PeterS wrote:
that has you conservatives so t***sfixed that no amount of national carnage could ever convince you to give up your semi-automatic guns? I mean we have children who are k**led, adults who are k**led, and teenagers k**led yet the only impact it makes on cons is that it's the Democrats who are at fault because they are stopping us [cons] from having more guns because it's only if we have more guns everything would be A-okay!
What's been lost on you cons is that we've been buying more guns, and buying more guns, to the point we are the most heavily armed "civilized" country in the world yet the violence hasn't subsided. Look at Texas, there is no question that all the conservatives have guns plus most of those in the middle and I'm making a safe assumption that 99% of them are packing yet, with the exception of stopping one church shooting, they have been totally ineffective in stopping the growing numbers of mass shootings in this once great state? Since Texas is such a heavily conservative state and they are so heavily armed why hasn't it caused mass shootings to go down instead of up? Shouldn't Texas be a great test for conservative theories on more guns are better and even better are more guns than those!
Now, as a liberal Democrat, I naturally think that we should disarm, not continue to arm ourselves. When we look at other countries it's clear that disarming works but I have come to realize the fact that cons have been successful in flooding this nation with so many semi-autos that it would be impossible to try to disarm ourselves now. So now, I'm at a loss for a solution. As Texas has shown, more guns simply meant more violence, so should we simply surrender ourselves to the violence that is to come? Is that the only choice we have? It seems like it is because conservatives have been so successful in getting their way...
that has you conservatives so t***sfixed that no a... (
show quote)
Nothing like exaggerating your fears with a couple tons of hyperbole, right, Peter?
Seriously, do you actually believe that semi-auto firearms are causing a "national carnage"?
You make it sound like everybody and their brother who owns a semi-auto firearm is out there gunning down everything that moves.
Crime, drug abuse, broken families, r****t violence, psychosis, you name it, are all symptoms of a diseased society.
You wanna heal a sick society, you must focus on the cause, not the effects.
Do you have any idea how many people have been k**led in mass shootings.
Since 1982, the number is 1363. This accounts for all public mass shootings, including schools, in which 5 or more people were k**led. It does not account for the high percentage of mass k*****gs resulting from family squabbles or those in which people were only wounded and none k**led.
Fact is the number of times firearms of all kinds have been used in self defense far exceeds the number of times one has been used in commission of a crime. GDU research studies have confirmed this.
Based on research by University and Independent criminologists (CPRC for example),
and the research methods used, the number of times per year in which an armed citizen stopped an attack or prevented a crime is between 500,000 and 2.5 million. Even CDC found no reason to question these studies.
Gun related deaths in US are around 40,000 per year and climbing.
54% are suicides, 43% are homicides, and 3% are accidental.
43% of 40,000 is 17,200 murders.
At 52 homicides per 100,000 people, El Salvador has the highest murder rate in the world,
followed closely by Honduras and Venezuela.
At 5.3 homicides per 100,000 people, the United States murder rate is lower than 75 other countries.
.