You far, far right ultra pro-lifers are going to cost us in November.
nwtk2007 wrote:
I'm telling you for sure, if republicans continue to oppose the exceptions to a******n, we are not going to win in November. There must be exceptions for rape, incest and risk to the mother. To even oppose life saving procedures as in ectopic pregnancy is just plain stupid radicalism. To force a mother to forgo cancer treatment when she is carrying a first trimester fetus is just wrong. If she chooses to do that, fine, but forcing her to go 6-7 months with cancer left untreated is wrong.
Yes, these people can go to other states for their a******ns but that isn't going to be what v**ers see. They will only see radical republicans and v**e, once again, for i***ts who will ruin the country even more than is has been since Biden took over.
I'm telling you for sure, if republicans continue ... (
show quote)
Never thought I would be saying this, but I also agree with you 110%!
Like the old saying goes: be careful what you wish for!
nwtk2007 wrote:
I'm telling you for sure, if republicans continue to oppose the exceptions to a******n, we are not going to win in November. There must be exceptions for rape, incest and risk to the mother. To even oppose life saving procedures as in ectopic pregnancy is just plain stupid radicalism. To force a mother to forgo cancer treatment when she is carrying a first trimester fetus is just wrong. If she chooses to do that, fine, but forcing her to go 6-7 months with cancer left untreated is wrong.
Yes, these people can go to other states for their a******ns but that isn't going to be what v**ers see. They will only see radical republicans and v**e, once again, for i***ts who will ruin the country even more than is has been since Biden took over.
I'm telling you for sure, if republicans continue ... (
show quote)
There's more than just the woman at stake here, there's the baby. A woman with cancer will most likely not live much beyond the pregnancy, but the baby will have a lifetime ahead of it. It would take a lot to convince me that k*****g my baby is the right decision to make, knowing I'm not going to be around anyway.
I disagree in the cases of rape and incest. I still would rule in favor of the baby. The baby is paying a BIG price - it's life. The baby can be given up for adoption. There are many people wanting to adopt babies....
I honestly feel that the baby DOES have rights. The fact that they cannot speak for themselves is not a reason to k**l them - for any reason.
God gave us life. It is not right that man should be allowed to take it away - from anyone, no matter how small they are. It's only very recently (in the grand scheme) that a******n has been invented. It's a travesty that women even have the ability to make a decision to k**l their babies before it is born.
Wonttakeitanymore wrote:
Spin it zombie!
Spin is anything that does not jive with your heart felt convictions.
DASHY wrote:
How will the forced-birth laws tell the difference between a miscarriage and an induced miscarriage?
Induced miscarriage is an a******n!
proud republican wrote:
Induced miscarriage is an a******n!
All miscarriages will be suspect and any miscarriage could cost a distraught woman $10,000 plus legal fees if she is deemed prone.
EmilyD wrote:
There's more than just the woman at stake here, there's the baby. A woman with cancer will most likely not live much beyond the pregnancy, but the baby will have a lifetime ahead of it. It would take a lot to convince me that k*****g my baby is the right decision to make, knowing I'm not going to be around anyway.
I disagree in the cases of rape and incest. I still would rule in favor of the baby. The baby is paying a BIG price - it's life. The baby can be given up for adoption. There are many people wanting to adopt babies....
I honestly feel that the baby DOES have rights. The fact that they cannot speak for themselves is not a reason to k**l them - for any reason.
God gave us life. It is not right that man should be allowed to take it away - from anyone, no matter how small they are. It's only very recently (in the grand scheme) that a******n has been invented. It's a travesty that women even have the ability to make a decision to k**l their babies before it is born.
There's more than just the woman at stake here, th... (
show quote)
With all due respect I disagree with you on cancer treatment...I used to work for Cancer center and with today's treatments there's a very good chance that you will survive cancer especially if it's detected in the first trimester...
AuntiE
Loc: 45th Least Free State
nwtk2007 wrote:
I'm telling you for sure, if republicans continue to oppose the exceptions to a******n, we are not going to win in November. There must be exceptions for rape, incest and risk to the mother. To even oppose life saving procedures as in ectopic pregnancy is just plain stupid radicalism. To force a mother to forgo cancer treatment when she is carrying a first trimester fetus is just wrong. If she chooses to do that, fine, but forcing her to go 6-7 months with cancer left untreated is wrong.
Yes, these people can go to other states for their a******ns but that isn't going to be what v**ers see. They will only see radical republicans and v**e, once again, for i***ts who will ruin the country even more than is has been since Biden took over.
I'm telling you for sure, if republicans continue ... (
show quote)
Exactly what jurisdictions are refusing care for
ectopic pregnancy?
Exactly what jurisdictions are refusing
”forgo cancer treatment when she is carrying a first trimester fetus is just wrong.
You are making a lot of accusations with zero links to backup your assertions.By the way, during C***D,Johns Hopkins shutdown all cancer surgery even for stage IV as well as some other treatments.
DASHY wrote:
How will the forced-birth laws tell the difference between a miscarriage and an induced miscarriage?
A miscarriage is spontaneous. Unplanned. Something that is induced is not.
RascalRiley wrote:
All miscarriages will be suspect and any miscarriage could cost a distraught woman $10,000 plus legal fees if she is deemed prone.
A woman has no control over a miscarriage. It happens whenever - not at a specific time and place. It's spontaneous....there is no such thing as an "induced miscarriage"....it's just another term you lefties wants to use in place of the word "a******n".
proud republican wrote:
Induced miscarriage is an a******n!
Who is going to monitor women having a******ns in the privacy of their homes? What specific punishment do you recommend for lady lawbreakers found guilty of having an a******n?
DASHY wrote:
Who is going to monitor women having a******ns in the privacy of their homes? What specific punishment do you recommend for lady lawbreakers found guilty of having an a******n?
Women don't have a******ns "in the privacy of their own homes".... if they are miscarrying at home, they are usually taken by ambulance to a hospital. You should talk to a midwife and stop with these inane questions.
EmilyD wrote:
A miscarriage is spontaneous. Unplanned. Something that is induced is not.
Many innocent women will be harassed. In Texas harassing miscarriages is worth $10,000 plus legal fees
Sex is going to take a hit
DASHY wrote:
Who is going to monitor women having a******ns in the privacy of their homes? What specific punishment do you recommend for lady lawbreakers found guilty of having an a******n?
I don't recommend any punishment...I think it's sad..But miscarriage is not the same as a******n..
RascalRiley wrote:
Many innocent women will be harassed. In Texas harassing miscarriages is worth $10,000 plus legal fees
Sex is going to take a hit
MISCARRIAGE IS NOT A******N!!!!!!!!..GET IT THROUGH YOUR HEAD!!!!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.