Anyone Who Is Not Interested In What The 6th Hearings Have Found Would Be Truly Worthless As Jurors
This would be those who have made up their minds, those whom place political beliefs before logic and facts in front of your faces.
I just saw results of a politically charged trial the other day that had one juror that refused to convict despite all the others being sufficiently convinced that the person was guilty. Jurors made the written comment to the judge that this person was politically biased due to comments he had made.
The law, the rule of law is dead when people bring political beliefs to the table who are willing to allow crimes to happen when they are politically oriented.
We know there are people that have made up their minds that the 6th committee is a witch hunt, that they are somehow making things up.
woodguru wrote:
This would be those who have made up their minds, those whom place political beliefs before logic and facts in front of your faces.
I just saw results of a politically charged trial the other day that had one juror that refused to convict despite all the others being sufficiently convinced that the person was guilty. Jurors made the written comment to the judge that this person was politically biased due to comments he had made.
The law, the rule of law is dead when people bring political beliefs to the table who are willing to allow crimes to happen when they are politically oriented.
We know there are people that have made up their minds that the 6th committee is a witch hunt, that they are somehow making things up.
This would be those who have made up their minds, ... (
show quote)
I would add that the 'rule of law' is also dead when an illegitimate committeeis composed of hand picked, biased members.
American Vet wrote:
I would add that the 'rule of law' is also dead when an illegitimate committeeis composed of hand picked, biased members.
Even wussguru knows the committee’s a sham. His t*****rous butt just doesn’t care.
JFlorio wrote:
Even wussguru knows the committee’s a sham. His t*****rous butt just doesn’t care.
Speaking of t*****rous butts.
Have you turn d your tv on ????
Milosia2 wrote:
Speaking of t*****rous butts.
Have you turn d your tv on ????
Yep. Watching the Stanley Cup playoffs.
Milosia2 wrote:
Speaking of t*****rous butts.
Have you turn d your tv on ????
Lizard Chaney admitted tonight that they knew days in advance that there would be trouble (orchestrated by nasty nancy, who ALSO turned down Trumps request for national guard) ... so why didn't she get off her sorry @$$ and call for more c*****l p****e or the national guard?!?!?
Looks like a witch hunt to me as there is no one to talk about the other (T***HFUL) side...
Saw that on Fox. She just proved Trumps version of the timeline. She’s the Milosia2 of RINO’s.
1ProudAmerican wrote:
Lizard Chaney admitted tonight that they knew days in advance that there would be trouble (orchestrated by nasty nancy, who ALSO turned down Trumps request for national guard) ... so why didn't she get off her sorry @$$ and call for more c*****l p****e or the national guard?!?!?
Looks like a witch hunt to me as there is no one to talk about the other (T***HFUL) side...
Strycker
Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
woodguru wrote:
This would be those who have made up their minds, those whom place political beliefs before logic and facts in front of your faces.
I just saw results of a politically charged trial the other day that had one juror that refused to convict despite all the others being sufficiently convinced that the person was guilty. Jurors made the written comment to the judge that this person was politically biased due to comments he had made.
The law, the rule of law is dead when people bring political beliefs to the table who are willing to allow crimes to happen when they are politically oriented.
We know there are people that have made up their minds that the 6th committee is a witch hunt, that they are somehow making things up.
This would be those who have made up their minds, ... (
show quote)
A jury that is only allowed to hear the prosecution's case with no defense case being allowed would be a worthless jury anyway. Had the committee actually investigated all of J** 6th I would be interested, however, a predetermined one sided investigation of only one aspect of the events is neither interesting or meaningful. This is nothing more than the third impeachment of Donald Trump.
woodguru wrote:
This would be those who have made up their minds, those whom place political beliefs before logic and facts in front of your faces.
I just saw results of a politically charged trial the other day that had one juror that refused to convict despite all the others being sufficiently convinced that the person was guilty. Jurors made the written comment to the judge that this person was politically biased due to comments he had made.
The law, the rule of law is dead when people bring political beliefs to the table who are willing to allow crimes to happen when they are politically oriented.
We know there are people that have made up their minds that the 6th committee is a witch hunt, that they are somehow making things up.
This would be those who have made up their minds, ... (
show quote)
Just like the 2nd Faux Impeachment-though choreographed by an ABC producer to look like a documentary, it was representing lies by omission and editing out the facts. A one-sided flounder with little new information.
It's honestly sad to see how low the Democrats and their AG will stoop to try to embarrass and smear Republicans or defy our laws with the unnecessary public arrest of Peter Navarro and the 17 month belated arrest of the GOP Michigan gubernatorial candidate for a misdemeanor incident for J** 6 protest. Political vengeance. Coincidentally this had to happen right before the unconstitutional J** 6 c*******e took to the airwaves in primetime. F*****t regimes jail their political opposition and opt to censor the dissent of their people (i.e.: DHS "disinformation board"). This is what our country has become under an uncaring regime that must push forth their climate-driven agenda at the high costs of the American citizens. the Democrats are power-hungry control freaks.
JFlorio wrote:
Saw that on Fox. She just proved Trumps version of the timeline. She’s the Milosia2 of RINO’s.
Kash Patel was on Hannity explaining in detail, and with evidence of a letter, that Trump requested "up to 20,000 troops" to be in DC on J****** 6 and Nancy Pelosi denying it. Here's the interview. It leaves no doubt that this occurred:
https://www.fightwithkash.com/articles/kash-patel-on-hannity-explaining-he-has-documented-proof-that-trump-ordered-10-000-national-guardAny one with a functioning brain and common sense know J****** 6 , 2021 was a set up by Speaker Of The House Nancy Pelosi to stop any and all debate by the US Congress on the MASSIVE FRAUD that took place in the 2020 e******n. No court of law has heard all the evidence and used the legal term of Standing as a reason for not allowing evidence of massive e******n F***D in 2020 e******n to get to a court of law.
It was a set up with paid instigators, like Ray Epps! What ever happened to him? There are several videos of him shouting at protestors to invade the capital that night and the next day. What happened to that i**********nist? If anyone should be charged with treason, it is that man, and yet he is nowhere to be seen and free as a bird!
Ray Epps video (scroll down a bit):
https://meaww.com/ray-epps-ex-marine-j***6-capitol-v***l-video
Milosia2 wrote:
Speaking of t*****rous butts.
Have you turn d your tv on ????
Yep! watching Tucker Carlson as they (the dem selest lie comitte) put on their facade !!!!!!
EmilyD wrote:
Kash Patel was on Hannity explaining in detail, and with evidence of a letter, that Trump requested "up to 20,000 troops" to be in DC on J****** 6 and Nancy Pelosi denying it. Here's the interview. It leaves no doubt that this occurred:
https://www.fightwithkash.com/articles/kash-patel-on-hannity-explaining-he-has-documented-proof-that-trump-ordered-10-000-national-guardAny one with a functioning brain and common sense know J****** 6 , 2021 was a set up by Speaker Of The House Nancy Pelosi to stop any and all debate by the US Congress on the MASSIVE FRAUD that took place in the 2020 e******n. No court of law has heard all the evidence and used the legal term of Standing as a reason for not allowing evidence of massive e******n F***D in 2020 e******n to get to a court of law.
It was a set up with paid instigators, like Ray Epps! What ever happened to him? There are several videos of him shouting at protestors to invade the capital that night and the next day. What happened to that i**********nist? If anyone should be charged with treason, it is that man, and yet he is nowhere to be seen and free as a bird!
Ray Epps video (scroll down a bit):
https://meaww.com/ray-epps-ex-marine-j***6-capitol-v***l-videoKash Patel was on Hannity explaining in detail, an... (
show quote)
Stupid i***t Cheney actually let the cat out of the bag. She admitted they new days ahead a time, from the FBI that there was a threat against the capital. So if they knew, the question that should have been answered last night was why they weren't prepared? Also, who was responsible?
Interesting, just became aware I'm truly worthless.
Wasn't the O.J. jury enough to convince you the jury system is tragically flawed??
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.