One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Coverup Begins: Adam Schiff Files Amendment to NDAA to Hide Democrat Wrongdoing
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jul 8, 2022 17:42:22   #
EmilyD
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Compared to what ?

You.

Reply
Jul 9, 2022 10:10:29   #
WEBCO
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Desperation from the right to deflect from the January sixth crimes.


J****** 6th, don't care about to much. I'm not a pearl clutcher. Simply pointing out the fact that you are talking about an ammendment that is different than the one Schitt is trying to pass to cover up anything the military does. When the government, or the military at least, get shut down and receive no money it will be because of Schitt and this bill.

Reply
Jul 9, 2022 10:44:27   #
moldyoldy
 
WEBCO wrote:
J****** 6th, don't care about to much. I'm not a pearl clutcher. Simply pointing out the fact that you are talking about an ammendment that is different than the one Schitt is trying to pass to cover up anything the military does. When the government, or the military at least, get shut down and receive no money it will be because of Schitt and this bill.



So, the fact that the gop is backing this bill means nothing. It is a Schiff plot.

Reply
 
 
Jul 9, 2022 13:03:51   #
WEBCO
 
moldyoldy wrote:
So, the fact that the gop is backing this bill means nothing. It is a Schiff plot.


Once AGAIN the bill you are referring to, and the ammendments being discussed in this thread are 2 completely different ammendments. Reread the original post and article

Reply
Jul 9, 2022 14:27:14   #
moldyoldy
 
WEBCO wrote:
Once AGAIN the bill you are referring to, and the ammendments being discussed in this thread are 2 completely different ammendments. Reread the original post and article




Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any information obtained by or with the assistance of a member of the Armed Forces in violation of section 1384 of title 18, shall not be received in evidence in any trial, hearing, or other proceedings in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof.

Prostitution near military bases, section 1384 of title 18.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1384

Reply
Jul 10, 2022 04:16:54   #
WEBCO
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any information obtained by or with the assistance of a member of the Armed Forces in violation of section 1384 of title 18, shall not be received in evidence in any trial, hearing, or other proceedings in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof.

Prostitution near military bases, section 1384 of title 18.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1384
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any in... (show quote)


Yes, that's the one. So Adam Schitt is proposing that the US military will NEVER have to hand over ANY documents to ANYBODY ever again. And you "think" that is a good idea?

That includes congress, any inspector general, the president, and even the Secretary of defense.

Why would ANYBODY propose such an illegal and unconstitutional ammendment?
What does that lying piece of excrement want to hide now?

This is not, simply, to hide the malfeasance of the Afghanistan withdrawal. Or the billions pouring into the Ukraine, without ANY oversight. It is to hide the actions/in actions of J****** 6th by the national guard. Plus any culpability in bioweapons development in China and the Ukraine.

Do you really think that the military should have absolutely NO oversight?
The generals in charge would become oligarchs. I spent my entire career in Spec Ops. "Some" oversight is needed. I am still a firm believer in "if you are not going on the Op, then you have NO say in how WE accomplish the Op.

Reply
Jul 10, 2022 08:48:14   #
moldyoldy
 
WEBCO wrote:
Yes, that's the one. So Adam Schitt is proposing that the US military will NEVER have to hand over ANY documents to ANYBODY ever again. And you "think" that is a good idea?

That includes congress, any inspector general, the president, and even the Secretary of defense.

Why would ANYBODY propose such an illegal and unconstitutional ammendment?
What does that lying piece of excrement want to hide now?

This is not, simply, to hide the malfeasance of the Afghanistan withdrawal. Or the billions pouring into the Ukraine, without ANY oversight. It is to hide the actions/in actions of J****** 6th by the national guard. Plus any culpability in bioweapons development in China and the Ukraine.

Do you really think that the military should have absolutely NO oversight?
The generals in charge would become oligarchs. I spent my entire career in Spec Ops. "Some" oversight is needed. I am still a firm believer in "if you are not going on the Op, then you have NO say in how WE accomplish the Op.
Yes, that's the one. So Adam Schitt is proposing t... (show quote)



The section of law deals with prostitution near military bases.

Reply
 
 
Jul 10, 2022 14:20:18   #
WEBCO
 
moldyoldy wrote:
The section of law deals with prostitution near military bases.


So why pass an amendment that makes the military above any and all oversight?

Reply
Jul 10, 2022 15:58:38   #
moldyoldy
 
WEBCO wrote:
So why pass an amendment that makes the military above any and all oversight?


It keeps them from talking about it before the investigation. Personally I think the military doesn’t want rape allegations to become public.

Reply
Jul 14, 2022 15:04:05   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
WEBCO wrote:
Yes, that's the one. So Adam Schitt is proposing that the US military will NEVER have to hand over ANY documents to ANYBODY ever again. And you "think" that is a good idea?

That includes congress, any inspector general, the president, and even the Secretary of defense.

Why would ANYBODY propose such an illegal and unconstitutional ammendment?
What does that lying piece of excrement want to hide now?

This is not, simply, to hide thei malfeasance of the Afghanistan withdrawal. Or the billions pouring into the Ukraine, without ANY oversight. It is to hide the actions/in actions of J****** 6th by the national guard. Plus any culpability in bioweapons development in China and the Ukraine.

Do you really think that the military should have absolutely NO oversight?
The generals in charge would become oligarchs. I spent my entire career in Spec Ops. "Some" oversight is needed. I am still a firm believer in "if you are not going on the Op, then you have NO say in how WE accomplish the Op.
Yes, that's the one. So Adam Schitt is proposing t... (show quote)


AND, to hide their use of the military to spy on Trump, manufacture lies about Trump, to unmask and otherwise spy on those associated with Trump, to undermine the Trump administration, etc, etc. Oh yes, they have a lot to hide all the way back to the phony impeachments.

Reply
Jul 14, 2022 15:07:01   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
moldyoldy wrote:
It keeps them from talking about it before the investigation. Personally I think the military doesn’t want rape allegations to become public.


If they don't have to hand over or testify (give evidence) about anything they are involved in, then there can be no investigation into anything they are doing, even future plans to use the military to take over, to be ready to take over, to alter or interfere with e******ns upcoming, etc, etc.

"So Maximus, you'll just come in, take over the city and hand it back to the senate?"

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.