woodguru

Justice and accountability has nothing to do with h**e, who taught you to h**e?

woodguru

I know it's hard to understand an AG that doesn't give up anything about what he is doing or where things are going after a president and AG that always had their bombshell revelations in the media...but this is the way it works, you will never know what the DOJ has got until they take actions on it.

If you were paying attention to ongoing court cases and investigations it would be utterly ridiculous to say they don't have anything, if anything they have so many things it makes it harder to focus and narrow down to the best things to charge.

I think it's a mistake to go after complicated hard to prove things, he has openly violated laws in public view that he needs to be charged with, and removing boxes of documents is highly illegal, the severity determined by what the nature of them are. Speculative leaks are that it was the highest level of national security possible...eyes only documents that are a threat to national security.

microphor Loc: Home is TN

In that case, we should do that with all Presidents. You are just more evidence that Trump is being targeted. Otherwise why would you not insist that for all Presidents.

Ted_68

Hey what about that f**e American president that has NEVER turned over a single document for his yet to be built Library. Erick stick’em up holder and susie white rice also donated all there documents to the Nobel institute . Yet few can be seen as they are all being Digitized for safer preservation for future scholars to interact with. I think in future generations they will still understand how to interact with, uh paper. This post was just edited by me

elledee

They call it everything but what it is endless abuse of power that they have been grabbing since they got bribem illegally elected...The demonrats have gotten away with so much corruption they are literally power mad. Can you imagine if the republicans went after a demonrat and used 35 million tax dollars trying to pin something on them based on lies...they would be pissing their pants.

microphor Loc: Home is TN

We have higher standards then the Dems.

jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

N**i Germany was the prior POTUS. This was the Justice department giving notice that if you break the law you will answer for no one should be above the law

microphor Loc: Home is TN

Does that include drunk drivers who cause injuries and walk with away with a misdemeanor or is that only for opposing parties?

F.D.R.

Just a thought. Suppose that the feds already had those 'alleged missing docs' and will now claim that they got them from Mara Lago? Based on their h**e and fear of Trump might they not fabricate a case?

Ricktloml

Notice all this outrageous political persecution is just fine with the Democrat/C*******t Party useful i***t faction. We KNOW that the Democrat/C*******t Party/Obama/Hillary tried for over 3 years/wasted millions of dollars in tax-payer money to FRAME a sitting president/overturn the results of the 2016 e******n/tried to remove a duly elected president from office using lies/career bureaucrats who h**e Donald Trump. Sounds like s******n. There has been ZERO accountability. It shouldn't surprise anyone the depths to which these evil/malicious/so far unchecked wanna-be dictators are operating in blatant disregard for the rule-of-law. The Democrat Party is the home of liars/c***ts/anti-American left-wing/socialists/c*******ts whose goal it is to "fundamentally t***sform" America into another failed left-wing/socialist/c*******t style dictatorship that the left craves.

elledee

He's one nasty h**eful SOB isn't he...she... wh**ever

Wonttakeitanymore

Zombie! Investigate ur unelected fools running the country! Starting with ovomit citizenry

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Amendment IV, US Constitution
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects,
against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrant shall issue,
but upon probable cause, supported by Oath of affirmation, and particularly describing
the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Probable cause: The officer should give reasonable information to support the possibility that the evidence of illegality will be found. Such information may come from the officer’ personal observations or that of an informant. If the warrant lacks accurate information as to what will be searched, the search is unlawful. See Groh v. Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551 (2004).

Particularity: The warrant should describe the place to be searched with particularity. The requirement that warrants shall particularly describe the things to be seized makes general searches under them impossible and prevents the seizure of one thing under a warrant describing another. As to what is to be taken, nothing is left to the discretion of the officer executing the warrant.” This requirement thus acts to limit the scope of the search, as the executing officers should be limited to looking in places where the described object could be expected to be found. The purpose of the particularity requirement extends beyond prevention of general searches; it also assures the person whose property is being searched of the lawful authority of the executing officer and of the limits of his power to search. It follows, therefore, that the warrant itself must describe with particularity the items to be seized, or that such itemization must appear in documents incorporated by reference in the warrant and actually shown to the person whose property is to be searched. United States v. Grubbs, 547 U.S. 90 (2006).

Required authorization: Signed by a “neutral and detached” magistrate or judge. See Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (1971).
Bruce Reinhart is the federal judge who approved the warrant that allowed FBI agents to raid Trump's south Florida resort. A look at judge Reinhart's history as an attorney and magistrate judge is revealing.
Reinhart donated big bucks to Obama's campaign, and before taking the bench, Reinhart worked in private practice for 10 years after serving as an assistant U.S. attorney in South Florida from 1996 to 2008.

According to the Miami Herald, Reinhart abruptly left the U.S. attorney's office on Jan. 1, 2008. By the next day, he was representing key Epstein employees.

Importantly, Reinhart worked in the same U.S. attorney's office that was at the time prosecuting Epstein for sexual crimes against children. That office cut Epstein a sweetheart deal that allowed him to plead guilty to lesser state charges, and he essentially avoided serving any time in jail.

For his part, Reinhart denied that he ever represented Epstein himself. But he admitted to representing Epstein's employees, including his pilots, "his scheduler, Sarah Kellen; and Nadia Marcinkova, described by some victims as Epstein’s sex s***e," the Herald reported in 2018.

In 2011, Reinhart was named in the Crime Victims’ Rights Act lawsuit, which accused him of violating Justice Department policies by switching sides, implying that he leveraged inside information about Epstein’s investigation to curry favor with Epstein. Reinhart, in a sworn declaration attached to the CVRA case, denied the allegation, saying he did not participate in Epstein’s criminal case and “never learned any confidential, non-public information about the Epstein matter.’’

Questions:

Why do the exact details of the warrant remain under government seal?
Does the warrant meet the legal and constitutional requirements for:
* probable cause (there is a difference between probable cause and suspicion),
* particularity of persons or property to be seized,
* and for authorization by a "neutral and detached" (impartial) magistrate?
Did the petitioners for the warrant have probable cause to determine there was incriminating evidence in Trump's private safe, or was it mere suspicion that prompted FBI agents to break into the safe?
Why are FBI agents indiscriminately seizing boxes, cartons, cases, documents, luggage, and other materials
without examining the contents to determine if they meet all the requirements for probable cause and particularity before removing them from Trump's private home?
What possible reason exists for FBI agents to rifle through Melania's closets and wardrobe? Was it probable cause or mere suspicion?

A blanket search warrant is a broad authorization from a judge that allows the police to search multiple areas for evidence without specifying exactly what they are looking for and seize everything found.
The Fourth Amendment provides that “no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” Accordingly, in Stanford v. Texas the Supreme Court asserted that this Constitutional requirement protects against “the use of general warrants as instruments of oppression. Therefore, blanket search warrants are unconstitutional, and all evidence obtained under the blanket warrant must be excluded from the trial of the defendant.

We have long known the DOJ and its LE arm, the FBI, are politically corrupted bureaucracies not bound by our Constitution or the Rule of Law.

The raid on Mara-a-Lago is nothing more than a continuation of the democrat socialist "Witch Hunt".
The b***hes are hell bent on removing Donald Trump and anything and anyone even remotely associated with him from the face of the earth, and that includes the Americans who support him.

Constitutional lawyer Alan Dershowitz has described the raid as "unconstitutional" and "absolutely outrageous,"

So, FK all of you l*****t cretins, your wickedness will undoubtedly be well documented in the historical records.

.

Justice is one thing, vengeance is quite another.

Jim0001 Loc: originally from Tennessee, now Virginia, USA

" So the FBI were being thourogh". You have to be thorough when you are planting evidence. How about the Clinton's stealing White House property when they left? Or all the documents Obama took with him? Or James Comey taking classified documents home with him? These violations of 18 USC were never prosecuted. This is a witch hunt pure and simple because the elites are afraid of POTUS Trump's looming re-e******n.

microphor Loc: Home is TN