Yes, the Bath School bombing in Bath, Michigan on May 18, 1927 - 44 dead, 38 of whom were children.

The most deadly mass k*****g in US history was the Tulsa Race Massacre on May 31 and June 1, 1921 - 101 years ago - took the lives of 300 and injured 800. The violence began when white mobs attacked the black residents and business of the Greenwood District in Tulsa. The attack was carried out using guns, fire and private aircraft and aided by the United States National Guard. The attack, carried out on the ground and from private aircraft, destroyed more than 35 square blocks of the district – at that time the wealthiest black community in the United States, known as "Black Wall Street". Thousands were left homeless.

Did some research this morning for another thread. According to statistical analysis by Princeton University and others, the odds of you being k**led in a mass shooting is 0.00000143%. That is close to the same odds of being struck by lightning.

There is something entirely pathological in the way l*****ts inflate, over-exaggerate, or otherwise hyperbolize the lethality of a particular semi-automatic rifle. You'd think this particular gun is a WMD just one notch below a 5 kiloton tactical nuke. Can't get any more irrational than that.

Would you support a ban on all semi-automatic weapons? What isn't being addressed is the harm done to the psyche of the nation every time someone takes a semi-automatic weapon and lets loose on a group of people.

What has to happen, eventually, is that any and all semi-automatic weapons currently in someone's possession are grandfathered in but can only be used legally on gun ranges. But there can be no further manufacture, import, or sale of a semi-automatic weapon, and the bullets and clips necessary for their function are treated the same. And of course, there will be a full buyback program. Eventually, the semi-automatic will become so expensive to buy on the black market that only the most determined criminals are going to buy them. As for the mentally ill, it will be harder and harder for them to come up with the cash necessary to buy an AR15 making mass shootings because of mental illness a much more rare event...

I am a gun enthusiast, I have competed in more types of competitive disciplines than I can list right off hand. Most took expensive high quality custom firearms to give yourself a competitive edge... .45's that are custom tuned for trigger pull and feed reliability, speed event revolvers that have incredible trigger pulls, AR15 style rifles that will shoot nice groups at 600yds.

...I support background checks
...I support wait periods for background checks to be completed
...I support mental health reporting
...I support unhinged people with anger management issues and restraining orders to be f**gged
...I support 21 year old age restrictions
...and I support magazine size restrictions

And so do millions of other responsible gun enthusiasts

...right wing gun nuts support nothong, everything is a slippery slope

I again challenge you, your handgun, your rifle at your range with your range officer . again my handgun and rifle at my range with their range officer...... im calling you out once again to use your sk**ls to embarrass me.... your guns at home court.

Loser never posts on this forum again, or 100 bucks a point at 100 rounds and a 6 month vacation with read only.

Surely a badass like you with all them sk**ls can wreck some ignorant hard right redneck ........ show the forum you're not a lying sack of s**t and make a good example of me.

Fight or flight...... show us your true colors.

I am a gun enthusiast. I am also a veteran and unlike you, I have been in a shooting fight. I competed against active duty law enforcement and have won one competition and placed in the top five in three others.
I do support background checks that we have now. The problems start after the check is done and the 100,000 plus stops last year alone resulted in less than one hundred prosecutions. The goobermint claims a lack of funding. That's odd; they just gave 40 billion dollars of our money to Ukraine.
We have instant background checks right now that work just fine almost all the time. At least as well as the "waiting period" you espouse.
We already have mental health reporting. Once more nothing is perfect.
Red f**g laws such as Florida's are fine. They must be preferred by law enforcement, medical personnel or an officer of the court, upon receipt of evidence, and the complaint must be sworn to on penalty of perjury by the complainant. You don't have these petty and malicious actions like in MD, where anyone can swear to a red f**g complaint with no proof and no penalties for lying. This resulted in the death of at least one innocent man.
If the subject is found innocent his property is returned IMMEDIATELY, he doesn't have to wait months to get it back. How would you like it if someone swore out a red f**g on you because you pissed them off and all your expensive toys were confiscated and you had to wait months to get them back after having been found innocent?
As for magazine restrictions, why? I thought you were some sort of expert. Pore lil' ol' me, who only qualified expert with both rifle and pistol in the Army, and who has actually been in a shooting fight, can change out a magazine in less than five seconds, usually in about three or four. You mean to tell me an expert like you with all your expensive toys can't do this? It is a sk**l that takes an hour to learn. (Maybe two hours or three for a ten-thumbed Liberal.)
Maybe you can explain to this old knuckle-walker what difference a larger magazine makes when most mass shootings are ambushes in which no one can shoot back because they happen in gun free zones? I know, pass more laws that say no guns allowed; that should solve the problem. When no one can return fire, and anyone with normal dexterity can change out magazines in a couple of heartbeats, what the hell difference does the magazine size make? I personally prefer the twenty over the thirty, simply because back when I was in the Army the twenty's were less likely to have spring problems.
One more thing; all your expensive toys to give yourself a "competitive edge" and all the tacticool crap so popular today means nothing in a real fight. You are probably going to be taken by surprise, or at least without much notice. Most incidents occur at less than twenty yards.Your target is shooting back and if you aren't moving you are an i***t. I have trained to shoot while moving and it's totally different. Now try it when you're being shot at. You want something that will actually benefit you in real life, practice shooting on the move and getting at least three rounds into a torso sized target at distances of ten to twenty yards as fast as you can. You don't need to drive tacks, you need to put rounds in the torso as fast as you can at realistic ranges.

I suppose the mass shooters will just have to go back to k*****g people with bolt action rifles and handguns. Did you ever stop to think that these mass shootings invariably happen in gun free zones where no one can shoot back? Did you ever stop to think that in a case like that it doesn't matter what kind of gun you have? Wait, what am I saying? I just asked you if you ever stopped to think. Obviously I didn't or I would have realized that Liberals don't think; they just regurgitate some talking point that sounds intelligent whether it is or not. We are talking Liberal intelligence here; an oxymoron if I ever heard one, and it is much easier to step over the bar of Liberal intelligence than it is to crawl under it.

Yes, you can k**l people with bolt action rifles or revolvers but the numbers won't be the same and it's the ease of use of an AR15 that is causing the large numbers of dead and injured...you run through a clip, you pop in another clip...whereas with bolt action gun and revolvers all take time and practice to reload and start shooting again. People who just bought the guns and walked into classrooms won't have that kind of familiarity with their guns. That will give potential victims time to charge the shooter and take him down. You don't have that advantage with a gun that a novice can reload in just a few seconds. What I am talking about is giving people as much advantage vs a shooter as possible while staying within the confines of the second amendment.

Now for your intelligence comment. People who use the likes of Hannity or Carlson as their brains don't have room to criticize others about their intelligence. If conservatives can ever evolve past your knuckle d**gger stage (and that will never happen so long as you let demagogues think for you) I will be happy to debate "intelligence" with you. But I still have visions of your MAGA MOB d**gging their knuckles all over the Capitol building all because they bought into the lies of a narcissist president who used Fox and other RW outlets to broadcast those lies to every conservative in the republican party over and over and over until they became the absolute t***h.

Now go ahead and accuse liberals of the same and I'll just point to MSNBC's and CNN's sagging poll numbers as proof that we don't hang on every word they say. So be careful with your accusations because right now they are just projection and you are painting yourself into the box that you are trying to paint liberals into.