permafrost wrote:
The war, if real , was started by the first murder by a radical right winger at a clinic which did a******ns. or at the Doctors home.. Murder is murder and the radicals embrace it with glee.
First off, I renounce murder of any kind by anyone.
Now then let me ask you the same question I asked Woodguru…
And let’s see if you can answer honestly.
What if this a******n issue were, instead, a battle for the life of newborn babies up to nine months old.
And what if those of us who are Christians claimed we are not allowed to commit murder of anyone INCLUDING those 0-9 month-olds.
Because, contrary to science, biology, and biblical morality, the secular society decided by decree-
“We don’t answer to your God. We make the rules because there is no God, we believe we were evolved from inanimate objects to higher life forms. Therefore, we make the rules to govern ourselves. So go pound rocks, we’ve decided that if a mother doesn’t want to take responsibility for the child she birthed that is her right.”
Here’s my question:
Now then, how would you expect us Christians to act toward such senseless, immoral legalized murdering of newborn babies based on the convenience of the mother whether she wants to be responsible for that child or not?
Is it possible for you to answer honestly?
Because if you can you will see and understand why Christians cannot and will not under any circumstances relent in their defense of living unborn human beings.
Because, to begin with in this light, the first ones murdered were the unborn living human beings in a******n clinics. So by first denigrating living human beings, based on ideology not science, can you even begin to make the claim that anti a******nists started this “war”.
And furthermore, if you answer honestly, you will understand that our God-given liberty to freedom of religion and freedom of speech is being endless challenged and denied legitimacy by our antagonists based on their self-determined worldview.
But I sincerely doubt you have the honesty and integrity to answer this question t***hfully.
And that will prove, yet again, that your argument is based on defending your ideology at all cost rather than openly and honestly.
Go ahead, prove me wrong.
Because it will put you in a pickle. If you prove me wrong g you will have to prove your own attacks against the pro life to be in error, and then you’d have to change your position in opposition to those who are against the taking of the life of living unborn human beings.
Just because you are in denial that a******n is murder, doesn’t change the fact that innocent, living, unborn human being’s lives are snuffed out and they are denied basic rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Your self-willed opinion that you are in anyway on high moral ground is nothing but self-delusion.