Wow! fox report sure to offend the zealots: Yeah, the same zealots who claim to see jesus in their corn flakes, toast and chickenmcnuggets, not to mention clouds or their droppings in...

DJRich Loc: Western Pa

Yeah, the same zealots who claim to see jesus in their corn flakes, toast and chickenmcnuggets, not to mention clouds or their droppings in the toilet.

fox actually reports that a historian has proclaimed the shoroud of turin as an eater prop from the middle ages.

oreilly, hannity, kelly, huckleberry and the rest will avoid commenting on this.

vernon

DJRich wrote:

Yeah, the same zealots who claim to see jesus in their corn flakes, toast and chickenmcnuggets, not to mention clouds or their droppings in the toilet.

fox actually reports that an historian has proclaimed the shoroud of turin as an eater prop from the middle ages.

oreilly, hannity, kelly, huckleberry and the rest will avoid commenting on this.

why not comment he is one so called historian as compared to the dozens of people have not been able to disprove it.

VladimirPee

One problem with his story

Carbon dating proved it is from the period of Christ.

New test dates Shroud of Turin to era of Christ

The new test, by scientists at the University of Padua in northern Italy, used the same fibers from the 1988 tests but disputes the findings. The new examination dates the shroud to between 300 BC and 400 AD, which would put it in the era of Christ.

It determined that the earlier results may have been skewed by contamination from fibers used to repair the cloth when it was damaged by fire in the Middle Ages, the British newspaper reported. The cloth has been kept at the cathedral since 1578.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/03/30/shroud-turin-display/2038295/

DJRich wrote:

Yeah, the same zealots who claim to see jesus in their corn flakes, toast and chickenmcnuggets, not to mention clouds or their droppings in the toilet.

fox actually reports that an historian has proclaimed the shoroud of turin as an eater prop from the middle ages.

oreilly, hannity, kelly, huckleberry and the rest will avoid commenting on this.

DJRich Loc: Western Pa

So you are disputing the conservative oracle of t***h, the bastion of conservative thought, fox news, with a rebuttal from a l*****t, c****e rag like usatoday, and an article written back in 2013?

My, my, how the worm has turned.

DennisDee wrote:

One problem with his story br br Carbon dating pr... (show quote)

VladimirPee

Not at all. FOX reported what a historian said. And in fact he did say it. FOX didn't offer their opinion they simply reported the news.

Are you educated because you seem like an uneducated fool?

DJRich wrote:

So you are disputing the conservative oracle of t***h, the bastion of conservative thought, fox news, with a rebuttal from a l*****t, c****e rag like usatoday, and an article written back in 2013?

My, my, how the worm has turned.

PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.

DennisDee wrote:

Not at all. FOX reported what a historian said. And in fact he did say it. FOX didn't offer their opinion they simply reported the news.

Are you educated because you seem like an uneducated fool?

While I can't comment on whether he is educated or uneducated, he does, often, appear to be a fool.

vernon

DJRich wrote:

So you are disputing the conservative oracle of t***h, the bastion of conservative thought, fox news, with a rebuttal from a l*****t, c****e rag like usatoday, and an article written back in 2013?

My, my, how the worm has turned.

no the worm hasent turned ,your still the same c*******t athiest basterd you have always been./

DJRich Loc: Western Pa

In you case, the answer is obvious

DennisDee wrote:

Not at all. FOX reported what a historian said. And in fact he did say it. FOX didn't offer their opinion they simply reported the news.

Are you educated because you seem like an uneducated fool?

DJRich Loc: Western Pa

vernon wrote:

no the worm hasent turned ,your still the same c*******t athiest basterd you have always been./

VladimirPee

In you case? Is that ebonics for " In your case"

Uneducated as I expected

DJRich wrote:

In you case, the answer is obvious

DJRich Loc: Western Pa

And you are still the stupid, ignorant, uneducated slug that represnts the typical conservatard poster.

Keep up the good work slug

DJRich Loc: Western Pa

And conservatards, especially OLD ones, are experts in being a fool

Old_Gringo wrote:

While I can't comment on whether he is educated or uneducated, he does, often, appear to be a fool.

VladimirPee

I kick your ignorant ass daily.

DJRich wrote:

And you are still the stupid, ignorant, uneducated slug that represnts the typical conservatard poster.

Keep up the good work slug

VladimirPee

(conservatard ) Now that's an adult and mature word from an uneducated ghetto thug. And its more than 4 letters. I am impressed.

DJRich wrote:

And conservatards, especially OLD ones, are experts in being a fool

DJRich Loc: Western Pa

Feeble minded old fools cannot even kick their own ass, so stick to picking your beek and telling lies

DennisDee wrote:

I kick your ignorant ass daily.