One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Thoughts on the Recent Supreme Court Decisions
Page <<first <prev 5 of 12 next> last>>
Jul 3, 2022 13:06:31   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
DASHY wrote:
Swallowing a pill to stop a pregnancy is not all that barbaric. 50% of all a******ns are medically induced, many of them in the privacy of the home.


You know swallowing a pill was not what I was referencing. As long as that pill is legal, nothing I can do about it. I imagine it is taken very early on. I personally am against a******n for any reason. However; my objection is moral. That's all I can control. I never believe an innocent being should be sacrificed for someone else's choices. I recognize that being in my sixties has a way of forgetting what being young was like. If one can buy an a******n pill, then that someone could have been on the pill or at least forced the man to use some protection. They realize how babies are made. Face it, we are arguing over an occurrence that is avoidable in over 99% of all cases.

Reply
Jul 3, 2022 13:20:49   #
EmilyD
 
DASHY wrote:
The will of the people IS the issue. 60% of Americans want a******n to be a legal medical procedure. Calling a woman who has an a******n a murderer is wrong.

Just because you make up numbers, does not mean they are correct.

Here: 86% of Americans want a******n to be decided by their own v**es in their own states. Not by the government who cannot control what happens in their states.

Got it??

If you don't like the laws in your state, move to one you do like. Simple.

Calling k*****g babies what it is - murder - is t***h.

Reply
Jul 3, 2022 13:23:11   #
EmilyD
 
DASHY wrote:
What is your "dog in this fight"?

I am an American citizen. Duh.

Reply
 
 
Jul 3, 2022 13:25:00   #
EmilyD
 
DASHY wrote:
Legalizing a******n was never a federal law. The Roe decision guaranteed women's rights and ended women's deaths from botched a******ns. Legalizing a******n was never a federal law. Overturning Roe was a political decision and means a******n will be legal in blue states and restricted or banned in red states.

Legalizing a******n was federalized (made into a federal law) in 1973. What is it about that you don't get? That's what the PROBLEM is - it is not supposed to be a federal law. That's why this is such an important action by the Supreme Court. They admitted their mistake and they corrected it.

Overturning Roe was both political and judicial.....helloooooo.

Reply
Jul 3, 2022 13:27:59   #
EmilyD
 
DASHY wrote:
You are starting to sound a bit emotional!!!

Those three exclamation points are pretty emotional.

Reply
Jul 3, 2022 13:48:34   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
DASHY wrote:
The will of the people IS the issue. 60% of Americans want a******n to be a legal medical procedure. Calling a woman who has an a******n a murderer is wrong.


Just don't quote a number because you agree with a******n. Those percentages change drastically depending on how the question is asked. A majority of Americans for a******n are against late term a******ns. Progressives are so dishonest.

Reply
Jul 3, 2022 14:02:38   #
RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit
 
JFlorio wrote:
Just don't quote a number because you agree with a******n. Those percentages change drastically depending on how the question is asked. A majority of Americans for a******n are against late term a******ns. Progressives are so dishonest.


‘Progressives are so dishonest.’

That statement is such a generalization

A more accurate statement would be, anyone who disagrees with me is so dishonest.

Reply
 
 
Jul 3, 2022 14:08:21   #
EmilyD
 
RascalRiley wrote:
‘Progressives are so dishonest.’

That statement is such a generalization

A more accurate statement would be, anyone who disagrees with me is so dishonest.


Do you apply that to yourself? If not, you should.

Reply
Jul 3, 2022 14:09:25   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
RascalRiley wrote:
‘Progressives are so dishonest.’

That statement is such a generalization

A more accurate statement would be, anyone who disagrees with me is so dishonest.


Nope. I proved my point and pretty sure Dashy quoted a number she/it/confused was aware was the result of asking a question wanting to get the answer desired. Mind your own business troll.

Reply
Jul 3, 2022 14:11:25   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
EmilyD wrote:
Do you apply that to yourself? If not, you should.


Such an obvious joke these people are. I imagine they never do any self-reflecting.

Reply
Jul 3, 2022 14:17:24   #
RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit
 
EmilyD wrote:
Do you apply that to yourself? If not, you should.


I try not to generalize.

Reply
 
 
Jul 3, 2022 14:22:40   #
Sonny Magoo Loc: Where pot pie is boiled in a kettle
 
Milosia2 wrote:
I’d say it’s much worse than “taking a turn”
Toward the conservatives side.
The Court has been radicalized.
Dark money influences have stripped the court of any semblance of its former self.
How far are we from a dictatorship when
5 SC judges dictate Policy ?
And the Media drowns out All Dissent?


Yes states rights and the actual will of the people are dangerous to you bolsheviks...so I say..yea!

Reply
Jul 3, 2022 14:26:53   #
Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
 
JFlorio wrote:
Just don't quote a number because you agree with a******n. Those percentages change drastically depending on how the question is asked. A majority of Americans for a******n are against late term a******ns. Progressives are so dishonest.


Half correct. Most Americans are in the middle. Pro a******n in the first trimester. Anti a******n in the third, with exceptions. Most pretty much agree with the structure of Roe. It was just not constitutional in the way it became law through the court. States that go to far left or right on the issue may find themselves politically in trouble with their constituents. However each state's constituents are different in the way they lean which is why it should remain a state issue. One size rarely fits all.

Reply
Jul 3, 2022 14:30:44   #
EmilyD
 
RascalRiley wrote:
I try not to generalize.

Oh, I see. You only generalize if it's about republicans.....got it. I can see how that would fit your agenda.

Reply
Jul 3, 2022 14:30:50   #
DASHY
 
JFlorio wrote:
You know swallowing a pill was not what I was referencing. As long as that pill is legal, nothing I can do about it. I imagine it is taken very early on. I personally am against a******n for any reason. However; my objection is moral. That's all I can control. I never believe an innocent being should be sacrificed for someone else's choices. I recognize that being in my sixties has a way of forgetting what being young was like. If one can buy an a******n pill, then that someone could have been on the pill or at least forced the man to use some protection. They realize how babies are made. Face it, we are arguing over an occurrence that is avoidable in over 99% of all cases.
You know swallowing a pill was not what I was refe... (show quote)


You can control your own morals, but you are not allowed to force them on others. I thought your argument was to make a******n illegal because of your own personal morals.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 12 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.