Ranger7374 Loc: Arizona, 40 miles from the border in the DMZ

If you run for political office, such as the president, then you are surrounded by advisors, correct?

So if an advisor incorrectly advised the president, who is responsible if the president runs with the advise of his advisor?

Then there is another step here, isn't campaigning for any position and act of persuasion? And by "applying pressure" on any ally or enemy is now illegal? Then how else can one persuade?

The 2020 e******n may have been "improper" but how will anyone know the t***h of whether it was proper or not? There is no contradictory statements to prove the accusations, therefore where's the sound evidence? All I hear is hearsay.

Examples are, he said that she said that etc.....Trump pressured government agencies to "hold on to power".

....and the Church said, "The world is flat"

Experience has shown that t***h always lies between two evils. One lie that tells half t***hs, and the other lie that is outrageous. And the only path to the t***h is through "fire". This "fire" comes from contradictory statements and questions, that can determine the path that was taken. Once the evils are burned away all that's left is t***h- St. Jerome and. St. Augustine.

Trump is a New Yorker, and they are raised to fight to the bitter end. That's what Adams did, Jefferson did, and Hamilton (who was a New Yorker) all did. Review the e******n of 1800.

So, the question remains... What crime did Trump commit? He still lost the e******n. So what crime did the president commit?

Now, Trump was campaigning, therefore he's persuading people. Is the act of persuasion a crime?

Now to ill-advise a man like Trump is a crime. Therefore, in a remote sense, Easton as well as Clark may have given false information to Trump. But again, until we question these findings, we will never know.

One could then only conclude that if Trump is guilty of the crime of persuasion, then so is Hillary Clinton. And Hillary's crime against the United States is worse than Trump's.

Her crime would be s******n too. By obstructing a sitting president on a bogus charge of "Russian Collusion" that would get him impeached. Which led to character assassination.

To be fair to both sides we should drop the blame game and see what went wrong and correct it, not charge a former president. It does not good to do this. But they want to do it anyways. So here we go...

Besides what I wrote above and regardless of what happens, I do however believe that Easton and that attorney general were well off base and can be sited with criminal charges. I would say at the most agree with that. Ill-advising the president is dishonorable and can lead to needless violence.

But that's all I can gather from one side of the story....how about you?

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

Why is it ?
Every time youz get your tit caught in the ringer out comes Hillary?
Along with a whole list of whattabouts.
Are youz totally and completely unable to
accept anything at all as being real ???
This severe denial of reality is not healthy.
This is how meth monkeys think.

** To be fair to both sides we should drop the blame game and see what went wrong and correct it, not charge a former president. It does not good to do this.**

This is about as twisted as it can get.
Let’s all just forget about it.
Being fair to both sides isn’t necessary.
When only one side is guilty . Hillary wasn’t charged with anything so why do you keep bringing up Hillary . Hillary testified for 11 hours and they found nothing.
The very next day they started up another investigation. Boogiemen, the right is nothing without boogiemen.

Ranger7374 Loc: Arizona, 40 miles from the border in the DMZ

Same can be said about you with Trump. Solves nothing

Peaver Bogart Loc: Montana

Why is it ?
Every time youz get your tit caught in the ringer out comes Ronald Reagan?

Ranger7374 Loc: Arizona, 40 miles from the border in the DMZ

If one side can't forget about Trump, and the other side can't forget about Hillary, then we have an impasse.

liberalhunter Loc: Your mom's house

Hahaha..... delusional at best, your projection and narcissistic self are beyond obvious and ignorant to a degree not seen since the last time Pelosi opened her suck in front of a camera.
Get better meth....... Tweaker.