ROE V WADE DECISION IS IN!!! π³π³π³ History has been made today..
Ectopic pregnancy and a******n are 2 completely different things....π
EmilyD wrote:
Who dissented?
Soto, Breyer, and the other Obama appointee
EmilyD wrote:
Who dissented?
Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan.
proud republican wrote:
Do you really think Garland will do anything to stop violence that is coming?? Rhetorical question!
Not a chance.He is a political hack pure and simple.Sure glad hes not on the supreme court.
proud republican wrote:
People need to understand that a******n is not banned.. It will go back to the states...So you can still have your a******n..A******n is not in the Constitution!
Neither is birth , should we abolish that too.
Milosia2 wrote:
Neither is birth , should we abolish that too.
What a dumb comment!!!πππ
Milosia2 wrote:
Neither is birth , should we abolish that too.
Milosia2. That comment was really really really STUPID. If you havenβt figured it out the Supreme Court does not make law. They look at laws that are written and see if they are Constitutional. Since there is no mention of a******n in the Constitution then Roe v Wade should never have been brought to the liberals in 1973.
Trying to hide a******n under privacy then it looks like anything that is not directly addressed in the Constitution could fall under this privacy. Also RvW
Was used to help revise States role and take power from them. So libs have been working on creating a one central all powerful government for over 50 years. That is Unconstitutional and not how our Constitutional REPUBLIC was formed. We the people do not answer to the government the Government answers to us. If we could get some term limits on the political ilks in government it could get straightened out. I am really sorry you donβt understand this.
Turtle keeper wrote:
Milosia2. That comment was really really really STUPID. If you havenβt figured it out the Supreme Court does not make law. They look at laws that are written and see if they are Constitutional. Since there is no mention of a******n in the Constitution then Roe v Wade should never have been brought to the liberals in 1973.
Trying to hide a******n under privacy then it looks like anything that is not directly addressed in the Constitution could fall under this privacy. Also RvW
Was used to help revise States role and take power from them. So libs have been working on creating a one central all powerful government for over 50 years. That is Unconstitutional and not how our Constitutional REPUBLIC was formed. We the people do not answer to the government the Government answers to us. If we could get some term limits on the political ilks in government it could get straightened out. I am really sorry you donβt understand this.
Milosia2. That comment was really really really ST... (
show quote)
ππππππππππ
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.