One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Another e******n recount, same result: It was fair and accurate
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Aug 23, 2022 07:40:51   #
Big Kahuna
 
slatten49 wrote:
One can always count on a snide remark from you.

IMO, the issue here: Again, the integrity of the v**e was confirmed.


Do you agree with the outcome of the pro-infanticide v**e Slats? A yes or no will do. We don't need one of your long rants.

Reply
Aug 23, 2022 07:42:54   #
Big Kahuna
 
Parky60 wrote:
So does this that you support a******n slatten? A simple yes or no will do.


Will slats answer us??

Reply
Aug 23, 2022 07:48:13   #
Big Kahuna
 
Sonny Magoo wrote:
I've read a couple articles.
It's something how they all mention Trump as the beginnings of e******n integrity doubt.
They're all so freaking stoned they forget all about how Trump sole the 2016 from Hillary and was the ill********e p*******t.
Take hike bolshy.


Actually, it was Hitlery that had thought she had the win in the bag by her previously set up ways to c***t and steal the e******n from Trump. Why do you think she didn't go to the swing states to campaign? She thought she had those states in the bag but found out too late that T***p w*n so convincingly in those states that her c***t and extra illegal v**es still couldn't pull it out. Why do you think her mouth was aghast and she almost dropped to the floor when she lost to Trump??? Then the sore loser started the Russian Collusion h**x and made America suffer with her lies.

Reply
 
 
Aug 23, 2022 07:52:39   #
Big Kahuna
 
slatten49 wrote:
Simply offering more proof of the integrity in our nation's e******n processes.


Slats, you are clueless like 50% of Americans about e******n integrity. 1st of all l*****ts have 0% integrity so e******ns run by demorats are basically fraudulent and unethical. If you had any ethics you wouldn't be a demorat/c****ecrat.

Reply
Aug 23, 2022 09:18:50   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
Big Kahuna wrote:
Will slats answer us??

I was taught to interpret silence as meaning consent. Need I say more?

Reply
Aug 23, 2022 10:24:39   #
Liberty Tree
 
Big Kahuna wrote:
Will slats answer us??


He never voices his own thoughts. He is limited to posting from outside source.

Reply
Aug 23, 2022 10:57:48   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
dtucker300 wrote:
A recount is a recount is a recount. Computer recounts are GIGO (garbage in, garbage out)



I'm in no way up to speed on the details however, have to ask.
Georgia during the recount, counted the same late post marked b****ts the second time, the same b****ts with no date next to the signature and the same b****ts that signatures had not been verified....the same v****g machine irregularities.
Michigan recounted the same v**es that outnumbered v**ers...

Reply
 
 
Aug 23, 2022 11:48:50   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
I'm in no way up to speed on the details however, have to ask.
Georgia during the recount, counted the same late post marked b****ts the second time, the same b****ts with no date next to the signature and the same b****ts that signatures had not been verified....the same v****g machine irregularities.
Michigan recounted the same v**es that outnumbered v**ers...



Reply
Aug 23, 2022 12:48:04   #
moldyoldy
 
Big Kahuna wrote:
Actually, it was Hitlery that had thought she had the win in the bag by her previously set up ways to c***t and steal the e******n from Trump. Why do you think she didn't go to the swing states to campaign? She thought she had those states in the bag but found out too late that T***p w*n so convincingly in those states that her c***t and extra illegal v**es still couldn't pull it out. Why do you think her mouth was aghast and she almost dropped to the floor when she lost to Trump??? Then the sore loser started the Russian Collusion h**x and made America suffer with her lies.
Actually, it was Hitlery that had thought she had ... (show quote)




It seems that Barr could be in big trouble for lying about the results of the mueller investigation.

Reply
Aug 23, 2022 13:37:17   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
I'm in no way up to speed on the details however, have to ask.
Georgia during the recount, counted the same late post marked b****ts the second time, the same b****ts with no date next to the signature and the same b****ts that signatures had not been verified....the same v****g machine irregularities.
Michigan recounted the same v**es that outnumbered v**ers...


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-e******n-recount-explainer-idUSKBN27Q38K

As offered earlier, the Kansas recount results provided additional proof that our nation's e******ns are fair and accurate, regardless of the issue(s) or names on the b****t(s).

As for Michigan in 2020...

https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/e******ns/2020/11/04/michigan-e******n-b****ts-mail-absentee-hour-count-update/6161367002/?fbclid=IwAR0NM4hlF1b3gNr02AMfHkcwmY_37C4uvP_BUrP4AUs0U8EJocEZUB7JIJA

Reply
Aug 23, 2022 14:49:40   #
Big Kahuna
 
moldyoldy wrote:
It seems that Barr could be in big trouble for lying about the results of the mueller investigation.


Highly unlikely but Mueller and Comey may be under investigations soon after the 2022 e******ns.

Reply
 
 
Aug 23, 2022 15:04:51   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
slatten49 wrote:
Simply offering more proof of the integrity in our nation's e******n processes.


A recount of v**es in 8 counties in Kansas is "more proof of the integrity in our nation's e******n processes"?

Seriously, slat, you certainly avoided logic, reason and common sense to stretch that one.

You can recount v**es until you are blue in the face, but how do you verify or confirm that all the v**es you are counting are valid? Mail-in b****ts are nearly impossible to validate.

Recounts haven’t been useful in resolving fraud concerns, as they merely involve recounting the same potentially fraudulent b****ts. Signature verification is far from perfect, as e******n employees have as little as five seconds to check a signature.

‘Ripe for error’: B****t signature verification is flawed — and a big factor in the e******n

Reply
Aug 23, 2022 15:08:12   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
slatten49 wrote:
Simply offering more proof of the integrity in our nation's e******n processes.


I think you missed the basic point. It is boring and quite tiresome. You have completely lost any credibility as a centrist.

Reply
Aug 23, 2022 16:01:16   #
moldyoldy
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
A recount of v**es in 8 counties in Kansas is "more proof of the integrity in our nation's e******n processes"?

Seriously, slat, you certainly avoided logic, reason and common sense to stretch that one.

You can recount v**es until you are blue in the face, but how do you verify or confirm that all the v**es you are counting are valid? Mail-in b****ts are nearly impossible to validate.

Recounts haven’t been useful in resolving fraud concerns, as they merely involve recounting the same potentially fraudulent b****ts. Signature verification is far from perfect, as e******n employees have as little as five seconds to check a signature.

‘Ripe for error’: B****t signature verification is flawed — and a big factor in the e******n
A recount of v**es in 8 counties in Kansas is &quo... (show quote)




Arizona the land of the fraudit has had mail in v****g for over twenty years. No problem until trump needed an excuse for losing.


https://www.azcleane******ns.gov/e******n-security/the-security-of-v****g-by-mail

https://www.azmirror.com/2022/06/13/republicans-helped-arizona-champion-v****g-by-mail-now-they-want-it-gone/

Reply
Aug 23, 2022 16:40:38   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
slatten49 wrote:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-e******n-recount-explainer-idUSKBN27Q38K

As offered earlier, the Kansas recount results provided additional proof that our nation's e******ns are fair and accurate, regardless of the issue(s) or names on the b****t(s).

As for Michigan in 2020...

https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/e******ns/2020/11/04/michigan-e******n-b****ts-mail-absentee-hour-count-update/6161367002/?fbclid=IwAR0NM4hlF1b3gNr02AMfHkcwmY_37C4uvP_BUrP4AUs0U8EJocEZUB7JIJA
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-e******n-re... (show quote)


Hey Slat,
Not challenging, just looking at headlines and added a thought.
More digging and reading to vet than I care to do at this time.
Take care

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.