One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Infringe the 1st Amendment and dispel the Muslims
Nov 3, 2014 21:23:48   #
rumitoid
 
You guys are too funny. Love the Constitution? "Let me keep my weapon without any reasonable controls but let me judge this or that group as un-entitled to liberty." Sick!

Reply
Nov 3, 2014 21:29:16   #
W8_4_It
 
rumitoid wrote:
You guys are too funny. Love the Constitution? "Let me keep my weapon without any reasonable controls but let me judge this or that group as un-entitled to liberty." Sick!



Thank you for your concern, infidel.

Silence or I keel you!
Silence or I keel you!...

Reply
Nov 3, 2014 21:31:43   #
son of witless
 
W8_4_It wrote:
Thank you for your concern, infidel.


:lol:

Reply
 
 
Nov 3, 2014 21:41:00   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
Are you paid by the topics you create? If not, what is the difference between this thread and your other one on First Amendment and Muslims?


rumitoid wrote:
You guys are too funny. Love the Constitution? "Let me keep my weapon without any reasonable controls but let me judge this or that group as un-entitled to liberty." Sick!

Reply
Nov 3, 2014 23:36:30   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
ginnyt wrote:
Are you paid by the topics you create? If not, what is the difference between this thread and your other one on First Amendment and Muslims?


He changed into a new pair of pajamas.....

Reply
Nov 3, 2014 23:43:51   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
I think he gets paid by the amount of traffic and number of posts.

America Only wrote:
He changed into a new pair of pajamas.....


:thumbup: :thumbup: :!: :!:

Reply
Nov 4, 2014 00:04:32   #
W8_4_It
 
ginnyt wrote:
Are you paid by the topics you create? If not, what is the difference between this thread and your other one on First Amendment and Muslims?


That one doesn't feature me, Achmed.

You seem like a nice person, Please buy my new book.

Hi, I'm Achmed
Hi, I'm Achmed...

Please buy my new book
Please buy my new book...

Reply
 
 
Nov 4, 2014 07:16:47   #
cant beleve Loc: Planet Kolob
 
W8_4_It wrote:
That one doesn't feature me, Achmed.

You seem like a nice person, Please buy my new book.


Too funny! :thumbup: :XD: 😂😁😇

Reply
Nov 4, 2014 17:29:29   #
rumitoid
 
ginnyt wrote:
Are you paid by the topics you create? If not, what is the difference between this thread and your other one on First Amendment and Muslims?


Huh?

Reply
Nov 4, 2014 17:39:39   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
rumitoid wrote:
Huh?


You already have an active post....but, being that you were hitting the bottle hard last night you may have forgotten the original post you created.


BTW, coming to a Mosque near you in the grand old state of NM.....





Reply
Nov 4, 2014 18:02:07   #
rumitoid
 
ginnyt wrote:
You already have an active post....but, being that you were hitting the bottle hard last night you may have forgotten the original post you created.


BTW, coming to a Mosque near you in the grand old state of NM.....


Have you an answer as to what America can do to get around the 1st Amendment--just this once, mind--and deal with the "Muslim problem"?

Reply
 
 
Nov 4, 2014 18:28:20   #
hprinze Loc: Central Florida
 
rumitoid wrote:
You guys are too funny. Love the Constitution? "Let me keep my weapon without any reasonable controls but let me judge this or that group as un-entitled to liberty." Sick!


=====================================

The infringement on the 1st amendment is a group calling itself a rekigion and seeking freedom to rape, murder, and terrorize in the name of religion, all who do not yield to them.

If there were a few congress critters who had some cohones, they would define relition and make the definition binding on those seeking freedom of "religion".

Reply
Nov 4, 2014 18:46:34   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
This is a two part response. Part 1, for noncitizens, they are not guaranteed protection of religion under our Constitution. In 1990, the Supreme Court said cases establishing constitutional protections extended to aliens “are constitutional decisions of this Court expressly according differing protection to aliens than to citizens, based on our conclusion that the particular provisions in question were not intended to extend to aliens in the same degree as to citizens” (United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259).

Now for part 2. For citizens, if the government can prove that there is an issue of security or common good, then portions of a religion can be restricted. Such as beheading anyone that does not convert can be prosecuted as murder. Although an attempt to limit government involvement has a long history, even the most recent Religious Freedom Restoration Act still uphold the right of the citizens of the US freedom from religion as well as freedom of religion. Therefore, a muslims' need to dispatch infidels as part of their religion will not be tolerated in the US.

Solution, enforce the laws on the books.

And in the meantime encourage Muslims to return to their own garden spots they created in their own country by providing them with lots of pork in food banks. Establish pig farms near Mosques. Use the Quran for wallpaper in public restrooms..... I do not encourage anyone to lay one finger on a Muslim, but do make them uncomfortable enough to want to pack up and leave!

rumitoid wrote:
Have you an answer as to what America can do to get around the 1st Amendment--just this once, mind--and deal with the "Muslim problem"?

Reply
Nov 4, 2014 23:01:06   #
dafongi Loc: the Green mountain state
 
ginnyt wrote:
This is a two part response. Part 1, for noncitizens, they are not guaranteed protection of religion under our Constitution. In 1990, the Supreme Court said cases establishing constitutional protections extended to aliens “are constitutional decisions of this Court expressly according differing protection to aliens than to citizens, based on our conclusion that the particular provisions in question were not intended to extend to aliens in the same degree as to citizens” (United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259).

Now for part 2. For citizens, if the government can prove that there is an issue of security or common good, then portions of a religion can be restricted. Such as beheading anyone that does not convert can be prosecuted as murder. Although an attempt to limit government involvement has a long history, even the most recent Religious Freedom Restoration Act still uphold the right of the citizens of the US freedom from religion as well as freedom of religion. Therefore, a muslims' need to dispatch infidels as part of their religion will not be tolerated in the US.

Solution, enforce the laws on the books.

And in the meantime encourage Muslims to return to their own garden spots they created in their own country by providing them with lots of pork in food banks. Establish pig farms near Mosques. Use the Quran for wallpaper in public restrooms..... I do not encourage anyone to lay one finger on a Muslim, but do make them uncomfortable enough to want to pack up and leave!
This is a two part response. Part 1, for noncitiz... (show quote)


Right on GinnyT - - - - - - enforce the laws on the books.

Reply
Nov 5, 2014 18:24:21   #
cant beleve Loc: Planet Kolob
 
dafongi wrote:
Right on GinnyT - - - - - - enforce the laws on the books.


Spot on,they have no rights that protect them.see to it that doesn't change. They are very persistent in ruining freedom. The devil never gives up,and they are the devils play things. Unfortunate but true.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.