One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
ROE V WADE DECISION IS IN!!! 😳😳😳 History has been made today..
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Jun 24, 2022 15:09:42   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Ectopic pregnancy and a******n are 2 completely different things....πŸ™„

Reply
Jun 24, 2022 16:09:05   #
fullspinzoo
 
EmilyD wrote:
Who dissented?

Soto, Breyer, and the other Obama appointee

Reply
Jun 24, 2022 16:32:13   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
EmilyD wrote:
Who dissented?
Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan.

Reply
 
 
Jun 24, 2022 21:32:22   #
working dog
 
proud republican wrote:
Do you really think Garland will do anything to stop violence that is coming?? Rhetorical question!


Not a chance.He is a political hack pure and simple.Sure glad hes not on the supreme court.

Reply
Jun 24, 2022 21:33:24   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
proud republican wrote:
People need to understand that a******n is not banned.. It will go back to the states...So you can still have your a******n..A******n is not in the Constitution!


Neither is birth , should we abolish that too.

Reply
Jun 24, 2022 21:34:17   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Neither is birth , should we abolish that too.


What a dumb comment!!!πŸ™„πŸ™„πŸ™„

Reply
Jun 24, 2022 21:35:02   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
working dog wrote:
Not a chance.He is a political hack pure and simple.Sure glad hes not on the supreme court.


Me too!! πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘

Reply
 
 
Jun 24, 2022 21:52:05   #
Turtle keeper
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Neither is birth , should we abolish that too.


Milosia2. That comment was really really really STUPID. If you haven’t figured it out the Supreme Court does not make law. They look at laws that are written and see if they are Constitutional. Since there is no mention of a******n in the Constitution then Roe v Wade should never have been brought to the liberals in 1973.
Trying to hide a******n under privacy then it looks like anything that is not directly addressed in the Constitution could fall under this privacy. Also RvW
Was used to help revise States role and take power from them. So libs have been working on creating a one central all powerful government for over 50 years. That is Unconstitutional and not how our Constitutional REPUBLIC was formed. We the people do not answer to the government the Government answers to us. If we could get some term limits on the political ilks in government it could get straightened out. I am really sorry you don’t understand this.

Reply
Jun 24, 2022 22:04:09   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Turtle keeper wrote:
Milosia2. That comment was really really really STUPID. If you haven’t figured it out the Supreme Court does not make law. They look at laws that are written and see if they are Constitutional. Since there is no mention of a******n in the Constitution then Roe v Wade should never have been brought to the liberals in 1973.
Trying to hide a******n under privacy then it looks like anything that is not directly addressed in the Constitution could fall under this privacy. Also RvW
Was used to help revise States role and take power from them. So libs have been working on creating a one central all powerful government for over 50 years. That is Unconstitutional and not how our Constitutional REPUBLIC was formed. We the people do not answer to the government the Government answers to us. If we could get some term limits on the political ilks in government it could get straightened out. I am really sorry you don’t understand this.
Milosia2. That comment was really really really ST... (show quote)


πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.