So, in essence, you agree with my previous post's opening paragraph, in that it is a matter of individual perspective and partisan/ideological differences, e.g., if Biden walked across the Atlantic for a NATO Conference, you would proclaim "Joe can't swim"

Regarding Trump's "style" and international standing: He is The Ugly American.

Greatest Description of Donald Trump Ever (You edged into somewhat in the right direction)

“Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?” Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England wrote the following response:

A few things spring to mind. Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem. For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace – all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed. So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.

Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing – not once, ever. I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility – for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman. But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what a joke is – his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.

Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he only crows or jeers. And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults – he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.

There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It’s all surface. Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront. Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul. And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist. Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that. He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat. He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.

And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully. That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly t***sforms into a snivelling sidekick instead. There are unspoken rules to this stuff – the Queensberry rules of basic decency – and he breaks them all. He punches downwards – which a gentleman should, would, could never do – and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless – and he kicks them when they are down.

So the fact that a significant minority – perhaps a third – of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think ‘Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:

• Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.

• You don’t need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man.

This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss. After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of sh*t. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum. God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid. He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart. In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely from human flaws – he would make a Trump.

And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clump-fuls of hair and scream in anguish: ‘My God… what… have… I… created?’ If being a twit was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set.

What I am reading here is that you don't judge Trump by his actions as president but rather, you judge him for his personality and manner(s)(isms). <ost of us who support Trump don't see him as our kind of guy, but we think he did god things for the country where as Biden is tearing us apart at the seems.

That being said, in 2019 I traveled through both London airports, crisscrossed London on their trains, spent time in the Isle of Mann and spoke to everyone I could. ALL, every single one, said they wished they had a President Trump running their country. I think your boy, Nate, must work for CNN or something akin.

Sorry. It appeared to be the ongoing style of addressing based on the prior posts. Just like the style of saying courts are r****t because they send more B****s than W****s (by percentage) into prison, ignoring that young Black men commit the majority (by percentage) of violent crime. Or calling a woman a man, ignoring her sexual plumbing. Or calling a limitation on specific immigrants, for the purpose of protecting Americans, a Muslim ban. Your article was a little informative, but clearly biased and pushing an opinion. Try finding one that objectively looks at the facts. Would YOU accept an article by Rush Limbaugh as evidence for MY position?