Mikeyavelli

Portly Democrat Hillary Lawyer really didn't know that he was representing Hillary Clinton when he concocted evidence paid for to look legit so that the FBI had some evidence to go after Trump.
But Sussman has friends on the jury who pretended that the FBI didn't know Sussman at all and had no idea that Sussman represented Hillary and they saved the plot to attack Trump from being further discovered and prosecuted.
Their Democracy advanced with this fixed decision. America lost another battle with the left.

Liberty Tree

True, if this took place with a Republican the lefties would be going berserk. But they are not known as the party who wants the "rule of law" applied evenly.

Mikeyavelli

We should find out where Sussman lives and where these jurors live and, you know, protest outside their homes, you know, like the kommiecrats do. According to the kommiecrats, it's all legal and perfectly fine. Don't give those t*****rs a moment's rest. Time to fight back, just like the kommiecrats do.

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

No big surprise at the verdict since the swamp creatures protect their own. And the Democrats will ignore the evidence and continue to dispute it because of this verdict. Get ready for their denials of any wrongdoing. Meanwhile, the J** 6 commission plods along with its false narrative and the Democrats eat it up.

Sussmann verdict in, but Hillary's role in e******n f***d revealed
John Durham now preparing for trial of source of Clinton-funded 'dossier'
Art Moore By Art Moore
Published May 31, 2022 at 2:56pm
Hillary Clinton (DNC video screenshot)
Hillary Clinton (DNC video screenshot)

A Washington, D.C, jury on Tuesday acquitted former Hillary Clinton lawyer Michael Sussmann of lying to the FBI, but the most important outcome of the case for special counsel John Durham was the confirmation of Hillary Clinton's role in a plot to weaponize the FBI to launch an investigation of her Republican opponent in the 2016 e******n.

The jury saw compelling evidence that Sussmann falsely presented himself as a concerned citizen rather than as a member of Clinton's campaign when he gave the FBI data to support the bogus claim that Donald Trump had a secret communications channel with the Kremlin through computer servers owned by a Russian bank.

The jury foreman told a reporter after the verdict that she didn't think the case should have been prosecuted.

"There are bigger things that affect the nation than a possible lie to the FBI," she said.

TRENDING: Classmates mob 18-year-old 'heretic' who challenged pro-t***s ideology

But during the trial, former Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook testified that Hillary Clinton "agreed with the decision" to feed the evidence-free Trump-Russia claim to the FBI.

In Durham's indictment of Sussmann, he said the evidence against the Clinton lawyer reveals "a scandal much deeper than merely Sussmann's role in a second Russian h**x — a scandal that entangles the Clinton campaign, multiple internet companies, two federally-funded university researchers, and a complicit media."

The prosecution said during the trial that the material Sussmann gave to the FBI was "pure opposition research" for the purpose of concocting an "October Surprise" in the 2016 e******n.

The case also revealed that the FBI's top brass were excited about Sussmann's claim. An agent told a colleague in a text, "People on 7th floor to include Director are fired up about this server," referring to James Comey and the bureau's top brass.

Will Hillary Clinton ever face criminal charges for her role in the Trump-Russia collusion h**x?
Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to WND news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
And further, the Sussmann prosecution confirmed the Clinton campaign paid the opposition research firm Fusion GPS to produce the infamous dossier of unverified and now debunked claims against Trump compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele.

The dossier, fueling the Trump-Russia probe, was used as evidence to obtain warrants to spy on the Trump campaign.

Next for Durham is the trial in October of Russian-national Igor Danchenko, the primary source for the Steele dossier. The indictment presents evidence that the Clinton campaign hired people to feed the contents of the dossier – which turned out to be Russian disinformation – to law enforcement, intelligence agencies and the media to influence the e******n.

cali

😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

Kinda, sorta, like Trump's impeachment! 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣

Mikeyavelli

It's never going to change until we the people change it. No one in Washington DC has the interest or the courage to do anything about the usurpation of the American government by the international left.
T*****rs all, to a man in Washington DC.

Big Kahuna

The "role" of law is now meant to go after innocent parties but not the guilty parties. Where are the kneebenders when they should be fighting for "social justice"? If anyone is in a courtroom and the judge walks in, just take a knee as a means of showing our indictment of our current judicial system. It is rotten to the core.

Big Kahuna

Dox sussman, all jurors and the Clintons for another s**m they pulled on us.

Mikeyavelli

It was fixed from the start. Durham didn't really bring a good case for public understanding and he went after a nobody in the attempt by everyone in the FBI to remove Trump from office and or prevent him from getting elected.
Victory for the t*****rs in Washington DC.