One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Jonathan Turley Blasts the Most 'Glaring Element' of Biden's Unhinged Attack Against Trump and MAGA
Page 1 of 12 next> last>>
Sep 3, 2022 09:30:28   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
https://redstate.com/mike_miller/2022/09/02/jonathan-turley-blasts-the-most-glaring-element-of-bidens-unhinged-attack-against-trump-and-maga-n621672?

Jonathan Turley Blasts the Most 'Glaring Element' of Biden's Unhinged Attack Against Trump and MAGA
Mike MillerSep 02, 2022 6:30 PM ET

And there it was. The most d******e political speech by a sitting president in at least modern history. Joe Biden, arms waving and fists clenched, standing in front of a creepy red background, replete with two United States Marines in dress uniform “standing guard,” as their commander in chief blasted “semi-f*****t” Donald Trump and the MAGA crowd as the top threat to America’s democracy.

Among the sea of political pundits continuing on Friday to beat to death Biden’s incendiary speech from every conceivable angle — and then some — Georgetown University Law professor and frequent Fox News guest, Jonathan Turley opted for less hyperbole and more substantive, specific criticism of Biden’s militaristic Thursday night speech — and he needed just four tweets to do it.

The optics of Biden’s speech instantly became a source of Internet chatter with the weird red background that made the President look like he was giving a stump speech from Dante’s Inferno. However, it was the use of the Marine guards that were the most glaring element…

Dante’s Inferno. Nicely played — I hadn’t thought of that comparison.

Turley not only focused on what he called the most “glaring element” of Biden’s d******e diatribe; he also pointed to specific language in a Department of Defense Directive that prohibits active members of the Armed Forces from engaging in partisan political activities.

Under Department of Defense Directive 1344.10 (“Political Activities for Members of the Armed Forces”) members of the Armed Forces may not engage in political activities…

Um, Joe?

The DoD’s Directive 1344.10 states, in part:

In keeping with the traditional concept that members on active duty should not engage in partisan political activity, and that members not on active duty should avoid inferences that their political activities imply or appear to imply official aponsorship, approval, or endorsement, the following policy shall apply:

[…]

4.1.2. A member of the Armed Forces on active duty shall not:


Let’s go to Turley for a few of the “shall nots.”

The long list of prohibited acts include: “Attend partisan political events as an official representative of the Armed Forces, except as a member of a joint Armed Forces color guard at the opening ceremonies of the national conventions of the Republican, Democratic, or other political parties recognized by the Federal E******ns Committee or as otherwise authorized by the Secretary concerned.”

Hmm. I missed the part where it says: “as otherwise authorized by the president.”

Symbolism over substance has long been a staple of the Democrat Party. Who can forget Nancy Pelosi, Chucky Schumer, and other Congressional Democrats ridiculously kneeling in honor of G****e F***d, with African Kente cloth patronizingly draped around their necks?

And who can forget Barack Obama after the Sandy Hook Elementary School mass shooting — which left 26 victims dead; 20 of them children, ages 6-7 — surrounded by children for a photo-op as he signed 23 executive orders on “gun violence”?

But using United States Marines as a backdrop for the most d******e political speech by an American president in modern history? A president whose White House recently announced a unity summit, of all things? Laughable, hypocritical, inexcusable, d********g, — take your pick.

Uniformed White House guards is one thing. Trotting out U.S. Marines as props behind a hypocritical partisan-hack president delivering an angry partisan-hack speech in which he called half of America “semi-f*****ts” is another. It is unacceptable, and it is d********g — but par for Biden’s course.

Incidentally, as reported by my colleague Nick Arama on Friday, Biden appears to be uncharacteristically attempting to backtrack by doing a double-backflip on his incendiary speech.

Right, Joe. Say it ain’t so. Nonsense, “Jack” — you said what you said. Own it.

Cue the White House crickets.

Reply
Sep 3, 2022 09:41:36   #
EmilyD
 
AuntiE wrote:
https://redstate.com/mike_miller/2022/09/02/jonathan-turley-blasts-the-most-glaring-element-of-bidens-unhinged-attack-against-trump-and-maga-n621672?

Jonathan Turley Blasts the Most 'Glaring Element' of Biden's Unhinged Attack Against Trump and MAGA
Mike MillerSep 02, 2022 6:30 PM ET

And there it was. The most d******e political speech by a sitting president in at least modern history. Joe Biden, arms waving and fists clenched, standing in front of a creepy red background, replete with two United States Marines in dress uniform “standing guard,” as their commander in chief blasted “semi-f*****t” Donald Trump and the MAGA crowd as the top threat to America’s democracy.

Among the sea of political pundits continuing on Friday to beat to death Biden’s incendiary speech from every conceivable angle — and then some — Georgetown University Law professor and frequent Fox News guest, Jonathan Turley opted for less hyperbole and more substantive, specific criticism of Biden’s militaristic Thursday night speech — and he needed just four tweets to do it.

The optics of Biden’s speech instantly became a source of Internet chatter with the weird red background that made the President look like he was giving a stump speech from Dante’s Inferno. However, it was the use of the Marine guards that were the most glaring element…

Dante’s Inferno. Nicely played — I hadn’t thought of that comparison.

Turley not only focused on what he called the most “glaring element” of Biden’s d******e diatribe; he also pointed to specific language in a Department of Defense Directive that prohibits active members of the Armed Forces from engaging in partisan political activities.

Under Department of Defense Directive 1344.10 (“Political Activities for Members of the Armed Forces”) members of the Armed Forces may not engage in political activities…

Um, Joe?

The DoD’s Directive 1344.10 states, in part:

In keeping with the traditional concept that members on active duty should not engage in partisan political activity, and that members not on active duty should avoid inferences that their political activities imply or appear to imply official aponsorship, approval, or endorsement, the following policy shall apply:

[…]

4.1.2. A member of the Armed Forces on active duty shall not:


Let’s go to Turley for a few of the “shall nots.”

The long list of prohibited acts include: “Attend partisan political events as an official representative of the Armed Forces, except as a member of a joint Armed Forces color guard at the opening ceremonies of the national conventions of the Republican, Democratic, or other political parties recognized by the Federal E******ns Committee or as otherwise authorized by the Secretary concerned.”

Hmm. I missed the part where it says: “as otherwise authorized by the president.”

Symbolism over substance has long been a staple of the Democrat Party. Who can forget Nancy Pelosi, Chucky Schumer, and other Congressional Democrats ridiculously kneeling in honor of G****e F***d, with African Kente cloth patronizingly draped around their necks?

And who can forget Barack Obama after the Sandy Hook Elementary School mass shooting — which left 26 victims dead; 20 of them children, ages 6-7 — surrounded by children for a photo-op as he signed 23 executive orders on “gun violence”?

But using United States Marines as a backdrop for the most d******e political speech by an American president in modern history? A president whose White House recently announced a unity summit, of all things? Laughable, hypocritical, inexcusable, d********g, — take your pick.

Uniformed White House guards is one thing. Trotting out U.S. Marines as props behind a hypocritical partisan-hack president delivering an angry partisan-hack speech in which he called half of America “semi-f*****ts” is another. It is unacceptable, and it is d********g — but par for Biden’s course.

Incidentally, as reported by my colleague Nick Arama on Friday, Biden appears to be uncharacteristically attempting to backtrack by doing a double-backflip on his incendiary speech.

Right, Joe. Say it ain’t so. Nonsense, “Jack” — you said what you said. Own it.

Cue the White House crickets.
https://redstate.com/mike_miller/2022/09/02/jonath... (show quote)


Even the White House crickets are cringing.

The "deplorables" label for Trump's supporters by Hillary crashed and burned like the Hindenburg....does Biden think it will work when he calls us f*****ts? Does he really think we are going to go back home and forget about it?

Republicans know that if they've ever not v**ed in their lifetimes, this is NOT THE TIME for that. Get up off your fannies and go out and V**E.

Don't say it doesn't matter - it does!!!!!!

Reply
Sep 3, 2022 10:01:02   #
currahee506
 
The puppet spokesman for the NWO international criminal cabal officially declared war on American citizens.

Reply
 
 
Sep 3, 2022 10:11:32   #
EmilyD
 
currahee506 wrote:
The puppet spokesman for the NWO international criminal cabal officially declared war on American citizens.


Just like Hillary did when she called Trump's supporters a 'basket of deplorables'! Doesn't he remember what happened to her?????

Reply
Sep 3, 2022 10:51:48   #
pegw
 
Biden's speach in front of Independence Hall in Philadelphia was long over due. Trump and his MAGA horde ate a clear danger to our democracy. I sugest you search YouTube to listen to the whole story

Reply
Sep 3, 2022 11:21:05   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
pegw wrote:
Biden's speach in front of Independence Hall in Philadelphia was long over due. Trump and his MAGA horde ate a clear danger to our democracy. I sugest you search YouTube to listen to the whole story


In exactly what way are they a ”danger to our” Constitutional Republic?

Reply
Sep 3, 2022 11:31:32   #
kemmer
 
AuntiE wrote:
The most d******e political speech by a sitting president in at least modern history.

Apart from every speech Trump ever made, of course.

Reply
 
 
Sep 3, 2022 11:42:14   #
EmilyD
 
kemmer wrote:
Apart from every speech Trump ever made, of course.

And I'm sure you watched them so you could make that objective observation......

Reply
Sep 3, 2022 11:42:59   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
pegw wrote:
Biden's speach in front of Independence Hall in Philadelphia was long over due. Trump and his MAGA horde ate a clear danger to our democracy. I sugest you search YouTube to listen to the whole story


As usual, you have no idea what you are talking about. By the way, when did Trump and his MAGA horde eat that clear danger to democracy?

Reply
Sep 3, 2022 11:49:59   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
pegw wrote:
Biden's speach in front of Independence Hall in Philadelphia was long over due. Trump and his MAGA horde ate a clear danger to our democracy. I sugest you search YouTube to listen to the whole story


How are Republicans a threat to this "republic", please be specific?

Reply
Sep 3, 2022 11:51:08   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
microphor wrote:
How are Republicans a threat to this "republic", please be specific?


I would wager no answer will be forthcoming!

Reply
 
 
Sep 3, 2022 11:53:07   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
kemmer wrote:
Apart from every speech Trump ever made, of course.


Hmmm…so a highly respected law professor at George Washington University is incorrect? You do realize he is a prominent Democrat, correct? Rhetorical question.

Reply
Sep 3, 2022 11:54:23   #
F.D.R.
 
pegw wrote:
Biden's speach in front of Independence Hall in Philadelphia was long over due. Trump and his MAGA horde ate a clear danger to our democracy. I sugest you search YouTube to listen to the whole story


C'mon Peg, if you really believe that drivel then YOU are the danger to democracy.

Reply
Sep 3, 2022 11:57:30   #
EmilyD
 
AuntiE wrote:
I would wager no answer will be forthcoming!

Hit and run....as usual.

Reply
Sep 3, 2022 12:01:10   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
EmilyD wrote:
Hit and run....as usual.


She may be searching CNN and MSNBC for the answers; however, will be unable to coherently present an answer.

Reply
Page 1 of 12 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.