Is the Supreme Court Seriously Above the Law? (Page 2): Did you make that up or simply took someone else's rhetoric as gospel? No such clause exists in the constitution, perhaps you...

woodguru

currahee506 wrote:

Babies are human beings beginning at conception. Unless they are pronounced dead in the womb by a doctor because of accidental circumstances, the baby must not be aborted by the "baby k**lers." Our American Constitution, defined in its original intent, embraces this as "absolute."

Did you make that up or simply took someone else's rhetoric as gospel? No such clause exists in the constitution, perhaps you are thinking bible?

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

Bevvy wrote:

No one , nobody , not one person , no individual ( with one exception ) is trying to take any right from anyone ... the only exception is the far left

No, it’s actually 5 Republican appointed justices that are taking away your rights.
Without even a whimper from the Republican women , if there are any left.

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

woodguru wrote:

Did you make that up or simply took someone else's rhetoric as gospel? No such clause exists in the constitution, perhaps you are thinking bible?

That’s Sharia Law !
The American Taliban dictating religious policies for the government to adhere to.

rjoeholl

Milosia2 wrote:

Womens Rights Advocates go Way Back .
It was never about a******n.
It was about Womens Rights.
And this still stands today where Men are trying to take away womens rights.
5 Men actually .
5 rogue judges introducing Sharia Law onto this country .
Welcome to the Taliban Supreme Court !
All by themselves .
Is this how a Democracy is run ?
Or have we crossed some bridge we didn’t know about ???

Why don't you move to a democracy and let us know how you like it?

Big Kahuna

Liberty Tree wrote:

Democrats think the Congress they control is above the Constitution.

The DemoKrauts want to legalize murder. They have been doing it for years but now want a Constitutional amendment to make it the Law of the Land.

Big Kahuna

Milosia2 wrote:

No, it’s actually 5 Republican appointed justices that are taking away your rights.
Without even a whimper from the Republican women , if there are any left.

I know a lot of Republican women. They stand head and shoulders above you and your alt l*****t sisters.

Big Kahuna

Milosia2 wrote:

That’s Sharia Law !
The American Taliban dictating religious policies for the government to adhere to.

C****e George soreass and the c****e demokraut party is doing a bang up job of dictating their evil policies to us. It looks like they could use a little religious training.

Rose42

Milosia2 wrote:

Womens Rights Advocates go Way Back .
It was never about a******n.
It was about Womens Rights.
And this still stands today where Men are trying to take away womens rights.
5 Men actually .
5 rogue judges introducing Sharia Law onto this country .
Welcome to the Taliban Supreme Court !
All by themselves .
Is this how a Democracy is run ?
Or have we crossed some bridge we didn’t know about ???

Thats a long attempt by Hartmann to try and justify depravity. Its not about women’s rights but the rights of the unborn child

The ‘right’ to k**l the unborn for convenience is not in the Constitution. To try and craft a narrative that its also inferring a message of w***e s*******y is wholly self serving for the left. Interestingly enough it was the so called ‘progressives’ who first championed eugenics.

Hartmann is just another hyper partisan and really no different than Carlson. He is Carlson minus the brashness.

Carol Kelly

No, the Supreme Court is the Constitutional decisive law and should not be intimidated in any way…Federal Law?

elledee

I think the more relevant question is. Is you IQ even double digits ?

jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho

Carol Kelly wrote:

No, the Supreme Court is the Constitutional decisive law and should not be intimidated in any way…Federal Law?

The justices would not even look at a single piece of 2020 evidence because they knew if the outcome ruled for Trump, the extremists would burn America down and once momentum got going the less than extremists would join in. Kinda like the howling at the moon, cocoa and puppies with universities suspending classes when T***p w*n

microphor Loc: Home is TN

jack sequim wa wrote:

The justices would not even look at a single piece of 2020 evidence because they knew if the outcome ruled for Trump, the extremists would burn America down and once momentum got going the less than extremists would join in. Kinda like the howling at the moon, cocoa and puppies with universities suspending classes when T***p w*n

Yelp

jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho

Bevvy wrote:

The r****t , evil history of the a******nists can spin up a story

Your headline,
Yes they are above the law. One needs look no further than using and twisting the 14th amendment for same sex marriage. To make matters worse the court made it law unconstitutional because congress makes the law of the land.
Oh , the 14th amendment was written for s***es at that time in history but somehow the court used it to define marriage.

microphor Loc: Home is TN

Milosia2 wrote:

Womens Rights Advocates go Way Back .
It was never about a******n.
It was about Womens Rights.
And this still stands today where Men are trying to take away womens rights.
5 Men actually .
5 rogue judges introducing Sharia Law onto this country .
Welcome to the Taliban Supreme Court !
All by themselves .
Is this how a Democracy is run ?
Or have we crossed some bridge we didn’t know about ???

For the babies it's about murder