Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois

In the first statewide v**e since Roe v. Wade was struck down, Kansas v**ers rejected a constitutional amendment that would have given the legislature the power to restrict a******n.

The amendment would have reversed a 2019 state Supreme Court ruling that the state constitution’s protection of “natural inalienable rights” including “personal autonomy” extended to the right to a******n. V**ers rejected the amendment by 20 points. It’s not clear whether that’s an accurate reading of Kansans’ real beliefs about a******n, or if they were swayed by it being too soon since the Roe overturn and all the hysteria over it, or the millions of dollars spent on the race by a******n providers and proponents from outside the state.

While I’m saddened and disappointed by the outcome, this is something that pro-life-activists need to prepare for. If Roe v. Wade was ever overturned, the issue would return to the states where it belongs, and then the battle would move to a new front: winning over hearts and minds of the v**ers in each individual state. Just as the pro-a******n side will eventually have to stop screaming and threatening Supreme Court Justices and realize that they’ve got to make their case to state v**ers, the pro-life side needs to develop strategies to counter the tsunami of misinformation and obfuscation from the people who call k*****g babies in the womb “reproductive health care.”

It's going to be a long, 50-front campaign, and this v**e was only the first skirmish.

son of witless

A thoughtful commentary.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Very thoughtfull.

And on a political note, thinking they can outlaw a******n no matter what, that it is murder from the moment of conception, not even knowing for sure in God's eyes, they are setting themselves up to lose in November.

The dems are going to hang their hats on a******n in November. As awful as it sounds, to be able to a******n an unwanted pregnancy is more important than the economy, inflation, costs of gas, availability of basic necessities and the border.

Sad but true.

Marty 2020 Loc: Banana Republic of Kalifornia

Your liberal wife has gotten the better of you!
Yes it sounds awful because it is awful.
Unwanted pregnancy cannot be the cause of murder!
By that premise, if I have an unwanted wife, I’ll just k**l her.
Fight back against your loser wife!

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

She doesn't go so far as it being used for borth control. Just when there is reasonable medical necessity.

Marty 2020 Loc: Banana Republic of Kalifornia

Consider this scenario.
The WEF believes that there’s too many people on earth.
They think they are entitled to decide who lives and who dies.
They decide you are inconvenient and sentence you to die.
You don’t get a say in it.
How is that different from a******n?

jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

Marty go back to the future or back back to the past as your logic makes no sense. Kanas v**ers made the right choice. I believe that a******n should only be for health of the Mother or in cases of Rape

Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois

Then we should have over 99% less a******ns because in over 99% of a******ns the mother's health isn't in danger.

jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

I agree but rape and incest and the immediate health of the mother all 50 states should have the law stated as such in my opinion. That ten yr old would fall under those guidelines and she is real.

Marty 2020 Loc: Banana Republic of Kalifornia

The point, Einstein, is that the baby has no say.
That’s the problem!
Are you worth $10 million or more?
If not, gates and soros and the asshole running WEF will after birth abort you.
You have no choice or defense.
You okay with that?

jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

what about rape ding dong

Marty 2020 Loc: Banana Republic of Kalifornia

What about it?
I’m adopted and because my parents couldn’t have kids due to a WW2 navy injury, they happily adopted 3 kids. Who knows why we were available.

jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

Well Marty I believe that there should be for rape, and incest and if the mothers immediate health dictates it with no other exceptions

Marty 2020 Loc: Banana Republic of Kalifornia

You’re assuming that incest involves a woman that said no.
You’re not from the backwoods are you?😂😂😂

jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

well your not sure where you are from Mcflie