woodguru wrote:
No chance these things are actually facts huh?
Are you aware of the toxic levels of r****m cases in his manufacturing plants he is losing court cases on? I will guarantee you that the burden of proof in cases like that has to be overwhelmingly strong. There is a r****t at the top of that pile...because otherwise he would have put a stop to it a long time ago.
I’ll ask you the same thing.
Quote:
“ NYT itself reports @elonmusk:
1. Had non-white friends growing up in apartheid SA
2. His own father was an ANTI-APARTHEID politician
3. He literally left so he didn't have to serve in apartheid military
They still insinuate he is a r****t”
Unquote.
No chance these things are actual facts, huh?
By your personal ”guarantee”, without evidence, that Musk is a r****t, the only thing you have “proven” by such a stunt is that you have zero regard for the doctrine of “innocent until proven guilty”. That fact alone is telling. It means character assassination (an ad hominem) is a tactic you are all to ready and willing to employ if it will further your agenda/ideology. So, you’ve just exposed yourself.
Consequently, that is also evidence that you justify yourself for condemning a man on false pretenses merely for the unforgivable sin, in your mind, of not aligning with your ideology and/or what is deemed politically correct according to what you are told to parrot. In this case, Musk’s true “crime” (in the left’s estimation) is allowing alternative points of view from yours to be openly expressed and considered. And, since that can’t be tolerated, therefore, shaming him and defaming his character have become legitimate tactics for you since, for l*****ts like you, the ends justify the means.
However, for those of us with working moral compasses, it is apparent that if you have to use such underhanded, dishonest tactics to defend your actions and legitimize your ideology, it is obvious that the end product of your ideology is just as underhanded and dishonest as your method of defending and achieving it, otherwise you could defend it openly and honestly without having to resort to these dishonest and underhanded tactics.
Therefore, you’ve unwittingly proven my statement that folks like you don’t deserve to be granted a seat at a table of rational, and I’ll add ethical, discussion.