mean” in response to the reporter, leaving all of us scratching our heads and wondering if he even knows was he meant by “semi-f*****m.”

Well, as he scratches his head and tries to figure out what his speech meant, much of the GOP is furious about what they see as Biden’s rendition of Hillary’s infamous “basket of deplorables” comment.



Does The Definition Of ‘F*****m’ Apply To The Biden Administration?
By: Ben Carson

Here is a challenge: Define f*****m without reference to a historical event or proper noun.

It’s harder than it seems. Most people associate f*****m with European dictatorships of the 1920s and ’30s. That is with good reason: those were the first f*****t regimes.

The term itself originated in Italy to describe the political philosophy of Benito Mussolini, who borrowed from the Italian word fascio, literally meaning “bundle” (usually of rods or sticks). Mussolini used the term to mean a group of people who are stronger together than individually, such as how a bundle of sticks bound together is much more difficult to snap than any individual stick.

While most f*****t regimes had racial or nationalist elements, it was not r****m or nationalism that defined them; there have been plenty of r****t or nationalist governing structures that do not merit the label “f*****m.” Rather, the necessary ingredient for f*****m is the state’s total domination of all aspects of life, including economic life.

Mussolini defined “f*****m” as “Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State.” Consistent with this, the American Heritage Dictionary includes in its definition of f*****m “a capitalist economy subject to stringent governmental controls.” By hook or by crook, and many times using violence, a f*****t government will brook no dissent and will enlist all of the country’s institutions to further its ends.

During the Trump administration, the left took every opportunity to falsely claim that f*****m was descending upon the land. But anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear knew those claims were outlandish.

There was plenty “outside the State” and “against the State” during the Trump administration (he is still banned on all major social media platforms, for example) and plenty of dissent. There were plenty of institutions that explicitly declared themselves in opposition to the aims of the government.
Nothing Outside of or Against the Regime

Fully cognizant of George Orwell’s quip that “F*****m has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies ‘something not desirable,’” I am becoming concerned that what many claimed to be happening under the Trump administration is becoming reality under the Biden administration.

I do not make that statement lightly. But events over the past several weeks suggest that the Biden administration, in concert with powerful American institutions, is working to ensure that there is nothing outside of or against the official government line.

Last month White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki admitted the administration works closely with Facebook and other social media companies to identify posts it deems objectionable. While Psaki claimed the White House does not “take anything down” or “block anything,” there would be no reason for the White House to point out these statements if not in the hope of social media platforms taking action against posts contrary to the government’s preferred narrative.

Also, more news continues to come out about how the Biden administration is coordinating with private businesses to further its agenda. According to Politico, the White House is “back channeling” with various media organizations about C***D coverage, particularly arguing that the media’s focus on breakthrough infections of people who have already been v******ted undermines the administration’s efforts to get more people v******ted. Relatedly, the New York Times has reported the administration “continues to pressure private companies to introduce c****av***s v*****e mandates to help the U.S. raise its inoculation rates.”
Using Private Businesses to Implement Policy

Regardless of what anyone thinks of the wisdom of the administration’s policies, it should be concerning to all to have the White House directly involved in the operations of private companies. This is especially true when the White House’s focus is on heavily regulated companies, such as broadcast networks. Those are the companies least likely to be able to resist government requests, which always carry the implicit terms of, “Nice business you got there; it would be a shame if anything happened to it.”

It is all the more troubling that the White House is leaning on private companies to do that which the federal government cannot do itself, namely censoring individuals from expressing opinions contrary to the government’s preferred message, and mandating that everyone in America take a certain medicine. This should concern everyone because once you have endorsed the idea that the federal government can and should use private businesses as a tool to implement policy it cannot establish through legal means, there is no limiting principle. Should the government “pressure private companies” to not hire women who have had a******ns? Not hire anyone who supported Trump?

It is not enough to claim the administration is doing this only in response to the C***D emergency. Washington is full of programs that were instituted in response to an “emergency” that has well since passed. This fusion of government goals and private action will just find a new problem to solve. Today it is C***D. Tomorrow it will be c*****e c****e or s******c r****m.

You do not need to take my word for it: in just the past few days the administration announced “goals” for the adoption of electric vehicles in the United States (why it is the federal government’s business to set “goals” for consumer behavior was left unsaid). Standing there right behind the administration were the largest automakers in the country, cheering on the policy so long as there were sufficient government-funded “investments” and “consumer incentives” (read: subsidies). This hand-in-glove cooperation between big government and big business is exactly the kind of “corporatism” that was an essential feature of f*****t states of the past.

Erasing the line between government and private enterprise. Ensuring only government-approved messages are heard. Squashing dissent. Intruding government into every aspect of our lives. The Biden administration’s actions are nothing less than creeping f*****m.

I pray that the administration, and the American people, recognize this and change course before it is too late.
Ben Carson



Article IV, Section 4, US Constitution
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union
a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them
against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature,
or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened),
against Domestic violence.



Can I get an "Amen"?
url=http://enlightenedliberal.com/the-detailed-r*... (show quote)

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.