One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Is it time for Trump supporters to admit they were s**mmed
Page <<first <prev 13 of 16 next> last>>
Jun 27, 2022 14:49:24   #
fullspinzoo
 
soontobeindicted mattoid wrote:
Haven't succumbed to being s**mmed yet.

Don't intend to.

Sad to see how much chump fleeced his supporters.

Fleeced how? Are you competent enough to cite some examples?

Reply
Jun 27, 2022 15:05:00   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
Fleeced how? Are you competent enough to cite some examples?

Even if you were competent enough to understand his grift, you wouldn't admit to it....

https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-249445-1.html (excerpt below)

"Even before he lost, Trump was in full fundraising mode. He had been since the summer. Biden was well ahead on fundraising, and that can be critical in the latter part of the e******n. As much as some of us are political wonks and know everything that’s going on in the nearly two year P**********l political seasons, plenty of regular people don’t tune into this with any real consideration until the debates, until maybe September, maybe October. That’s a hell of a time to run out of money. So Trump pumped hard over the summer. Too hard. He was money-bombing his supporters for weekly matching donations they didn’t know about over the summer. That resulted in at least $121 million in credit card charge-backs by August/September, but that money was pretty much spent. So he had to keep raising money.

The loss gave him the perfect opportunity to fight the e******n. He immediately started busking for his “Recount Committee” or wh**ever. Right off, only 40% of that money went to the recount effort. The remaining 60% was going to pay off the campaign debt. Thing is, this was spectacularly successful! He brought in over $200 million in November of 2020. And the one thing you know about any huckster is their firm belief that it’s immoral to allow a fool to keep his money."

Reply
Jun 27, 2022 17:22:13   #
whole2th
 
slatten49 wrote:
Even if you were competent enough to understand his grift, you wouldn't admit to it....

https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-249445-1.html (excerpt below)

"Even before he lost, Trump was in full fundraising mode. He had been since the summer. Biden was well ahead on fundraising, and that can be critical in the latter part of the e******n. As much as some of us are political wonks and know everything that’s going on in the nearly two year P**********l political seasons, plenty of regular people don’t tune into this with any real consideration until the debates, until maybe September, maybe October. That’s a hell of a time to run out of money. So Trump pumped hard over the summer. Too hard. He was money-bombing his supporters for weekly matching donations they didn’t know about over the summer. That resulted in at least $121 million in credit card charge-backs by August/September, but that money was pretty much spent. So he had to keep raising money.

The loss gave him the perfect opportunity to fight the e******n. He immediately started busking for his “Recount Committee” or wh**ever. Right off, only 40% of that money went to the recount effort. The remaining 60% was going to pay off the campaign debt. Thing is, this was spectacularly successful! He brought in over $200 million in November of 2020. And the one thing you know about any huckster is their firm belief that it’s immoral to allow a fool to keep his money."
img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (show quote)


Public broadcast by the media (who have given the DEMS and RINOs of J6 C*******e free air time) should be balanced with 2000 Mules and Absolute Proof documentaries. This would help settle the questions about whether the counted v**es were legal--or even switched from Trump to Biden electronically.

slatten, kemmer and other change agents' position won't stand the light of day.

Reply
 
 
Jun 27, 2022 17:30:29   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
whole2th wrote:
Public broadcast by the media (who have given the DEMS and RINOs of J6 C*******e free air time) should be balanced with 2000 Mules and Absolute Proof documentaries. This would help settle the questions about whether the counted v**es were legal--or even switched from Trump to Biden electronically.

slatten, kemmer and other change agents' position won't stand the light of day.


👍 👍 👍 👍 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏

T***h well spoken!

Reply
Jun 27, 2022 17:36:09   #
fullspinzoo
 
whole2th wrote:
Public broadcast by the media (who have given the DEMS and RINOs of J6 C*******e free air time) should be balanced with 2000 Mules and Absolute Proof documentaries. This would help settle the questions about whether the counted v**es were legal--or even switched from Trump to Biden electronically.

slatten, kemmer and other change agents' position won't stand the light of day.

Agree 100%

Reply
Jun 27, 2022 18:45:11   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
whole2th wrote:
Public broadcast by the media (who have given the DEMS and RINOs of J6 C*******e free air time) should be balanced with 2000 Mules and Absolute Proof documentaries. This would help settle the questions about whether the counted v**es were legal--or even switched from Trump to Biden electronically.

slatten, kemmer and other change agents' position won't stand the light of day.


Your documents and movie are in the public market place and the public is free to accept or reject them. No one is forcing Americans to watch either the hearings or read about them . They are making choices.

Mr. Trump has his own social network to make his case, and he has Newsmax, Fox, AON, Red State, and myriad other outlets to broadcast his case.

Your accusations about illegal v**es or switched v**es have been in the public sphere for a year and a half.
Time to stop whining and come to grips with the fact that most Americans reject those allegations and are getting an accurate picture of the Trump presidency in all it's 'glory'.

Reply
Jun 27, 2022 18:50:22   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
slatten49 wrote:
Dinesh D'Souza has been, from his beginnings, a real film-maker's version of Alex Jones.



Reply
 
 
Jun 27, 2022 21:50:52   #
BIRDMAN
 
soontobeindicted mattoid wrote:
Keep on sending chump your money.

He needs it.


I am I have a grocery store I’ll give me $.50 cash on my Link card I send it to Trump

Reply
Jun 27, 2022 22:15:18   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
I agree as to how laughable the movie is, Blade.

How credible is the information in the movie 2000 Mules by Dinesh D’Souza? In sworn testimony, former Attorney General Bill Barr answered that same question by bursting out laughing.

The fundamental mistake it makes is in assuming that because someone was near a b****t box, they must have been stuffing it. As opposed to, say, going shopping at the nearby supermarket.

Barr also said it would have been different if there was photographic evidence of the same person repeatedly stuffing the b****t box, but there is no such evidence.

Moreover — and this is me talking rather than Barr — in most states it’s completely legal to drop off b****ts for someone else. It’s easy to imagine someone who works at a senior home or a hospital or a school collecting all the b****ts from his or her co-workers, and dropping them all off at once.

So even if D’Souza had the photographic evidence Barr was asking for, it still wouldn’t prove a thing.

Finally, don’t forget that D’Souza is a convicted felon.

His felony? Fraud...whereas, Jone's conviction was for defamation.

Reply
Jun 27, 2022 22:43:01   #
whole2th
 
slatten49 wrote:
I agree as to how laughable the movie is, Blade.

How credible is the information in the movie 2000 Mules by Dinesh D’Souza? In sworn testimony, former Attorney General Bill Barr answered that same question by bursting out laughing.

The fundamental mistake it makes is in assuming that because someone was near a b****t box, they must have been stuffing it. As opposed to, say, going shopping at the nearby supermarket.

Barr also said it would have been different if there was photographic evidence of the same person repeatedly stuffing the b****t box, but there is no such evidence.

Moreover — and this is me talking rather than Barr — in most states it’s completely legal to drop off b****ts for someone else. It’s easy to imagine someone who works at a senior home or a hospital or a school collecting all the b****ts from his or her co-workers, and dropping them all off at once.

So even if D’Souza had the photographic evidence Barr was asking for, it still wouldn’t prove a thing.

Finally, don’t forget that D’Souza is a convicted felon.

His felony? Fraud...whereas, Jone's conviction was for defamation.
img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (show quote)


You misrepresent the evidence presented in 2000 MULES. It is easy to discern your motives in lying about 2000 MULES.

Reply
Jun 27, 2022 23:01:32   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
slatten49 wrote:
I agree as to how laughable the movie is, Blade.

How credible is the information in the movie 2000 Mules by Dinesh D’Souza? In sworn testimony, former Attorney General Bill Barr answered that same question by bursting out laughing.

The fundamental mistake it makes is in assuming that because someone was near a b****t box, they must have been stuffing it. As opposed to, say, going shopping at the nearby supermarket.

Barr also said it would have been different if there was photographic evidence of the same person repeatedly stuffing the b****t box, but there is no such evidence.

Moreover — and this is me talking rather than Barr — in most states it’s completely legal to drop off b****ts for someone else. It’s easy to imagine someone who works at a senior home or a hospital or a school collecting all the b****ts from his or her co-workers, and dropping them all off at once.

So even if D’Souza had the photographic evidence Barr was asking for, it still wouldn’t prove a thing.

Finally, don’t forget that D’Souza is a convicted felon.

His felony? Fraud...whereas, Jone's conviction was for defamation.
img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (show quote)


"The fundamental mistake it makes is in assuming that because someone was near a b****t box, they must have been stuffing it. As opposed to, say, going shopping at the nearby supermarket."

Not many people go shopping at 1 o'clock in the morning. You also might want to explain why some those mules were wearing gloves when they dropped f**e b****ts into the boxes. And, in one case, the woman removed her gloves after dropping the f**e b****ts in the box. Can you explain why she did that?

Reply
 
 
Jun 27, 2022 23:35:32   #
fullspinzoo
 
slatten49 wrote:
I agree as to how laughable the movie is, Blade.

How credible is the information in the movie 2000 Mules by Dinesh D’Souza? In sworn testimony, former Attorney General Bill Barr answered that same question by bursting out laughing.

The fundamental mistake it makes is in assuming that because someone was near a b****t box, they must have been stuffing it. As opposed to, say, going shopping at the nearby supermarket.

Barr also said it would have been different if there was photographic evidence of the same person repeatedly stuffing the b****t box, but there is no such evidence.

Moreover — and this is me talking rather than Barr — in most states it’s completely legal to drop off b****ts for someone else. It’s easy to imagine someone who works at a senior home or a hospital or a school collecting all the b****ts from his or her co-workers, and dropping them all off at once.

So even if D’Souza had the photographic evidence Barr was asking for, it still wouldn’t prove a thing.

Finally, don’t forget that D’Souza is a convicted felon.

His felony? Fraud...whereas, Jone's conviction was for defamation.
img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (show quote)


The felony was a big nothingburger.

Reply
Jun 27, 2022 23:45:55   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
The felony was a big nothingburger.


IOW, a meatless burger! 😂

Reply
Jun 29, 2022 04:58:37   #
whole2th
 
Maniacal laughing exemplified by the criminal liar, Hillary (and others of her lying ilk) exemplifies the sum total of ‘rebuttal’ of exposure of the s****n e******n and farcical J6 inquisition.

https://youtu.be/HIh6dgshLUU

When ‘THEY’ are laughing, they are caught in their lies.

THEY LIVE and their existence is grounded in lies.

Reply
Jun 29, 2022 05:11:21   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
slatten49 wrote:
I agree as to how laughable the movie is, Blade.
Interesting how you turned that around when you were the nub of the joke.



Reply
Page <<first <prev 13 of 16 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.