JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Couple questions for you man made c*****e c****e believers?

1) if we change the U.S. climate (weather) is it good for the U.S.?
2) Do we benefit more from lowering the temperature or raising it?
3) if our green policies affect the climate will those changes be positive or negative for other countries?
4) How do changes made in the U.S. to lower green house gases affect positive, worldwide change, when the countries with the biggest carbon footprints increase their output of green house gases?
5) How much of your current quality of life are you willing to sacrifice to lower your carbon footprint?

Gatsby

I hereby promise that my "carbon footprint" will never exceed that of Al Gore!

son of witless

We have gone back in time to when stupid people believed that bad weather was a sign of sinning and that it could be controlled by men. In Ancient Egypt the Pharaoh was believed to be a God. If the rains in the African Mountains did not fall and the Nile Flood failed to enrich their soils, then the Pharaoh was to blame as the people starved.


Primitive peoples from the beginning of time dealt with droughts, floods, storms, cold spells, and heat waves. They had no clue as to the causes, but like our Modern Day Global Warmers they needed scapegoats. Now instead of an animal sacrifice to appease the Weather Deities, the stupids go around flattening the tires of SUVs.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

I doubt if any progressives will even attempt to answer any of these questions.

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

Well put

JR-57 Loc: South Carolina

1) I don’t think we should try and change the weather. It would be very climaphobic to even consider. We don’t even know how the weather identifies or what the weather wants. It’s bad enough we may be using the wrong pronoun when we say Mother Nature.
2) I think we could benefit from both, especially if we can set it up on an annual cycle. As an example; coldest in the first quarter, warmer in the second quarter, warmest in the third quarter, and cooler in the fourth quarter then start the cycle over again. I know it seems like a huge challenge but I think it’s worth a try.
3) Like everything else, no matter what we do regarding climate, we will have a negative impact on the rest of the world and all of their negative issues will be the result of our actions. Just face it; we’re all a bunch of no goods that have never done anything positive for the world.
4) We need to stop being so selfish and reduce our carbon footprint equal to or greater than the increase of the carbon footprint of all the other countries combined. It’s only right considering what a miserable nation we’ve been since our founding. It’s time we start paying back for all the damage we’ve done, in every aspect.
5) I’m willing to sacrifice everything up to the point of death. I’d like to stick around long enough to see everyone else be so happy from all my sacrifices. I’m hoping they’ll like me then. Now that I’ve said that, I think it sounds selfish. I’ll need to reconsider if I can sacrifice myself for the benefit of other countries. Let me get back to you on this one.

JR-57 Loc: South Carolina

son of witless

They can't. If they dare to join a debate, they quickly declare victory, insult their betters, and then retreat with their tails between their legs faster than Joe Biden getting out of Afghanistan, and more pleased with themselves than H****r B***n high on cocaine chasing a crack whore around a hotel room.

Marty 2020 Loc: Banana Republic of Kalifornia

This thread is FUNNY!