Parky60
Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
This is scary. I’m not even a lawyer, but I think I might understand Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan’s job better than she does:
HEADLINE
Elena Kagan Claims 'Legitimacy' of Supreme Court Is at Risk When It Strays From Public Opinion
For future reference: No, it’s not the job of the SCOTUS to tailor its rulings to conform to public opinion. It’s their job to ensure that laws abide by the Constitution, regardless of public opinion. That's why we don't pick Justices by popular e******ns or with an "American Idol"-style TV contest.
Parky60 wrote:
This is scary. I’m not even a lawyer, but I think I might understand Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan’s job better than she does:
HEADLINE
Elena Kagan Claims 'Legitimacy' of Supreme Court Is at Risk When It Strays From Public Opinion
For future reference: No, it’s not the job of the SCOTUS to tailor its rulings to conform to public opinion. It’s their job to ensure that laws abide by the Constitution, regardless of public opinion. That's why we don't pick Justices by popular e******ns or with an "American Idol"-style TV contest.
This is scary. I’m not even a lawyer, but I think ... (
show quote)
Pretty scarey, moving SCOTUS toward wokism.
Parky60 wrote:
This is scary. I’m not even a lawyer, but I think I might understand Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan’s job better than she does:
HEADLINE
Elena Kagan Claims 'Legitimacy' of Supreme Court Is at Risk When It Strays From Public Opinion
For future reference: No, it’s not the job of the SCOTUS to tailor its rulings to conform to public opinion. It’s their job to ensure that laws abide by the Constitution, regardless of public opinion. That's why we don't pick Justices by popular e******ns or with an "American Idol"-style TV contest.
This is scary. I’m not even a lawyer, but I think ... (
show quote)
Hopefully she does, because there are six justices who do not.
AuntiE
Loc: 45th Least Free State
woodguru wrote:
Hopefully she does, because there are six justices who do not.
It is not the job of SCOTUS to rule based upon
public opinion but on the
Constitutionality of the case in front of them. Had you taken a basic civics course you would know that fact.
Parky60
Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
woodguru wrote:
Hopefully she does, because there are six justices who do not.
You REALLY deserve this one!
woodguru wrote:
Hopefully she does, because there are six justices who do not.
Only those who h**e the Constitution say that.
Parky30, you don't really believe that common sense is very common, do you? And next you're going to suggest that a person's athletic ability isn't what should determine who runs Fortune 500 companies. YOU'RE SOOO BEHIND THE TIMES ABOUT WHAT'S IMPORTANT!!
Parky60 wrote:
This is scary. I’m not even a lawyer, but I think I might understand Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan’s job better than she does:
HEADLINE
Elena Kagan Claims 'Legitimacy' of Supreme Court Is at Risk When It Strays From Public Opinion
For future reference: No, it’s not the job of the SCOTUS to tailor its rulings to conform to public opinion. It’s their job to ensure that laws abide by the Constitution, regardless of public opinion. That's why we don't pick Justices by popular e******ns or with an "American Idol"-style TV contest.
This is scary. I’m not even a lawyer, but I think ... (
show quote)
***Elena Kagan Claims 'Legitimacy' of Supreme Court Is at Risk When It Strays From Public Opinion
>>>FACT: 'Legitimacy' of Supreme Court Is at Risk When It Strays INTO Public Opinion
Woody, is as usual off base again.
maureenthannon wrote:
Parky30, you don't really believe that common sense is very common, do you? And next you're going to suggest that a person's athletic ability isn't what should determine who runs Fortune 500 companies. YOU'RE SOOO BEHIND THE TIMES ABOUT WHAT'S IMPORTANT!!
WTF are you talking about? This is about Kagen's opinion that she thinks the court should rule on public opinion. The court is there to rule on the Constitutional Law, and nothing else.
Here's YOUR sign:
maureenthannon wrote:
Parky30, you don't really believe that common sense is very common, do you? And next you're going to suggest that a person's athletic ability isn't what should determine who runs Fortune 500 companies. YOU'RE SOOO BEHIND THE TIMES ABOUT WHAT'S IMPORTANT!!
***Parky30, you don't really believe that common sense is very common, do you?
>>>If he has you as an example, I would think that having common sense is certainly not universal
*** And next you're going to suggest that a person's athletic ability isn't what should determine who runs Fortune 500 companies.
>>>What the hell does that have to do with the topic at hand, the idiocy of Kagen's statement.
*** YOU'RE SOOO BEHIND THE TIMES ABOUT WHAT'S IMPORTANT!!
>>>I would think that you don't have the slightest idea about what is important.
maureenthannon wrote:
Parky30, you don't really believe that common sense is very common, do you? And next you're going to suggest that a person's athletic ability isn't what should determine who runs Fortune 500 companies. YOU'RE SOOO BEHIND THE TIMES ABOUT WHAT'S IMPORTANT!!
Some have replied indignantly to this post, but I'm pretty sure it's satire. 🤪
Parky60
Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
Roamin' Catholic wrote:
Some have replied indignantly to this post, but I'm pretty sure it's satire. 🤪
The original post was not satirical.
Roamin' Catholic wrote:
Some have replied indignantly to this post, but I'm pretty sure it's satire. 🤪
If what she posted is satire, she should let us know. If that's what it was, I'll gladly apologise for my post.
AuntiE
Loc: 45th Least Free State
maureenthannon wrote:
Parky30, you don't really believe that common sense is very common, do you? And next you're going to suggest that a person's athletic ability isn't what should determine who runs Fortune 500 companies. YOU'RE SOOO BEHIND THE TIMES ABOUT WHAT'S IMPORTANT!!
If this is meant as a satirical comment, it would behoove you to use some of the
smiles to indicate such.
I'm sure she does, she also knows which side her bread is buttered on....
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.