PeterS

This is a topic started by a conservative where 23 million supposedly were tested and 2,226 developed heart problems of one type or another. (The actual study was no where that I could find)

Topic Statement: Dore examined an April 21 article in the U.K.’s Express, “V*****e Study of 23 Million Shows Risk of ‘Heart Problems’ from M*****a or P****r Jab.”
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/study-myocarditis-c***d-v*****es-jimmy-dore/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=2acd94db-baf4-40f9-8fc3-ec304b98b1ae
Video https://youtu.be/-S9Dz6PZ1gU

First conservative reply: they don't care. and you will be persecuted .The democrats had c***d developed in Ukraine ,and manufactured in China to remove our 45th president .Now ,they have started a War ,And at home ,civil war over a******n .These politicians have no soul ,are not human ,and don't care how many die .

Second Conservative reply to first respondent: True, and it’s going to get worse before the brainwashed wake up and realize who the true enemy is.

Third Conservative reply to first respondent:

Forth Conservative reply to first respondent: BINGO! They have NEVER CARED! Why? They are EVIL!

Now here’s the t***h, the chance of having heart problems works out to 0.009678% (2,226/23,000,000) and, according to the CDC, unv******ted adults are 97% more likely to die from C***d than boosted adults.
So your chance of having heart problems is close to nil but if you get sick you are 97 times more likely to die than those who are boosted.

Now my point is, this is the process that you conservatives go through to ascertain the "T***h" and it is as big a pile of Bull S**t as you could ever hope to see.

99.99% of what conservative 1 said was either hearsay or something he made up himself and each and every conservative that followed agreed with him 100% even though none of them read the article or used any type of critical thinking to determine if what he said was true.

That’s how you conservatives ascertain the t***h--from hearsay and reinforcement of hearsay, even if what is said is absolute bull S...! And sadly, I've seen nothing from you that would lead me to believe that you 'think' differently than another conservative on this board. You think you are an individual person Blade but the whole point of conservativism is conformity--everyone thinks and behaves the same--else you are a RINO and ostracized from the party!

That's "T***h" Blade in the realm of the conservative the same realm that you immerse yourself in 24/7 and a realm where you don't dare venture into liberal territory.

Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois

Please provide a link to the topic you are referring to Pete.

Thanks in advance.

Smedley_buzkill

Not bad, until you consider that so your "source" neglects the fact that the CDC does not consider one "fully v******ted" until two weeks after the second dose. How convenient, since most of the incidents occur within this time period.

Smedley_buzkill

Give him a minute; he'll have to get someone to do it for him.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Remember how cardiovascular deaths and cancer deaths decreased dramatically during the p******c? And how there wasn't an increase in deaths overall compared to previous years during the p******c??

Liberty Tree

How much of what the CDC says can we believe?

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Peter, you say "(The actual study was no where that I could find)". Let me explain to you how you go about finding the study. First you click the hyperlink https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticl/2791253#:~:text=Findings%20In%20a%20cohort%20study,years%20after%20the%20second%20dose.

Then you read the article. Here is what you would have found: