Death-by-Lockdown.
May 15, 2022 19:31:49 #
Then President Trump echoed these same predictions in 2020, all were "debunked" by the bunksters.
On March 28 – very early in the p******c – AIER published an article that I felt at the time received far too little attention. “Drugs, Suicide, and Crime: Empirical Estimates of the Human Toll of the Shutdown” by economists Audrey and Thomas Duncan cited empirical literature on the human toll of economic devastation.
This article forecasted more than 100,000 excess deaths due to drug overdoses, suicide, alcoholism, homicide, and untreated depression – all a result not of the v***s but of policies of mandatory human separation, economic downturn, business and school closures, closed medical services, and general depression that comes with a loss of freedom and choice.
These two economists demonstrated that as bad as a v***s is, policies that wreck normal social functioning will cause massive and completely unnecessary suffering and death. Because the article was so well-cited, with references to all the available literature, I thought it would make a difference. But after it appeared, it was crickets. I was amazed. Here you have a beautiful piece of research that perfectly forecasted the nightmare being created by politicians and their advisers and it made no dent in the national narrative.
Here we are seven months later and the worst has come true. These two economists should be considered prophets. Sure enough, the Centers for Disease Control has documented a shocking number of excess deaths not from C***d.
Scott Atlas summarizes:
Hispanic: 40% excess deaths NOT C***d related
Black: 46% NOT C***d related
White: 38% NOT C***d related
25-44: 77% excess deaths NOT C***d related
65+: 39% NOT C***d related
https://www.aier.org/article/death-by-lockdown/
On March 28 – very early in the p******c – AIER published an article that I felt at the time received far too little attention. “Drugs, Suicide, and Crime: Empirical Estimates of the Human Toll of the Shutdown” by economists Audrey and Thomas Duncan cited empirical literature on the human toll of economic devastation.
This article forecasted more than 100,000 excess deaths due to drug overdoses, suicide, alcoholism, homicide, and untreated depression – all a result not of the v***s but of policies of mandatory human separation, economic downturn, business and school closures, closed medical services, and general depression that comes with a loss of freedom and choice.
These two economists demonstrated that as bad as a v***s is, policies that wreck normal social functioning will cause massive and completely unnecessary suffering and death. Because the article was so well-cited, with references to all the available literature, I thought it would make a difference. But after it appeared, it was crickets. I was amazed. Here you have a beautiful piece of research that perfectly forecasted the nightmare being created by politicians and their advisers and it made no dent in the national narrative.
Here we are seven months later and the worst has come true. These two economists should be considered prophets. Sure enough, the Centers for Disease Control has documented a shocking number of excess deaths not from C***d.
Scott Atlas summarizes:
Hispanic: 40% excess deaths NOT C***d related
Black: 46% NOT C***d related
White: 38% NOT C***d related
25-44: 77% excess deaths NOT C***d related
65+: 39% NOT C***d related
https://www.aier.org/article/death-by-lockdown/
May 15, 2022 20:23:23 #
Gatsby wrote:
Scott Atlas summarizes:
Hispanic: 40% excess deaths NOT C***d related
Black: 46% NOT C***d related
White: 38% NOT C***d related
25-44: 77% excess deaths NOT C***d related
65+: 39% NOT C***d related
Scott Atlas summarizes:
Hispanic: 40% excess deaths NOT C***d related
Black: 46% NOT C***d related
White: 38% NOT C***d related
25-44: 77% excess deaths NOT C***d related
65+: 39% NOT C***d related
Scott Atlas, are you frigging kidding? That was perhaps one of the stupider and less qualified of the i***ts that trump relied on.
May 15, 2022 20:27:09 #
woodguru wrote:
Scott Atlas, are you frigging kidding? That was perhaps one of the stupider and less qualified of the i***ts that trump relied on.
Aren't you actually talking about yourself when you say "one of the stupider and less qualified of the i***ts?"
May 15, 2022 21:44:16 #
woodguru wrote:
Scott Atlas, are you frigging kidding? That was perhaps one of the stupider and less qualified of the i***ts that trump relied on.
History has proven that Trump and Atlas were 100% correct, and you have proven yourself 100% the fool.
May 16, 2022 08:05:39 #
woodguru wrote:
Scott Atlas, are you frigging kidding? That was perhaps one of the stupider and less qualified of the i***ts that trump relied on.
Typical weak-minded ELWNJ response: Cannot refute the content so attacks the source.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.