The GOP home of Rapist Protection? Since it looks like the Supreme Court is going to Rule that Roe VS wade is unconstitutional. With at least 3 states not allowing for rape or incest...

jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

Since it looks like the Supreme Court is going to Rule that Roe VS wade is unconstitutional.
With at least 3 states not allowing for rape or incest does this not make the GOP party a Rapist protectionist party?

Marty 2020 Loc: Banana Republic of Kalifornia

jimpack123 wrote:

Since it looks like the Supreme Court is going to Rule that Roe VS wade is unconstitutional.
With at least 3 states not allowing for rape or incest does this not make the GOP party a Rapist protectionist party?

Not at all!
If you want to murder your baby, go to California, they support all kinds of evil wicked sinful things!

Big Bass

jimpack123 wrote:

Since it looks like the Supreme Court is going to Rule that Roe VS wade is unconstitutional.
With at least 3 states not allowing for rape or incest does this not make the GOP party a Rapist protectionist party?

NOPE!!!

Rose42

jimpack123 wrote:

Since it looks like the Supreme Court is going to Rule that Roe VS wade is unconstitutional.
With at least 3 states not allowing for rape or incest does this not make the GOP party a Rapist protectionist party?

If you ever looked at the stats you’d see that rape is a very tiny percentage as the reason for an a******n.

Your statement is akin to saying democrats protect p*******es

susanblange Loc: USA

In The Kingdom of God, aka The New World Order, rape and a******n will disappear. Rape is a deadly sin and those who commit it will not be forgiven. There will also no more be pre-marital sex, adultery, or incest. The only women getting pregnant will be those impregnated by their husbands. There will be nor more any unwanted pregnancies and a******n will disappear. The coming Messiah is pro-choice but she h**es a******n.

microphor Loc: Home is TN

jimpack123 wrote:

Since it looks like the Supreme Court is going to Rule that Roe VS wade is unconstitutional.
With at least 3 states not allowing for rape or incest does this not make the GOP party a Rapist protectionist party?

If you only had a 🧠 !!!

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Rose42 wrote:

If you ever looked at the stats you’d see that rape is a very tiny percentage as the reason for an a******n.

Your statement is akin to saying democrats protect p*******es

Which, by definition many blue states do. The subjects they want to teach our kids would classify some teachers as a p*******e. If they approached a child in the park and brought up the subject they could be charged.

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

jimpack123 wrote:

Since it looks like the Supreme Court is going to Rule that Roe VS wade is unconstitutional.
With at least 3 states not allowing for rape or incest does this not make the GOP party a Rapist protectionist party?

***The GOP home of Rapist Protection?
>>>Do you know how stupid that sounds?

Big Bass

LogicallyRight wrote:

***The GOP home of Rapist Protection?
>>>Do you know how stupid that sounds?

Not surprising, he is one of the kings of stupid.

Marty 2020 Loc: Banana Republic of Kalifornia

Big Bass wrote:

Not surprising, he is one of the kings of stupid.

Fudge packing Jim has no sense.

Big Bass

Marty 2020 wrote:

Fudge packing Jim has no sense.

He (?) wears that on his sleeve.

America 1 Loc: South Miami

Rose42 wrote:

If you ever looked at the stats you’d see that rape is a very tiny percentage as the reason for an a******n.

Your statement is akin to saying democrats protect p*******es

It seems Democrats do protect p*******es, Biden for one.

Big Kahuna

jimpack123 wrote:

Since it looks like the Supreme Court is going to Rule that Roe VS wade is unconstitutional.
With at least 3 states not allowing for rape or incest does this not make the GOP party a Rapist protectionist party?

No, but it makes the DemoKraut party the "Official Party of Murder."

jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

LogicallyRight wrote:

***The GOP home of Rapist Protection?
>>>Do you know how stupid that sounds?

sure got every ones attention was just asking a question as that will be on the v**ers minds come Nov. best not live in those states and hope that your kids or Grandchildren never get raped as it does happen.

Truth be known

Let's put Roe v. Wade back to what it was in the 1970's. I know that both sides of the fence will be upset. Row v. Wade allowed a******n, no questions asked in the first trimester. After that, a******ns were ONLY ALLOWED FOR HEALTH REASONS, depending ON the mother or the fetis, not allowed at ALL "for up to birth" a******ns. Also, if a mother wanted an a******n, she HAD TO PAY FOR IT HERSELF, NOT FUNDED BY PUBLIC FUNDS! I've noticed that people want to make the mother responsible for the new life of a child, BUT NO ONE IS HOLDING THE SPRIM DONOR RESPONSIBLE!!!!!! NOT AT THE TIME OF CONCEPTION, NOT DURING GESTATION, NOT AT THE TIME OF BIRTH AND NOT DURING THE ADOLESCENT TIMES OF THIS CHILD!!!!! Usually, this spirm DONOR has made several promises to achieve his goal.. MAYBE, US WOMEN NEED MEN TO SIGN CONTRACTS SO WE CAN SUE YOU FOR " BREACH OF CONTRACT" since most attorneys are male, and these are terms that you understand.