How come? The number one topic starter on this forum rarely, if ever, offers responses in defense of the multitude of topics posted? Just curious.

archie bunker Loc: Texas

The number one topic starter on this forum rarely, if ever, offers responses in defense of the multitude of topics posted?
Just curious.

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

archie bunker wrote:

The number one topic starter on this forum rarely, if ever, offers responses in defense of the multitude of topics posted?
Just curious.

Bet he brags about it too😂😂😂

Peaver Bogart Loc: Montana

archie bunker wrote:

The number one topic starter on this forum rarely, if ever, offers responses in defense of the multitude of topics posted?
Just curious.

Who is the #1 starter? It used to be Proud Republican, but I think she's around 5 or 6 now.

keepuphope Loc: Idaho

archie bunker wrote:

The number one topic starter on this forum rarely, if ever, offers responses in defense of the multitude of topics posted?
Just curious.

And who is that?

Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon

archie bunker wrote:

The number one topic starter on this forum rarely, if ever, offers responses in defense of the multitude of topics posted?
Just curious.

You mean Woodguru. I notice the same thing. Maybe he just wants to see what people say--just a guess

Smedley_buzkill

Coos Bay Tom wrote:

You mean Woodguru. I notice the same thing. Maybe he just wants to see what people say--just a guess

You know what smells worse when you stir it up? Look up copraphiliac.

Smedley_buzkill

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:

Bet he brags about it too😂😂😂

There is a maxim about a certain something that smells worse when you stir it up. It is within the realm of possibility that copraphilia is not unknown on OPP.

Army

Starters never answers questions just start them

woodguru

Coos Bay Tom wrote:

You mean Woodguru. I notice the same thing. Maybe he just wants to see what people say--just a guess

I engage with intelligent responses, at the point where people get stupid I have no need to try to engage with nonsense. I do try to engage with people that can refrain from insults and nonsense that has nothing to do with a topic.

debeda

archie bunker wrote:

The number one topic starter on this forum rarely, if ever, offers responses in defense of the multitude of topics posted?
Just curious.

Who's number 1??? I've not been paying attention

debeda

woodguru wrote:

I engage with intelligent responses, at the point where people get stupid I have no need to try to engage with nonsense. I do try to engage with people that can refrain from insults and nonsense that has nothing to do with a topic.

Oh, you're #1. Congrats?

America 1 Loc: South Miami

archie bunker wrote:

The number one topic starter on this forum rarely, if ever, offers responses in defense of the multitude of topics posted?
Just curious.

Woodgirly spreads more gossip than a group of old ladies at their afternoon tea.

Big Kahuna

America 1 wrote:

Woodgirly spreads more gossip than a group of old ladies at their afternoon tea.

Wood"pecker" talks big but carries a little stick.

American Vet

woodguru wrote:

I engage with intelligent responses, at the point where people get stupid I have no need to try to engage with nonsense. I do try to engage with people that can refrain from insults and nonsense that has nothing to do with a topic.

Have you posted anything about r****m? Shall we engage in an intelligent conversation about that?

too many uppity cubans and b****s – Woody Apr 19, 2022 19:28:37

keepuphope Loc: Idaho

woodguru wrote:

I engage with intelligent responses, at the point where people get stupid I have no need to try to engage with nonsense. I do try to engage with people that can refrain from insults and nonsense that has nothing to do with a topic.

Actually if you have wisdom on a subject you don't just drop it when confronted with questions or what you say gets dropped by any serious thinkers for a sound bite. Back up your theories if you comprehend what your point is.