Supreme Court marshal calls on Maryland and Virginia Governors to enforce laws banning protesters outside Justices' homes..
proud republican wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-marshal-calls-maryland-officials-enforce-laws-banning-protests-outside-justices-homes
If there protesting peacefully, I don't see a problem.
proud republican wrote:
It's against the law..
Is it just threatening protests?
proud republican wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-marshal-calls-maryland-officials-enforce-laws-banning-protests-outside-justices-homes
The U.S. Marshal is asking the states to enforce state laws, because the DOJ refuses to enforce the same federal law?
I reckon that Garland is nursing a grudge.
proud republican wrote:
https://www.statesman.com/story/news/politics/politifact/2022/05/23/fact-check-legal-protest-outside-justices-homes-abotion-protests-roe-v-wade/9862085002/
If even one of those protestors is charged, and convicted, what are chances that their final
First Amendment appeal will be heard by the very Justices that they are picketing? Oops!
More ways than all out war to destroy a country! “IT’S THE LITTLE NIBBLES THAT SNEAK UP ON YOU! AND YOU ASK HOW DID THIS HAPPEN?
This presidency started out with “STAY HOME” “WEAR A MASK” “YOU WILL GET A SHOT” then of corse we move to!
“IT’S MY BODY” “MY CHOICE”
To letting “MEN” in women sports, to v****g a man for “WOMAN OF THE YEAR”
And now the progressive liberals that want to take our gun right’s away because of the violence, yet they promote the k*****g of baby’s! Instead of pushing BIRTH CONTROL!!!!
And you say “STOP BLAMING ACTS OF MASS VIOLENCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS”??
Tiptop789 wrote:
If there protesting peacefully, I don't see a problem.
Do you see a problem with a violation of law ?
JR-57
Loc: South Carolina
Tiptop789 wrote:
Is it just threatening protests?
No.
Title 18, Section 1507 of the U.S. Code enacted in 1950.
son of witless wrote:
Do you see a problem with a violation of law ?
Apparently if they're protesting peacefully and not trying to influence the judge, they're OK. Just exercising their 1st amendment right, you're familiar with that?
Tiptop789 wrote:
Apparently if they're protesting peacefully and not trying to influence the judge, they're OK. Just exercising their 1st amendment right, you're familiar with that?
They are breaking the law. Apparently you, like Biden and his Justice Department, do not care about the law.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-07-02/top-court-demands-end-to-protests-in-front-of-justices-homes" The chief security officer for the US Supreme Court demanded that Virginia and Maryland officials enforce laws against picketing in front of private houses, saying that “threatening activity” at justices’ homes has increased in recent weeks. "
The pure hypocrisy is laughable. The same klowns pretending there was an i**********n and not a r**t on Jan. 2021 will not enforce the law in this case.
Tiptop789 wrote:
If there protesting peacefully, I don't see a problem.
There is no such thing as demorats protesting peacefully. The whole party is a militant i**********nist group full of anti-American thugs.
Gatsby wrote:
The U.S. Marshal is asking the states to enforce state laws, because the DOJ refuses to enforce the same federal law?
I reckon that Garland is nursing a grudge.
Garland should be forced to enforce our federal laws or be forced to perform hard labor at a re-education camp in Putin's Siberia.
Big Kahuna wrote:
Garland should be forced to enforce our federal laws or be forced to perform hard labor at a re-education camp in Putin's Siberia.
Guess you've never heard of the 1st amendment
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.