RandyBrian wrote:
A very revealing post. Thank you. It tells us a lot about you. Interesting to note that a 'slightly slanted' view makes FOX, in your mind, a 'propaganda channel of Republicans' and Tucker Carlson a 'w***e s*********t'. And yet YOU also believe that CNN, the NYTs, and the rest of the MSM are fair, balanced, objective, and accurate with their 24/7 endless repeating of DNC talking points and other lies.
Please provide one....just ONE.....shred of evidence that Mr. Carlson is a w***e s*********t. Actual examples, please, not your interpretation of what he was really saying.
A very revealing post. Thank you. It tells us a ... (
show quote)
His touting of replacement theory for one example. Politifact, a non allied fact cheaking organation, has a whole article on Tucker's repeated touting of that theory, and the Buffalo shooter saying he was inspired bt Tucker. Just search for Tucker Carlson replacement theory. There are lots of articles, because Tucker said a lot of w***e s*********t stuff over a long time.
pegw wrote:
His touting of replacement theory for one example. Politifact, a non allied fact cheaking organation, has a whole article on Tucker's repeated touting of that theory, and the Buffalo shooter saying he was inspired bt Tucker. Just search for Tucker Carlson replacement theory. There are lots of articles, because Tucker said a lot of w***e s*********t stuff over a long time.
Pretty difficult for the Buffalo shooter to tout Carlson when he wrote he h**ed Fox News.
Please have your caretakers put you back on your meds.
pegw wrote:
His touting of replacement theory for one example. Politifact, a non allied fact cheaking organation, has a whole article on Tucker's repeated touting of that theory, and the Buffalo shooter saying he was inspired bt Tucker. Just search for Tucker Carlson replacement theory. There are lots of articles, because Tucker said a lot of w***e s*********t stuff over a long time.
Tucker Carlson never talked about Replacement Theory..🙄
proud republican wrote:
Tucker Carlson never talked about Replacement Theory..🙄
I thought you said you were a nice person. How dare you correct her idiocy.
PS: where is AuntiE? She hasn’t posted any funnies in a while.
Lily wrote:
I thought you said you were a nice person. How dare you correct her idiocy.
PS: where is AuntiE? She hasn’t posted any funnies in a while.
I don't know, Lily... I'm wondering the same thing....
pegw wrote:
Fox news, the propaganda channel of Republicans. Proof 1/2 of Americans hve IQ's below 100. I have seen the nightly news by Fox, its slightly slanted to the car wreck of the day and has a Republican slant. The talking heads are disaster, espically the w***e s*********t, Tucker Carlson.
Defend what you just said.
pegw wrote:
His touting of replacement theory for one example. Politifact, a non allied fact cheaking organation, has a whole article on Tucker's repeated touting of that theory, and the Buffalo shooter saying he was inspired bt Tucker. Just search for Tucker Carlson replacement theory. There are lots of articles, because Tucker said a lot of w***e s*********t stuff over a long time.
If there are ‘lots of articles’ you should have no difficulty providing a link. Only leftoids want someone else to do their work.
proud republican wrote:
I don't know, Lily... I'm wondering the same thing....
I’ll think about sending her a PM.
Lily wrote:
I’ll think about sending her a PM.
I miss hi our funnies too..
pegw wrote:
His touting of replacement theory for one example. Politifact, a non allied fact cheaking organation, has a whole article on Tucker's repeated touting of that theory, and the Buffalo shooter saying he was inspired bt Tucker. Just search for Tucker Carlson replacement theory. There are lots of articles, because Tucker said a lot of w***e s*********t stuff over a long time.
Unfortunately, and falsely, the MSM and most l*****ts consider pointing out simple, provable, and obvious facts to be 'w***e s*******y' stuff. So it is hard to take such a statement seriously.
As to the 'replacement theory'......well, I do not know about that, since I do not know about the specifics of the theory. What I DO know is that the Democrats have been pushing for effectively open borders for decades. They have fought tooth and nail against ANY efforts to stop or control the flow of i******s into the United States. They are offering incentives and invitations to the i*****l i*******ts, and making them as welcome as they can to move into our country. And they are trying to ease the new comers into being able to v**e legally. In President Biden, they have a happily willing tool to that process. Are the looking to 'replace' White people with POC? Probably not.
What they ARE trying to do, is bring into America as many poor and uneducated POC as possible to v**e for the Democrat Robin Hood policies in order to keep the Democrat party in permanent power. Do you deny that? Careful.....think before you answer! It is both a t***h test AND an IQ test.
pegw wrote:
His touting of replacement theory for one example. Politifact, a non allied fact cheaking organation, has a whole article on Tucker's repeated touting of that theory, and the Buffalo shooter saying he was inspired bt Tucker. Just search for Tucker Carlson replacement theory. There are lots of articles, because Tucker said a lot of w***e s*********t stuff over a long time.
That is merely your opinion.
And Politifact is not non-allied. They are associated with Poynter Institute...In 2018, PolitiFact was acquired by the Poynter Institute, a nonprofit school for journalists. Also, Politifact was founded in 2007 by the Tampa Bay Times and utilizes reporters and editors from the Times and affiliated media outlets.
EmilyD wrote:
That is merely your opinion.
And Politifact is not non-allied. They are associated with Poynter Institute...In 2018, PolitiFact was acquired by the Poynter Institute, a nonprofit school for journalists. Also, Politifact was founded in 2007 by the Tampa Bay Times and utilizes reporters and editors from the Times and affiliated media outlets.
Goodness. Is ANYTHING Peg posts proving to be accurate? I'm starting to think that all Peg does is regurgitate DNC talking points, with zero vetting. I need to remember that. It's hard to have an actual discussion or debate if the evidence presented is suspect.
Tiptop789 wrote:
You believe Fox News? Aren't they part of the MSM?
There is Right and right, and Left and wrong
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.