A few things for you
Jul 30, 2022 13:05:24 #
POLITICSPolls Show Growing Number of Americans Pulling the Plug on Democrats’ ‘C*****e C****e’ Hysteria
ByAdminPublished on July 30, 2022SHARETWEET5 COMMENTS
PROMOTED CONTENT
The left has tried every trick in their “g****l w*****g” bible to convince the majority of Americans that c*****e c****e is not only real, but it’s also urgent. Or, as Special P**********l Envoy for Climate [ROFL emoji] John Kerry and other “c*****e c****e” loons love to say, with great drama: the existential threat of mankind.
Considering that “existential” refers to existence (hence, the very existence or extinction of mankind), c*****e c****e loons like world-renowned climatologist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — who has literally said, “The world is going to end in 12 years if we don’t address c*****e c****e” — continue to run around frantically, tilting at windmills [pun intended] that do not exist.
The question is, how’s all of that hyperbolic hysteria working out? The answer is: it isn’t.
Moreover, as observed by David Horowitz and John Perazo in a Frontpage Mag column titled, Rigging the War on F****l F**ls, America’s taxpayers are being screwed in the process. But first, let’s check in with a few polls to see how well the Democrats’ c*****e c****e/green new deal scheme is playing out.
As noted by Horrowitz and Perazo, with the 2022 midterms quickly approaching, a New York Times/Siena College poll found that just one percent of registered v**ers view c*****e c****e as a “top priority” — far from the “existential threat” hysteria of the left.
“Top priorities” identified were inflation concerns, the economy as a whole, record and ever-worsening crime rates, and the humanitarian crisis purposely created by the Biden Border Crisis™. Significantly, even among v**ers younger than 30, the demographic that is typically most fired up about environmental policy, the number was just three percent.
And in September 2020, a Gallup poll also found that c*****e c****e ranked 11th in a list of registered v**ers’ top concerns – again, well behind the same items listed in the Pew poll.
So obsessive is the focus of Democrat leaders on the alleged “existential threat of c*****e c****e,” that a centerpiece of their policies to oppose it is a war on f****l f**ls, beginning with the canceling of the Keystone pipeline, the shutting down of the ANWR oil field in Alaska, and the refusal for more than 17 months to sell oil-and-gas drilling leases on federal lands.
An economic consensus that includes such influential voices as former Obama Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, has singled out the war on f****l f**ls as the chief driver of rising gas prices and the record inflation in the economy as a whole.
Yet, despite the lack of public support, and the immediate destructive consequences of the anti-c*****e c****e policies, the radical leadership of the Democrat policy is adamant in pursuing them.
According to Bernie Sanders, a lifetime supporter of c*******t dictators and bankrupt socialist regimes, “the climate crisis is not only the single greatest challenge facing our country,” but “is also our single greatest opportunity to build a more just and equitable future,” by which he means a bankrupt, socialist dictatorship.
Horrowitz and Perazo go into great depth about the Democrats’ “Green New Deal,” announced in February 2019 by Democrat Senator Ed Markey and the aforementioned congresswoman, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Interestingly, as noted by Horrowitz and Perazo, the ridiculous scheme was already supported by 600 l*****t organizations, as well as 67 House Members and 11 U.S. Senators — all Democrats. Go figure.
Among the myriad of Green New Dealt pipedreams, as noted by Horrowitz and Perazo:
[T]he U.S. economy to achieve “net zero greenhouse gas emissions” by the year 2030 and, in the words of Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, to “t***sition off all nuclear and all f****l f**ls as soon as possible.”
The Green New Deal would also mandate: (a) trillions of dollars in inflationary public expenditures on government-approved, energy-saving “upgrades” and “retrofits” of all existing homes and businesses in the United States, and (b) zero-carbon standards for all new building construction.
So, where would the trillions of dollars come from, you ask? In addition to taxpayer subsidies to left-wing university institutions, noted the authors, the IRS has already granted tax-exempt status to a vast number of 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations and charitable foundations that seek to permanently institutionalize the Green New Deal and its agendas — agendas that are never going to happen.
The bottom line:
Meanwhile, Joe Biden, AOC, John Kerry, Bernie Sanders, Lizzie Warren, and the remainder of the radicalized Democrat Party continue to try their damnedest to scare the bejesus out of sensible Americans, while poll after poll continues to show a vast majority of us no longer give a damn.
Assuming, of course, we ever did.
-----------------------------------------------------------
2. POLITICSBREAKING: House V**e Is in on Assault Weapons Bill
ByAdminPublished on July 30, 2022SHARETWEET6 COMMENTS
The House just barely passed a bill to ban assault weapons in a squeaker of a v**e, 217-213, on Friday. From me or what they call "assault weapons," I don't think they'd know one if they were shot by one.
It was scheduled at the last minute, when House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) had originally said that it would be scheduled for next month.
While most Republicans lined up against it, Rep. Chris Jacobs (R-NY) and Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) crossed the aisle and supported it, while five Democrats v**ed against it — Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-TX), Rep. Jared Golden (D-ME), Rep. Vicente Gonzalez (D-TX), Rep. Kurt Schrader (D-OR), and Rep. Ron Kind (D-WI).
The bill is ridiculous — targeting AR-15s and things that look “scary” to Democrats, the Hill reports: Me again, as I told you before, paint them pink and they'love them. They did before they knew that they were ARs. Silly rabbits.
The assault weapons ban legislation, led by Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.) and co-sponsored by 207 v****g Democrats, specifically calls for prohibiting the sale, manufacture, t***sfer or import of various semi-automatic assault weapons, semi-automatic pistols and semi-automatic shotguns, depending on their features.
For example, all semi-automatic rifles that can accept detachable magazines and have a pistol grip, a forward grip, a grenade launcher, a barrel shroud, a threaded barrel or a folding, telescoping or detachable stock are subject to the ban.
Semi-automatic assault rifles with fixed magazines that can accept more than 15 rounds are subject to the ban would also be prohibited under the legislation, except those with an attached tubular device that can only hold .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.
It’s likely to die in the Senate because of strong opposition–and that’s making our friend, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) very unhappy.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Timing of this is late, but it just showed up.
Damning WH Visitor Logs, Emails Surface – Tie Joe Biden Directly to H****r’s Business Partners: Report
On the 2020 campaign trail, Joe Biden insisted he had never talked to son H****r about his overseas business dealings in places such as Ukraine and China.
All right, then: Why did 14 of H****r B***n’s business associates meet with Joe Biden during the time when he was vice president in the Obama administration?
According to a report from Fox News on Thursday, over a dozen individuals doing business with the wayward son of the current president when he was veep had meetings with Joe between 2009 and 2017 — including individuals from the United States, China, Kazakhstan, Mexico and Ukraine.
Biden has consistently denied knowledge of any of H****r’s business dealings abroad — especially controversial dealings with Chinese energy firm CEFC and Ukrainian energy giant Burisma.
“I have never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings,” Biden told reporters during a campaign stop in Iowa in 2019.
That statement was already dubious before a voicemail archived on H****r B***n’s laptop indicated Joe had talked with his son about a New York Times piece on CEFC that mentioned H****r’s involvement.
by TaboolaSponsored LinksYou May Like
Prime Is Now $139, But Few Know This Saving Trick
ExpertsInMoney.co
These 3 Retailers Are Overcharging Their Customers (Here's Why)
ExpertsInMoney.co
Here's The Average Price Of A Gutter Protection
LeafFilter Partner
Biden told his son he had read the piece and that “I think you’re clear.”
So, he’d clearly spoken to H****r about his overseas business dealings. But if you were a Joe Biden defender, you might say this is just one context-free voicemail message about the CEFC deal. Is he supposed to reveal that to reporters when asked if he’s spoken to H****r about his overseas business dealings?
Even if you believe the answer to that question is no, I think you might agree it would be nice to know at least 14 of H****r’s business associates got meetings with Joe Biden while he was vice president. That’s the number Fox News could corroborate via Obama White House visitor logs and emails.
For instance: “Two of H****r’s Mexican business associates, Miguel Aleman Velasco and Miguel Aleman Magnani visited the West Wing on Feb. 26, 2014, according to the Obama White House visitor logs, and Joe was later photographed with H****r giving Velasco and Magnani a tour of the White House Brady Press Briefing room,” the report said.
“Emails, which were reviewed by Fox News Digital, from more than a year later showed that H****r arranged a video conference with his father and Carlos Slim, a Mexican billionaire with whom H****r was seeking to do business with at the time, on Oct. 30, 2015.
“Less than a month after the video conference, Slim, Velasco and Magnani attended a meeting with Joe, H****r, and H****r’s business partner and family friend Jeff Cooper at the vice p**********l residence at Number One Observatory Circle, Washington D.C., according to photos dated Nov. 19, 2015 and published by The Daily Mail.”
This was during a period when H****r and Jeff Cooper were pursuing an investment in a Mexican energy company with the three Mexican magnates. Slim, it’s worth noting, is currently the 12th-richest man in the world, according to Forbes — wealthier than Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg — and certainly the most famous business magnate in all of Central America.
Are we to assume that no discussion went on about why H****r was bringing one of the most famous billionaires in the world to the vice p**********l residence? Nothing like: “Say, uh, son, how do you and Carlos Slim know each other? Golfing buddies? In a fantasy football league together?”
That’s something I’d probably want to know if I were the vice president — and if Joe Biden didn’t pursue that conversation, that’s being willfully negligent about potential influence-peddling on the part of his son for the purposes of plausible deniability. That’s worse than having a conversation with H****r about his foreign business dealings.
Then there was a dinner at Café Milano in Washington on April 16, 2015. As meet-and-greets with H****r’s foreign friends go, this was a truly international affair: Business associates from Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine were present, Fox News reported.
The dinner included the late Moscow Mayor Yury Luzhkov and his wife, Russian billionaire Yelena Baturina. The latter is more important, given that she was in business with H****r’s firm.
Then there was Vadym Pozharskyi, an executive at Burisma, the Ukrainian firm which employed H****r as a board member.
Finally, we have former Kazakhstan Prime Minister Karim Massimov and Kazakh businessman Kenes Rakishev. On the guest list for the event, they were potentially described as “our KZ friends” — and, indeed, H****r would hope they would be good friends, considering he was trying to put together a deal with a Kazakh-based Chinese energy company and Burisma at the time.
Another business partner of H****r’s who met with Joe, albeit after he left the vice presidency? Tony Bobulinski. You may remember him as the partner in the CEFC deal who said that a cryptic reference to equity in the deal being held for “the big guy” referred to Joe Biden.
“Text messages obtained by Fox News Digital indicated that a meeting took place, though it’s unclear what the substance of the meeting may have been,” the outlet reported.
“Great to meet u and spend some time together, please thank Joe for his time, was great to talk thx Tony b,” read one text from Bobulinski to Joe’s brother Jim on May 2, 2017.
Ironic, then, that Fox News’ report appeared just one day after the New York Post broke a story that the same business partner who made the reference to “the big guy” receiving equity in the email about the CEFC deal also referred to Joe Biden as “the Big Guy” in frantic text messages sent on the day the Post broke the story about H****r B***n’s laptop in October 2020.
James Gilliar, the man who sent “the big guy” email, was asked in a text exchange if “H****r and/or Joe or Joe’s campaign [would] try to make it ‘Oh, we were never involved’ … and try to basically make us collateral damage?”
“I don’t see how that would work for them… I think in the scenario that he wins they would just leave sleeping dogs lie,” Gilliar responded.
Then: “If they lose, honestly, I don’t think that the Big Guy really cares about that because he’ll be too busy focusing on all the other s*** he is doing.”
Bobulinski insisted from the beginning that Gilliar was referring to Biden — and given Gilliar used the same language to refer to him in a separate text exchange, that certainly lends credibility to Bobulinski’s account of the tangled affair of H****r B***n’s blatant influence-peddling and how close Joe was to it.
Thus, consider what Bobulinski had to say about the matter in October 2020: “I’ve seen Vice President Biden saying he never talked to H****r about his business. I’ve seen firsthand that that’s not true, because it wasn’t just H****r’s business, they said they were putting the Biden family name and its legacy on the line.”
They certainly were — and now things aren’t looking so hot for “the big guy” or his son.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
ByAdminPublished on July 30, 2022SHARETWEET5 COMMENTS
PROMOTED CONTENT
The left has tried every trick in their “g****l w*****g” bible to convince the majority of Americans that c*****e c****e is not only real, but it’s also urgent. Or, as Special P**********l Envoy for Climate [ROFL emoji] John Kerry and other “c*****e c****e” loons love to say, with great drama: the existential threat of mankind.
Considering that “existential” refers to existence (hence, the very existence or extinction of mankind), c*****e c****e loons like world-renowned climatologist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — who has literally said, “The world is going to end in 12 years if we don’t address c*****e c****e” — continue to run around frantically, tilting at windmills [pun intended] that do not exist.
The question is, how’s all of that hyperbolic hysteria working out? The answer is: it isn’t.
Moreover, as observed by David Horowitz and John Perazo in a Frontpage Mag column titled, Rigging the War on F****l F**ls, America’s taxpayers are being screwed in the process. But first, let’s check in with a few polls to see how well the Democrats’ c*****e c****e/green new deal scheme is playing out.
As noted by Horrowitz and Perazo, with the 2022 midterms quickly approaching, a New York Times/Siena College poll found that just one percent of registered v**ers view c*****e c****e as a “top priority” — far from the “existential threat” hysteria of the left.
“Top priorities” identified were inflation concerns, the economy as a whole, record and ever-worsening crime rates, and the humanitarian crisis purposely created by the Biden Border Crisis™. Significantly, even among v**ers younger than 30, the demographic that is typically most fired up about environmental policy, the number was just three percent.
And in September 2020, a Gallup poll also found that c*****e c****e ranked 11th in a list of registered v**ers’ top concerns – again, well behind the same items listed in the Pew poll.
So obsessive is the focus of Democrat leaders on the alleged “existential threat of c*****e c****e,” that a centerpiece of their policies to oppose it is a war on f****l f**ls, beginning with the canceling of the Keystone pipeline, the shutting down of the ANWR oil field in Alaska, and the refusal for more than 17 months to sell oil-and-gas drilling leases on federal lands.
An economic consensus that includes such influential voices as former Obama Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, has singled out the war on f****l f**ls as the chief driver of rising gas prices and the record inflation in the economy as a whole.
Yet, despite the lack of public support, and the immediate destructive consequences of the anti-c*****e c****e policies, the radical leadership of the Democrat policy is adamant in pursuing them.
According to Bernie Sanders, a lifetime supporter of c*******t dictators and bankrupt socialist regimes, “the climate crisis is not only the single greatest challenge facing our country,” but “is also our single greatest opportunity to build a more just and equitable future,” by which he means a bankrupt, socialist dictatorship.
Horrowitz and Perazo go into great depth about the Democrats’ “Green New Deal,” announced in February 2019 by Democrat Senator Ed Markey and the aforementioned congresswoman, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Interestingly, as noted by Horrowitz and Perazo, the ridiculous scheme was already supported by 600 l*****t organizations, as well as 67 House Members and 11 U.S. Senators — all Democrats. Go figure.
Among the myriad of Green New Dealt pipedreams, as noted by Horrowitz and Perazo:
[T]he U.S. economy to achieve “net zero greenhouse gas emissions” by the year 2030 and, in the words of Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, to “t***sition off all nuclear and all f****l f**ls as soon as possible.”
The Green New Deal would also mandate: (a) trillions of dollars in inflationary public expenditures on government-approved, energy-saving “upgrades” and “retrofits” of all existing homes and businesses in the United States, and (b) zero-carbon standards for all new building construction.
So, where would the trillions of dollars come from, you ask? In addition to taxpayer subsidies to left-wing university institutions, noted the authors, the IRS has already granted tax-exempt status to a vast number of 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations and charitable foundations that seek to permanently institutionalize the Green New Deal and its agendas — agendas that are never going to happen.
The bottom line:
Meanwhile, Joe Biden, AOC, John Kerry, Bernie Sanders, Lizzie Warren, and the remainder of the radicalized Democrat Party continue to try their damnedest to scare the bejesus out of sensible Americans, while poll after poll continues to show a vast majority of us no longer give a damn.
Assuming, of course, we ever did.
-----------------------------------------------------------
2. POLITICSBREAKING: House V**e Is in on Assault Weapons Bill
ByAdminPublished on July 30, 2022SHARETWEET6 COMMENTS
The House just barely passed a bill to ban assault weapons in a squeaker of a v**e, 217-213, on Friday. From me or what they call "assault weapons," I don't think they'd know one if they were shot by one.
It was scheduled at the last minute, when House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) had originally said that it would be scheduled for next month.
While most Republicans lined up against it, Rep. Chris Jacobs (R-NY) and Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) crossed the aisle and supported it, while five Democrats v**ed against it — Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-TX), Rep. Jared Golden (D-ME), Rep. Vicente Gonzalez (D-TX), Rep. Kurt Schrader (D-OR), and Rep. Ron Kind (D-WI).
The bill is ridiculous — targeting AR-15s and things that look “scary” to Democrats, the Hill reports: Me again, as I told you before, paint them pink and they'love them. They did before they knew that they were ARs. Silly rabbits.
The assault weapons ban legislation, led by Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.) and co-sponsored by 207 v****g Democrats, specifically calls for prohibiting the sale, manufacture, t***sfer or import of various semi-automatic assault weapons, semi-automatic pistols and semi-automatic shotguns, depending on their features.
For example, all semi-automatic rifles that can accept detachable magazines and have a pistol grip, a forward grip, a grenade launcher, a barrel shroud, a threaded barrel or a folding, telescoping or detachable stock are subject to the ban.
Semi-automatic assault rifles with fixed magazines that can accept more than 15 rounds are subject to the ban would also be prohibited under the legislation, except those with an attached tubular device that can only hold .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.
It’s likely to die in the Senate because of strong opposition–and that’s making our friend, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) very unhappy.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Timing of this is late, but it just showed up.
Damning WH Visitor Logs, Emails Surface – Tie Joe Biden Directly to H****r’s Business Partners: Report
On the 2020 campaign trail, Joe Biden insisted he had never talked to son H****r about his overseas business dealings in places such as Ukraine and China.
All right, then: Why did 14 of H****r B***n’s business associates meet with Joe Biden during the time when he was vice president in the Obama administration?
According to a report from Fox News on Thursday, over a dozen individuals doing business with the wayward son of the current president when he was veep had meetings with Joe between 2009 and 2017 — including individuals from the United States, China, Kazakhstan, Mexico and Ukraine.
Biden has consistently denied knowledge of any of H****r’s business dealings abroad — especially controversial dealings with Chinese energy firm CEFC and Ukrainian energy giant Burisma.
“I have never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings,” Biden told reporters during a campaign stop in Iowa in 2019.
That statement was already dubious before a voicemail archived on H****r B***n’s laptop indicated Joe had talked with his son about a New York Times piece on CEFC that mentioned H****r’s involvement.
by TaboolaSponsored LinksYou May Like
Prime Is Now $139, But Few Know This Saving Trick
ExpertsInMoney.co
These 3 Retailers Are Overcharging Their Customers (Here's Why)
ExpertsInMoney.co
Here's The Average Price Of A Gutter Protection
LeafFilter Partner
Biden told his son he had read the piece and that “I think you’re clear.”
So, he’d clearly spoken to H****r about his overseas business dealings. But if you were a Joe Biden defender, you might say this is just one context-free voicemail message about the CEFC deal. Is he supposed to reveal that to reporters when asked if he’s spoken to H****r about his overseas business dealings?
Even if you believe the answer to that question is no, I think you might agree it would be nice to know at least 14 of H****r’s business associates got meetings with Joe Biden while he was vice president. That’s the number Fox News could corroborate via Obama White House visitor logs and emails.
For instance: “Two of H****r’s Mexican business associates, Miguel Aleman Velasco and Miguel Aleman Magnani visited the West Wing on Feb. 26, 2014, according to the Obama White House visitor logs, and Joe was later photographed with H****r giving Velasco and Magnani a tour of the White House Brady Press Briefing room,” the report said.
“Emails, which were reviewed by Fox News Digital, from more than a year later showed that H****r arranged a video conference with his father and Carlos Slim, a Mexican billionaire with whom H****r was seeking to do business with at the time, on Oct. 30, 2015.
“Less than a month after the video conference, Slim, Velasco and Magnani attended a meeting with Joe, H****r, and H****r’s business partner and family friend Jeff Cooper at the vice p**********l residence at Number One Observatory Circle, Washington D.C., according to photos dated Nov. 19, 2015 and published by The Daily Mail.”
This was during a period when H****r and Jeff Cooper were pursuing an investment in a Mexican energy company with the three Mexican magnates. Slim, it’s worth noting, is currently the 12th-richest man in the world, according to Forbes — wealthier than Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg — and certainly the most famous business magnate in all of Central America.
Are we to assume that no discussion went on about why H****r was bringing one of the most famous billionaires in the world to the vice p**********l residence? Nothing like: “Say, uh, son, how do you and Carlos Slim know each other? Golfing buddies? In a fantasy football league together?”
That’s something I’d probably want to know if I were the vice president — and if Joe Biden didn’t pursue that conversation, that’s being willfully negligent about potential influence-peddling on the part of his son for the purposes of plausible deniability. That’s worse than having a conversation with H****r about his foreign business dealings.
Then there was a dinner at Café Milano in Washington on April 16, 2015. As meet-and-greets with H****r’s foreign friends go, this was a truly international affair: Business associates from Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine were present, Fox News reported.
The dinner included the late Moscow Mayor Yury Luzhkov and his wife, Russian billionaire Yelena Baturina. The latter is more important, given that she was in business with H****r’s firm.
Then there was Vadym Pozharskyi, an executive at Burisma, the Ukrainian firm which employed H****r as a board member.
Finally, we have former Kazakhstan Prime Minister Karim Massimov and Kazakh businessman Kenes Rakishev. On the guest list for the event, they were potentially described as “our KZ friends” — and, indeed, H****r would hope they would be good friends, considering he was trying to put together a deal with a Kazakh-based Chinese energy company and Burisma at the time.
Another business partner of H****r’s who met with Joe, albeit after he left the vice presidency? Tony Bobulinski. You may remember him as the partner in the CEFC deal who said that a cryptic reference to equity in the deal being held for “the big guy” referred to Joe Biden.
“Text messages obtained by Fox News Digital indicated that a meeting took place, though it’s unclear what the substance of the meeting may have been,” the outlet reported.
“Great to meet u and spend some time together, please thank Joe for his time, was great to talk thx Tony b,” read one text from Bobulinski to Joe’s brother Jim on May 2, 2017.
Ironic, then, that Fox News’ report appeared just one day after the New York Post broke a story that the same business partner who made the reference to “the big guy” receiving equity in the email about the CEFC deal also referred to Joe Biden as “the Big Guy” in frantic text messages sent on the day the Post broke the story about H****r B***n’s laptop in October 2020.
James Gilliar, the man who sent “the big guy” email, was asked in a text exchange if “H****r and/or Joe or Joe’s campaign [would] try to make it ‘Oh, we were never involved’ … and try to basically make us collateral damage?”
“I don’t see how that would work for them… I think in the scenario that he wins they would just leave sleeping dogs lie,” Gilliar responded.
Then: “If they lose, honestly, I don’t think that the Big Guy really cares about that because he’ll be too busy focusing on all the other s*** he is doing.”
Bobulinski insisted from the beginning that Gilliar was referring to Biden — and given Gilliar used the same language to refer to him in a separate text exchange, that certainly lends credibility to Bobulinski’s account of the tangled affair of H****r B***n’s blatant influence-peddling and how close Joe was to it.
Thus, consider what Bobulinski had to say about the matter in October 2020: “I’ve seen Vice President Biden saying he never talked to H****r about his business. I’ve seen firsthand that that’s not true, because it wasn’t just H****r’s business, they said they were putting the Biden family name and its legacy on the line.”
They certainly were — and now things aren’t looking so hot for “the big guy” or his son.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
Jul 30, 2022 13:34:29 #
JuristBooks
Loc: North Carolina
As regards the Assault Rifle (sic) ban, I urge all of you to contact your state legislators to get your Attorney General to act in concert with other A.G.’s and seek “the removal from Office of every Representative that v**ed for the Assault Rifle ban, as it directly violates their Oath of Office.
When these d********g, self-aggrandizing politicians swear “ I will support and defend the Constitution ….” They do not say but, ‘except for the Bill of Rights.’
We need to attack these t*****rs, everywhere you find them. Use grand juries, use state legislators, County Sheriffs….
When these d********g, self-aggrandizing politicians swear “ I will support and defend the Constitution ….” They do not say but, ‘except for the Bill of Rights.’
We need to attack these t*****rs, everywhere you find them. Use grand juries, use state legislators, County Sheriffs….
Jul 31, 2022 14:12:14 #
JuristBooks wrote:
As regards the Assault Rifle (sic) ban, I urge all... (show quote)
I agree on one hand, on the other, too long and few will pay attention. Unfortunately we are living with scared bunnies.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.